Garrett Foster Brought His Gun to Austin Protests. Then He Was Shot Dead.

How does your first sentence change the validity of what I just said, my little alt right parrot? Your 2nd and 3rd sentences are wishful thinking.

You don't get to speak for the driver or his intent. You don't know what his 'original path' was, or if he even had one in mind that was different than the one he took. The path he took IS his original path.
 
Had your hero NOT MADE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO TURN HIS CAR INTO THE CROWD AND CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONFRONTED.

What are YOU going to do if some jackass tries to bowl you over with his car when you are ORIGINALLY NOT BLOCKING HIS PATH? You would have probably opened fire...clearly the demonstrators have better sense and discipline than you, as despite all of this there were no riots or escalating gun fire.

Keep in mind that according to the left civilians do not need full auto weapons or the next best thing. Your yahoo didn't have one, now did he?

The driver is guilty of trying to incite a riot and manslaughter one, as the video clearly demonstrates.

Tough luck toodles, you haven't a leg to stand on....bigots seldom do.

If I am in the middle of the road kicking and hitting cars ...I would expect I might be hit by one, and if i have a AR 15 in hand maybe shot!

If I was walking though a Walmart parking lot with an AR 15 I may get shot

You still have not addressed why he was on the road with a Military weapon
 
Ahh, but as the record shows, prior to the yahoo's intervention, there was no riot happening.
Lie.
Peaceful,
Attacking an occupied car is NOT peaceful.
no violence,
Attacking an occupied car is violence. For that matter, attacking any car is violence.
demonstrators.
They were not demonstrating anything, except how violent they were.
...If you have proof to the contrary, produce it.
Done.
If not, save your revisionist lies for the next pointy hood meeting. "Zeig heil", baby! ;)
I am not a Democrat or a Socialist, idiot.
 
Dude, I never figured you for a closet gun-banning liberal.

Im not

Just pointing out that these POS Libs scream about how no one needs an AR 15. And the people that own them must have small dicks etc

But yet they support this dead POS Lib that was on a public street brandishing the evil AR 15
 
Im not

Just pointing out that these POS Libs scream about how no one needs an AR 15. And the people that own them must have small dicks etc

But yet they support this dead POS Lib that was on a public street brandishing the evil AR 15
Fuck the Goddamn Liberals, I'm talking about you. Anytime someone suggests a person doesn't have the right to defend themselves with a firearm, they reek of liberal gun-banning and you have that reek by suggesting that an American didn't have the right to defend himself against some asshole who just drove his car into a group of people.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/garrett-foster-brought-gun-austin-114325700.html

A happy ending!

Hint to the idiot...do not block traffic and approch cars while holding a gun
Is there any doubt you'd be spouting this same liberal gun-banning crap if someone drove into the protesters at Lansing, MI?
 
Fuck the Goddamn Liberals, I'm talking about you. Anytime someone suggests a person doesn't have the right to defend themselves with a firearm, they reek of liberal gun-banning and you have that reek by suggesting that an American didn't have the right to defend himself against some asshole who just drove his car into a group of people.

Is there any doubt you'd be spouting this same liberal gun-banning crap if someone drove into the protesters at Lansing, MI?

The protesters in the road were breaking the law, not the guy in the road in a car
 
The protesters in the road were breaking the law, not the guy in the road in a car
How does this justify your liberal gun-grabbing bullshit even if it was true?

Are you seriously claiming that the driver had a right to drive into people on the road?
 
How does this justify your liberal gun-grabbing bullshit even if it was true?

Are you seriously claiming that the driver had a right to drive into people on the road?

Are you seriously claiming that the protesters had a right to block the road pound on his car and walk up on him with a gun?

Notice he shot the guy with the AR 15 and no one else
 
Are you seriously claiming that the protesters had a right to block the road pound on his car and walk up on him with a gun?

Notice he shot the guy with the AR 15 and no one else
I don't know if the protesters were legal or not, but in this case it's irrelevant since the drive did not have right to drive into a crowd. He committed assault on the crowd with a deadly weapon. When the crowd reacted he murdered an American. I don't know how many shots were fired or who else was hit. The courts will figure it out, but I think that asshole is going down for murder.

What does this have to do with your liberal gun-grabbing? Besides, anyone who chooses an AR-15 over an AK-47 if a fucking idiot. The .223/5.56 is a shitty hunting round. The 7.62x39 is much better for brush hunting and out to 200 yards for hunting (one shot, one kill, no chasing around in the bushes following blood trails).
 
Notice how he states if he uses his AK 47 on the Cops hes dead...uses it on Cops, but what about a private citizen sounds like he had no fear of death on that. He states people are pussies to do anything about his AK47...well he pointed his AK at the wrong pussy







Didn't protesters open fire on a car in Atlanta...yup think so! This guy in the car could have been the next victim
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
How does your first sentence change the validity of what I just said, my little alt right parrot? Your 2nd and 3rd sentences are wishful thinking.


You don't get to speak for the driver or his intent. You don't know what his 'original path' was, or if he even had one in mind that was different than the one he took. The path he took IS his original path.

I get to speak on his ACTIONS, you silly alt-right parrot. By your own proposed "logic" if he didn't even have a path in mind, wtf was he doing? Just cruising around? And if that's so, why would he CHOOSE to go down a crowded street that would offer traffic back up? Then he's going to get belligerent and drive into the crowd? No matter how you dance, Polly, the song is the same.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Had your hero NOT MADE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO TURN HIS CAR INTO THE CROWD AND CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONFRONTED.

What are YOU going to do if some jackass tries to bowl you over with his car when you are ORIGINALLY NOT BLOCKING HIS PATH? You would have probably opened fire...clearly the demonstrators have better sense and discipline than you, as despite all of this there were no riots or escalating gun fire.

Keep in mind that according to the left civilians do not need full auto weapons or the next best thing. Your yahoo didn't have one, now did he?

The driver is guilty of trying to incite a riot and manslaughter one, as the video clearly demonstrates.

Tough luck toodles, you haven't a leg to stand on....bigots seldom do.


If I am in the middle of the road kicking and hitting cars ...I would expect I might be hit by one, and if i have a AR 15 in hand maybe shot!

If I was walking though a Walmart parking lot with an AR 15 I may get shot

You still have not addressed why he was on the road with a Military weapon

In typical intellectual dishonesty of the alt-right mindset, you just leave out those little details that derail your myopic recall. Once more for the intellectually impotent:

Had your hero NOT MADE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO TURN HIS CAR INTO THE CROWD AND CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONFRONTED.

Your second sentence is just blowing smoke that is NOT relative to the events being discussed.

Your 3rd sentence is for the cops and local courts to deal with. Pretty hypocritical of folk like you to try and now suddenly be concerned about AR-15's in the general population after advocating for just that. Now, since black folk take advantage of a situation that YOU and your ilk previously advocating for, you've got an issue? Puh-leeze!
 
In Texas a lot of people legally carry weapons in their cars. You would be smart to always be courteous when you approach a motorist. Apparently he was not.
 
Back
Top