Holy shit, bitch. Like my girlfriend was sayin' just a minute ago, "this is a long one!".
It really wasn't for you. I know you have the attention span of a three-year-old.
I don't know. I don't remember what we were talking about here.
I know. I really wasn't expecting you be able to follow along. Frankly, I expect that you couldn't read and understand half of what I wrote.
So, I'm going to be serious for a moment. YOU characterize what Good and Pretti were doing was "violently assaulting enforcement officers".
Nope. It was an observation, not a characterization. Words matter, and you should learn them.
Pretti - was face down, unarmed, when the 2 goons shot him 10 or 11 times.
All totally irrelevant. Try again. Discuss his behavior that got himself killed. Obviously if you are going to AVOID discussing everything about how he got himself killed, you won't be able to consider all the things he did to get himself killed.
Everything you have to say that omits Pretti's deliberate actions is dismissed. So far, you have said nothing on the matter.
Lastly - THESE ARE NOT "ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS" boss, these are Gestapo, masked goons accountable to no one.
If this were a debate, you would have just lost.
If Obama had sent masked goons to one of your Proud Boy rallies, you'd be screaming, "Government Tyranny" like the little bitch you are.
Nope.
1. I have no idea who the "Proud Boys" are. Are they central to your argument? If so, you just lost.
2. Obama did send masked goons to round up many more illegal aliens that Trump has, and We the People supported him in that regard. Now, when Trump is doing the exact same thing but to a lesser extent, shits such as yourself are violently assaulting ICE instead of allowing them to do their jobs. Leftists are shits.
So I REJECT [any observations you have to offer]
FTFY. Yeah, I know. It's not like you could ever hold your own in any sort of discussion at the adults' table.
Do you know what an "inverse" is? Of course you don't. Nevermind.
Too funny. I bet you wouldn't be able to define it. That's why you stopped short. Way too funny!
Dude I'm not going to get into your shit with you
I see you are tipping your king. This is your first wise move of the game.
You can feel free to stop. Don't tax your neuron. My post was for the edification of others who might be wondering if your gibberish was worth getting your spittle on their shirts.
Yes, I know. You are a liar. You are a totally dishonest shit, regurgitating exactly what the DNC orders you to believe.
you can call me an antelope.
I don't think that would be true.
I have no clue what you're on about here, bitch. Moving on..
I'll refresh your memory. You claimed that I only post what I post in order to avoid proper nouns. Your argument is false because I don't avoid proper nouns.
Are there any proper nouns in particular you believe I am avoiding?
I support ALL my assertions.
You haven't supported any yet, and this assertion of yours is just your latest unsupported assertion.
You throw shit up with zero sourcing and expect us all to eat it.
I wouldn't expect you to know this, but observations, science, math and empirical evidence don't require sourcing. It was stupid of you to demand it.
The video provides the observations. No sourcing is needed. Your arguments are falsified. Your conclusions are dismissed.
No you don't. If you did you'd apply the same rule to Alex Pretti as you did with Kyle Rittenhouse.
I'm fine with you trying to make a case, but be clear. State your points individually. I realize that you are only capable of vomiting incoherence, but you could ask someone nearby for help.
State your case and I'll tell you why you are mistaken.
YOU SUPPORT FREE MARKETS? NO, YOU DON'T. Trump's tariffs are NOT free trade.
They certainly are. You suck at economics. Ask me how I know.
I'll put it to you this way and hopefully you'll understand; if not, you can ask someone for help.
Suppose you have something to sell, say a book, that you are selling for $7. Now let's say that I am interested in buying that book. Assume that we are not bound by any regulations and that we have a completely free market. Then you decide "Wait a minute! IBDaMann is a piece of shit. I'm going to charge him a $3 tariff just for being the shit that he is."
We still have completely free trade, and if I want to buy that book from you for $7, I'll have to pay your additional $3 tariff.
Please tell me you get it.
Great, teach me something.
The CONSTITUTION says that there are 3 CO-EQUAL branches of government.
The Constitution does not pretend that the three branches are somehow equivalent. They share power.
THERE IS NO CHECK ON TRUMP!!
If this were a debate then you would have lost right here.
The Supreme court has given trump immunity,
False. The Supreme Court does not have the power to give anyone immunity to anything.
congress has laid down for him
Nope. Apparently you haven't been paying attention.
- he's acting like a king and you, bitch are fine with it.
If this were a debate, you would have lost for the third time right here.
You neither understand nor follow the tennants of our Constitution.
Were you going to support you assertion, or are you under the impression that your declaration is sufficient, owing to your omniscience and your omnipotence?
I can FEEEEEL your love fore your fellow man.
No, I've spend enough time with you.
Spent. Yes, please feel free to rest your neuron and to do something else today rather than dedicate precious time and resources trying to understand things that you read.