George Zimmerman: May Face Death Penalty

That's true because he followed this kid and killed him. Darla is so fucked up that way, but what are you going to do?

It should be interesting to see all of this evidence that the prosecutor presented to the court though, that has not been released. I am sure it will totally clear him and that's why the prosecutor presented it. You know how they are.

You left out some info between the follow and kill part.
Like he was "following" so he could find an address, he stopped, he walked back towards his car, Martin approached him, Martin attacked him, etc.
 
He has a clear history of calling the police on people for no reason. You do harass people. If someone disagrees with you, you never just drop it. You do realize people are going to disagree?

Now you're lying out of your ass; but I digress.
Provide proof that he "...has a clear history of calling the police on people for no reason..."; unless you're just being a bitch about this.
 
See this is what I mean. I told u like 5 thousand times my position, and you keep doing this crap. You just won't be happy until my position is your position.

Read cawackos first paragraph again. That is exactly why it simply cannot be self defense. This isn't rocket science. This is you pushing and pushing trying to wear me down.

But....but men always do that to women. :)
 
Yes he's guilty because if had not been a mentally disturbed wanna be Martin would be alive. Those are all the facts needed for me. But since I am not on the jury I am hurting no one by HAVING A FUCKING OPINION MONKEYBOY

Between you and Zimmerman, you're the only one who exhibits the behavior of a mentally disturbed person.
 
That's not possible. Period. Cawacko even said something very similar when this first happened. This really is not an unfathomable position. Your histrionics have just made it seem so.
That wasn't what he asked you and yet you appear to be scared to answer the question.
hmmmm
 
He is guilty of killing him, who else did it? Trayvon shoot himself? It is just to be determined if it was self defense or manslaughter. Zimmerman has never denied killing Trayvon.

If it is found that Zimmerman was acting in self defense, then the responsibility for Martin's death falls directly on Martin.
 
The gun didn't 'go off'. It was deliberately fired. You want to split hairs on whether to call the deliberate firing of the gun and killing him 'murder', 'killing', 'manslaughter', etc., etc. That's what the court's going to do after sifting through all the evidence, then come up with a verdict. Either way, the kid's dead and the kid didn't do anything wrong. The rest of whatever is revealed doesn't change that.

How do you know the "kid" didn't do anything wrong?
Were you present?
Do you have access to information that the rest of the public doesn't?
Or, is this just a FEELING that you're trying to promote as fact?
 
I think Cawacko still feels the same way he just doesn't like the hassle. He's like that. I still feel the same way. The new information, I guess you must mean the "I'm not guility it was the victim's fault!" defense? Yeah, that' never happens. I don't know why that hasn't swayed me. I'm a difficult bitch that way.

It's all the facts anyone ever needed. If he had stayed in his fucking car instead of acting like, at best, a punk, a 17 yo gets to have a life. You know, like me and you got. End. Of. Story.

If the "17 yo" hadn't acted like a thug, he would still be alive. End of story.
 
And this is what it will boil down to. There are a few witnesses who weren't impressed with the police's efforts to get them to change their accounts of the incident, but more than likely, the case may hinge on Zimmerman's statements.

And that could be a problem, because Zimmerman has already lied under oath. I believe the state will paint Zimmerman as a liar.

Would you happen to have proof of this "lied under oath", or do you just FEEL that he did?
 
yeah, the rabble often make up their minds on this stuff quicker than who they choose for who they want to win american idol.

Does that explain the immediate and repeated assertions by righties that he's innocent?
 
Back
Top