GOP Is Struggling To Give 'Malaria' Tickets Away

lol. You compared yourself to Christ... and we all saw it. You and Trump, together in one thing... You both know what it feels like to be almost crucified, you, Trump and Christ... Sympatico....

Geebus. You do entertain.
You're free to lie, Damo. I know you are working yourself up to a ban. All you need is a single mod to agree and you'll be rid of me.
 
740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments by your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch isn't Rule 14 much less Rule 12C, but you claim I'm guilty of both? Weird.

I actually participate in several intellectual and friendly discussion on JPP. Feel free to ask @AProudLefty@christiefan915 @Cypress @Guno צְבִי @Jade Dragon @Crepitus @LurchAddams @Number Six @ThatOwlWoman@Walt, your own mods @leaningright and @Phantasmal or I can provide links to multiple intellectual conversations on JPP in January alone.

Can your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch point out a single intellectual conversation where they were an active participant and not a troll? Damo, if anyone is guilty of violating Rule #14, it's your alter-ego Legina.

You'll trump up a charge and ban me since that's what you've threatened to do, but all JPP members should know it's a biased and wholly fraudulent contrivance since, as you've done with the Forced Ignore, you will be punishing me for something you let your friends get away with doing.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts.
Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.
Dear Mr. Tiny Penis,

I will put this in large font so one of your "buddies' can cut and paste it in a DM for you.

It was YOU who found yourself in another forced ignore position, not me or anyone else.

Next time, if you are lucky enough to have one,

1. Don't announce to everyone that you are sending out multiple pictures of your dick and then actually do it.
2. Listen when the moderators warn you multiple times to knock off your inappropriate behavior or suffer the consequences that you have brought upon yourself.

3. Stop blaming everyone/anyone else for your own stupidity.
 
What would you have banned me for, Damo? Pissing off your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch? Being better and smarter at memes and trolling than Legina? Posting pictures of men with hand lotion on their faces?

I'm truly curious so that, when you do ban me, I'll have the facts in hand when I go elsewhere, including Twitter. LOL

I swear that you are, by far, the biggest whiner on this forum.
 
740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments by your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch isn't Rule 14 much less Rule 12C, but you claim I'm guilty of both? Weird.

I actually participate in several intellectual and friendly discussion on JPP. Feel free to ask @AProudLefty@christiefan915 @Cypress @Guno צְבִי @Jade Dragon @Crepitus @LurchAddams @Number Six @ThatOwlWoman@Walt, your own mods @leaningright and @Phantasmal or I can provide links to multiple intellectual conversations on JPP in January alone.

Can your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch point out a single intellectual conversation where they were an active participant and not a troll? Damo, if anyone is guilty of violating Rule #14, it's your alter-ego Legina.

You'll trump up a charge and ban me since that's what you've threatened to do, but all JPP members should know it's a biased and wholly fraudulent contrivance since, as you've done with the Forced Ignore, you will be punishing me for something you let your friends get away with doing.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts.
Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.
There is no "language that is sexually violent", etc. in his nickname for you. He also does not post solely for reaction or to stalk. Neither rule applies, even if it really makes you cry.
 
You're free to lie, Damo. I know you are working yourself up to a ban. All you need is a single mod to agree and you'll be rid of me.
lol. Geebus. If I wanted to ban you, you would be banned. Tell us again how I am Pontius Pilate ready to send you to your crucifixion... It really makes it SING....

Sacrificing yourself for... I have no idea what.
 
I actually participate in several intellectual and friendly discussion on JPP.
What you participate in the most is either "woe is me" whining or incessant trolling of other forum members. I almost never see you post anything that is both intellectual and about the thread topic. I know that you're capable of it (because I HAVE seen it before), but it's a VERY rare sighting in comparison to your incessant trolling of other forum users and your incessant whining to Damo about how "unfair" you're being treated about [event of the day].
 
There is no "language that is sexually violent", etc. in his nickname for you. He also does not post solely for reaction or to stalk. Neither rule applies, even if it really makes you cry.
True. No surprise you've chosen to overlook this part of 12C "or is used in a manner to harass other users" and you've completely ignored that @Lionfish is an incendiary troll account while you've threatened to ban me for "Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk."

FWIW, I know you want to ban me and I expect you eventually will do so with "trumped" up charges as you've already threatened to do. I'm simply curious how much of your honor you'll give up to do so in public.
 
FWIW, I know you want to ban me and I expect you eventually will do so with "trumped" up charges as you've already threatened to do. I'm simply curious how much of your honor you'll give up to do so in public.
FWIW. If I wanted to ban you, you would have been banned long ago. I don't like to ban anyone and if there are options short of that, like forced ignore, I utilize them.

Now. If you want to post images that you know will be NSFW, put them in NSFW where they belong. I haven't even asked you not to post them, just to post them where they belong. Your persecution syndrome is noted, and rejected. Cry more about it.

Anyway, believe me. If I don't want someone here I ban them. I ban folks I think are Cultsmasher without a vote, I just ban them for being Cultsmasher....
 
I fondle my socks at night.
9ys56k.jpg


See @Damocles? After you ban me, JPP will have all the Sybils, Groks, Trump Dummies, Mattie Mensa and other MAGAts to keep you company.
Win-Win!!! :thup:
 
lol. Geebus. If I wanted to ban you, you would be banned. Tell us again how I am Pontius Pilate ready to send you to your crucifixion... It really makes it SING....

Sacrificing yourself for... I have no idea what.
Damo, you've already said you wanted to ban me but couldn't get another mod to agree.
 
FWIW. If I wanted to ban you, you would have been banned long ago. I don't like to ban anyone and if there are options short of that, like forced ignore, I utilize them.
QED

The main point is that you want to ban me for doing what your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch has been doing for years without a single word of complaint out of you.

I think that's really, really weird and expect others might think so too. Enjoy your MAGAt echo chamber. Truly. :thup:
 
You're free to lie, Damo. I know you are working yourself up to a ban. All you need is a single mod to agree and you'll be rid of me.
I don't think anybody wants to be rid of you (or want you banned). You CAN intelligently contribute (I've seen it, even if it's only "once in a blue moon"). I think that people simply grow sick of your incessant "line pushing" antics (and your constant complaining to Damo about how Damo chooses to moderate your antics).
 
QED

The main point is that you want to ban me for doing what your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch has been doing for years without a single word of complaint out of you.

I think that's really, really weird and expect others might think so too. Enjoy your MAGAt echo chamber. Truly. :thup:
You mean the "MAGAt echo chamber" with all sorts of leftists freely posting on it??
 
Link us up. I'd love to read me saying that.
The fact you are dishonest enough to deny it is interesting, Damo.

No worries. When you finally get your way, you'll have your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch and your friends below to occupy your echo chamber:
Yeah Communist like you hate free speech.
Trump won in 2020. The DNC stole the election.
I like other guys dicks in an abstract way, in that I'm glad they have them to bring more gods children into existence.

god bless dicks.
Cry some more, leech.

No Rule #14 for them, eh? LOL
 
Back
Top