GOP Is Struggling To Give 'Malaria' Tickets Away
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
A lot are,...a lot aren't. Unfortunately most likely more are than not.
Oh, dude. No.This too long. Let me just tell you this and I'd like @Damocles and @T. A. Gardner and @Lionfish and even @Uncensored2008It really wasn't for you. I know you have the attention span of a three-year-old.
I know. I really wasn't expecting you be able to follow along. Frankly, I expect that you couldn't read and understand half of what I wrote.
Nope. It was an observation, not a characterization. Words matter, and you should learn them.
All totally irrelevant. Try again. Discuss his behavior that got himself killed. Obviously if you are going to AVOID discussing everything about how he got himself killed, you won't be able to consider all the things he did to get himself killed.
Everything you have to say that omits Pretti's deliberate actions is dismissed. So far, you have said nothing on the matter.
If this were a debate, you would have just lost.
Nope.
1. I have no idea who the "Proud Boys" are. Are they central to your argument? If so, you just lost.
2. Obama did send masked goons to round up many more illegal aliens that Trump has, and We the People supported him in that regard. Now, when Trump is doing the exact same thing but to a lesser extent, shits such as yourself are violently assaulting ICE instead of allowing them to do their jobs. Leftists are shits.
FTFY. Yeah, I know. It's not like you could ever hold your own in any sort of discussion at the adults' table.
Too funny. I bet you wouldn't be able to define it. That's why you stopped short. Way too funny!
I see you are tipping your king. This is your first wise move of the game.
You can feel free to stop. Don't tax your neuron. My post was for the edification of others who might be wondering if your gibberish was worth getting your spittle on their shirts.
Yes, I know. You are a liar. You are a totally dishonest shit, regurgitating exactly what the DNC orders you to believe.
I don't think that would be true.
I'll refresh your memory. You claimed that I only post what I post in order to avoid proper nouns. Your argument is false because I don't avoid proper nouns.
Are there any proper nouns in particular you believe I am avoiding?
You haven't supported any yet, and this assertion of yours is just your latest unsupported assertion.
I wouldn't expect you to know this, but observations, science, math and empirical evidence don't require sourcing. It was stupid of you to demand it.
The video provides the observations. No sourcing is needed. Your arguments are falsified. Your conclusions are dismissed.
I'm fine with you trying to make a case, but be clear. State your points individually. I realize that you are only capable of vomiting incoherence, but you could ask someone nearby for help.
State your case and I'll tell you why you are mistaken.
They certainly are. You suck at economics. Ask me how I know.
I'll put it to you this way and hopefully you'll understand; if not, you can ask someone for help.
Suppose you have something to sell, say a book, that you are selling for $7. Now let's say that I am interested in buying that book. Assume that we are not bound by any regulations and that we have a completely free market. Then you decide "Wait a minute! IBDaMann is a piece of shit. I'm going to charge him a $3 tariff just for being the shit that he is."
We still have completely free trade, and if I want to buy that book from you for $7, I'll have to pay your additional $3 tariff.
Please tell me you get it.
Great, teach me something.
The Constitution does not pretend that the three branches are somehow equivalent. They share power.
If this were a debate then you would have lost right here.
False. The Supreme Court does not have the power to give anyone immunity to anything.
Nope. Apparently you haven't been paying attention.
If this were a debate, you would have lost for the third time right here.
Were you going to support you assertion, or are you under the impression that your declaration is sufficient, owing to your omniscience and your omnipotence?
I can FEEEEEL your love fore your fellow man.
Spent. Yes, please feel free to rest your neuron and to do something else today rather than dedicate precious time and resources trying to understand things that you read.
Listen up:
You know what happened last Saturday looks bad. The NRA is starting to turn against trump for his comments about "he should not have had a gun". Now, trump's not even talking about it. At his cabinet meeting yesterday. Reporters were shouting questions at trump about Pretti. Uncharacteristically, trump wouldn't answer. So you know now TRUMP knows how bad this looks. trump's minions in the WH are starting to backstab each other. They know the midterms are coming up. Dems are already pretty much in for majority in the house. With this latest bullshit by trump's goons - now the Senate might even be in play.
So look - what does this mean? Impeachments? Probably. I think articles have already been drawn up for Noem. Noem is a moron, but I actually feel sorry for her. It's Bovino who should be brought before congress - Bovino is the demon responsible for the rough treatment of Minnesotans. His objective was to terrorize - do maximum damage. What trump is trying to do is to beat any opposition into submission. The message is: "Do what we want and even vote how we want, or this will happen".
Now - I've gone on very long - I bash people for doing that. I have some theories about what might happen if the Dems take charge of everything come 2029 - which I know is a longshot. I was shocked 2024 happened! Part 2 if you all want.
Handsome devil!FTFY.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Three guesses which one was more sexually satisfying for her.
This Slovenian piece of shit defied established American social tradition twice; once when she refused to allow incoming first lady Jill Biden a visit to the White House during the 2020 transition, and then snubbing Jill Biden's invitation for tea at the White House during the 2024 transition.
She did c rated photos…. Not sure it’s porn exactly
Both, for her bank account, neither sexually. A woman like doesn’t fuck for physical pleasure.Three guesses which one was more sexually satisfying for her.
Melania Trump's Film Struggles To Sell Tickets, As Insiders Expose Alleged Plot To Shore Up Sales For First Lady.
Poor ticket sales for Melania Trump's documentary have reportedly led to a rescue effort by the GOP.
Reports claim that multiple clubs, affiliated with the party to which the first lady's husband, Donald Trump, belongs, have been buying out theater seats in an effort to mask the film's struggles.
Still, the ticket-buying issue appears difficult to escape, as many people are reportedly uninterested in attending Melania Trump's event even when tickets are offered for free.
Melania Trump's Film Struggles To Sell Tickets, As Insiders Expose Alleged Plot To Shore Up Sales For First Lady
Poor ticket sales for the first lady Melania Trump's documentary have reportedly led to a rescue effort by the GOP.www.yahoo.com
*yawn* There are so many more interesting, accomplished, attractive, and famous people out there who would be far better subjects for a biography. Biographies just don't sell, which is why they only seem to be on networks that carry documentaries. "Oppenheimer" was an exception. But then HE matters because of his accomplishments. Melanoma is nothing more than an incurious, boring, plastic gold digger whose only claim to fame is being the spouse of an even bigger grifter. Meh.
I can see that sales pitch. "She's only had 9,000 dicks on her and was only ridden on Sundays!"
She posed naked. She posed naked in bed with at least one other also naked woman. Since these images wouldn't typically be featured on broadcast TV or in mainstream magazines or where children might see them, most people would consider them to be at least somewhat pornographic due to their sexual nature, as opposed to a painting of a nude in an art museum.
Good point. There have been blockbuster movies that are biographical in scope about people who actually matter: Alan Turing, Bob Marley, John Nash, Oppenheimer.
Amazon is obviously just trying to ingratiate themselves with the Trumps by offering them a thinly veiled bribe.
Could you imagine if photos like that of Michelle Obama ever showed up, the outcry and screaming scandal from the right would be outrageous.
In that case, Michelle would never have been allowed to be first lady, and her poor moral choices would have doomed Obama's aspirations to be president.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Agree. The photos of Malaria naked in bed with another naked woman suggested sexual activities. I think most reasonable adults would look at a picture or video of two naked women touching each other intimately, kissing, etc. to be at least "soft" porn.
Accomplished women who seek to be leaders and role models don't make the dubious moral choice of doing soft core porn.Agreed it'd be a money-maker. It's doing well in Russia.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Agreed money is her primary goal, but nothing wrong with enjoying the ride.
