Gingrich calls for Muslim test

christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: Talk about straw man. Aren't people making threats against the country on a terrorist list already?

I'm having trouble seeing your point. How does this work, when the family is walking through Customs the official asks "are you here to kill us" and they answer "yes" so they're turned back?

Furthermore, for anyone entering the country US law applies so it doesn't matter what they think about Shari'ah law.
Click to expand...

probably not if Obama appointees are in charge of the list.....
 
The Blood of Angry Men said:
Gingrich's words were that the act of visiting a jihadist website should immediately get you a felony sentence. This is not a strawman, that's Gingrich's words.
Click to expand...

really?.....do you think there would have to be a trial so see if they were guilty of visiting a jihadist website?.......did he say there wouldn't be a trial?......did he say, as you implied, that we should charge reporters who were researching stories on jihadist websites?.......I think you should get an immediate sentence for mental incompetency......
 
I'm losing my sense of scale reading this Gingrich crap. How many Americans have Muslims killed in America ? While we're at it, how many Muslims have Americans killed in their own home countries ?
 
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: Talk about straw man. Aren't people making threats against the country on a terrorist list already?

I'm having trouble seeing your point. How does this work, when the family is walking through Customs the official asks "are you here to kill us" and they answer "yes" so they're turned back?

Furthermore, for anyone entering the country US law applies so it doesn't matter what they think about Shari'ah law.
Click to expand...

I believe there is a question on a visa application that asks if you've ever been a member of a terrorist organisation.

Sent from my LENOVO Lenovo K50-t5 Using Ez Forum for Android
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
No way. You almost have to surmise it's a political ploy.
Click to expand...

And here is the ploy, I think:

I think Trump/Newt are putting all their eggs in the national security basket. Hillary wants to allow even more Syrian immigrants in; she wants to protect Muslims from the backlash that never seems to materialize after terrorist attacks.

In contrast, Trump wants to, somehow or other, restrict said immigration; and somehow or other, start trying to weed out the bad Muslim apples from the good. However it ends up policy wise, it won't be as stated in the rhetoric---because the constitution precludes it. But however it ends up it will be a stronger stance than what we have presently. And I suspect a lot of Trump voters get it.

And that's a pretty stark contrast in terms of national security. Voters will be presented with a very clear choice in November.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
really?.....do you think there would have to be a trial so see if they were guilty of visiting a jihadist website?.......did he say there wouldn't be a trial?......did he say, as you implied, that we should charge reporters who were researching stories on jihadist websites?.......I think you should get an immediate sentence for mental incompetency......
Click to expand...

He said that people who visit jihadist websites should be immediately charged with a felony. Reporters are people. There is no need for a specific mention of reporters, his statement was logically inconclusive of them.
 
The Blood of Angry Men said:
Where the hell are you supposed to deport an American citizen to? You deport someone to the land where they hold citizenship. The only place to deport an American citizen to is right back to America. We can't force another country to accept a person who's never stepped foot in that country before. This is retarded.

Let's deport Newt Gingrich.
Click to expand...

Tell Canada & Mexico it is part of NAFTA, they won't suspect anything.. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Looks like the newt was a bit to late, he missed the VP spot, he should have come out w/ the bull shit a few days ago...
 
Leonthecat said:
I don't believe that Gingrich is so stupid, as to think that any of the measures he proposes could be implemented, or even taken seriously.
He is playing down to the Fox audience to rile them up. Fox watchers are stupid enough to believe any of what he said could be constitutional.
He has had a history of saying just this kind of hogwash for effect.
Judging by the response of JPP cons, it works.
Click to expand...

Well maybe after trump & him declare Martial law then they move to disarm the Muslims, then the Mexicans, well then might as well get those liberals, Jews, gays & angry women, oh & them evil media folk........:mad:
 
Bill said:
Well maybe after trump & him declare Martial law then they move to disarm the Muslims, then the Mexicans, well then might as well get those liberals, Jews, gays & angry women, oh & them evil media folk........:mad:
Click to expand...

liberals should definitely be first.....
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Would you be ok with making Muslims disavow the brand of Sharia that pertains to non-Muslims before we allow them in the country?
Click to expand...
This is just such a stupid debate. Sharia is not the law of the land. US Muslims are free to practice Sharia all they want within our system of law. Since it's a protected religious right your idea would be a religious test which are specifically prohibited by the US Constitution. It's that damned freedom thing again. Dog gone it people get to practice it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top