Garrett Foster Brought His Gun to Austin Protests. Then He Was Shot Dead.

[Taichiliberal]

Notice how he states if he uses his AK 47 on the Cops hes dead...uses it on Cops, but what about a private citizen sounds like he had no fear of death on that. He states people are pussies to do anything about his AK47...well he pointed his AK at the wrong pussy

Didn't protesters open fire on a car in Atlanta...yup think so! This guy in the car could have been the next victim

And once again our resident right wing wonk adds his supposition and conjecture onto a video that DOES NOT SAY WHAT OUR RIGHT WING WONK CONCLUDES.

Where was Volsrock similar analysis when right wing militia men were carrying same/similar weapons to town halls, to protest outside municipal buildings, to "defend" an illegal cattle drive or to occupy a federal land office?

GMAFB, you 3rd rate propagandist.

 

[Taichiliberal]

In Texas a lot of people legally carry weapons in their cars. You would be smart to always be courteous when you approach a motorist. Apparently he was not.

apparently he's an asshole who committed murder, but might get off in Texas if your mindset prevails.

 

[Taichiliberal]

The protesters did not have to block the road! Problem solved

I'd like to see you say that at the next right wing yahoos who bring guns and block up traffic to a protest. And when they get their asses shot off, don't you dare try to shovel your hypocrisy.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahh, but as the record shows, prior to the yahoo's intervention, there was no riot happening.

Lie.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Peaceful,

Attacking an occupied car is NOT peaceful.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
no violence,

Attacking an occupied car is violence. For that matter, attacking any car is violence.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
demonstrators.

They were not demonstrating anything, except how violent they were.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
...If you have proof to the contrary, produce it.

Done.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
If not, save your revisionist lies for the next pointy hood meeting. "Zeig heil", baby!

I am not a Democrat or a Socialist, idiot.

1. Yes, you are. Read 'em and weep: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/what-we-know-about-the-austin-blm-protest-shooting.html

2. The car driver started it, genius...aggressively drove into the crowd. A matter of fact, a matter of history that just burns your alt-right butt no matter how much you squawk lies.

3. See #2 you silly parrot.

4. A intellectually dishonest and impotent response. Read the link on #1.

5. Where? All I see is your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture...those are not valid, documented facts.

6. Neither were the Nazi's, you simpleton. Nor are their current neo-Nazi/white supremacist & separatist offspring in America. You talk the talk, you get the label. For your education:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party

 

[Into the Night]

I don't know if the protesters were legal or not, but in this case it's irrelevant since the drive did not have right to drive into a crowd. He committed assault on the crowd with a deadly weapon. When the crowd reacted he murdered an American. I don't know how many shots were fired or who else was hit. The courts will figure it out, but I think that asshole is going down for murder.

What does this have to do with your liberal gun-grabbing? Besides, anyone who chooses an AR-15 over an AK-47 if a fucking idiot. The .223/5.56 is a shitty hunting round. The 7.62x39 is much better for brush hunting and out to 200 yards for hunting (one shot, one kill, no chasing around in the bushes following blood trails).

Guess you're a lousy hunter. Both rounds are effective at hunting. One shot one kill. Even with a bow and arrow.

 

[Into the Night]

True. If they were illegally blocking the road they should be cited....and the driver of the car charged and convicted of murder just like James Fields, "the other white meat". <---anyone catch the pork reference?


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ing-heather-heyer-unite-the-right/1587233001/

Cited by who? The police are ordered to stand down.

They are illegally blocking the road. They are breaking the law. They are attacking federal property. They are vandalizing everything in sight. Where are the police? The idiot mayor ordered them to stand down. Where are the State police? The idiot governor ordered them to stand down and supports the idiot mayor.

Voters are going to remember this in November.

 

[Into the Night]

I get to speak on his ACTIONS, you silly alt-right parrot.

You are not speaking for his actions. You are speaking about his intent, liar. You don't get to speak for the driver. You only get to speak for you.

By your own proposed "logic" if he didn't even have a path in mind, wtf was he doing?

Irrelevant.

Just cruising around?

Irrelevant.

And if that's so, why would he CHOOSE to go down a crowded street that would offer traffic back up?

Irrelevant. He did. He made a lawful choice.

Then he's going to get belligerent and drive into the crowd?

He didn't. The crowd surrounded him. When he feared for his safety, he became a belligerent and shot the man with the rifle in self defense.

No matter how you dance, Polly, the song is the same.

Parrots can dance fairly well. It's rather amusing to watch them do it. They seem to like most any song, but they do seem to favor dance music with a good beat to it.

 

[Into the Night]

Polly seems to be incapable of mounting a logical response, so his/her little brain is stuck on repeat. Squawk, Polly, squawk.

Denial of logic.

 

[Into the Night]

In typical intellectual dishonesty of the alt-right mindset, you just leave out those little details that derail your myopic recall. Once more for the intellectually impotent:

Had your hero NOT MADE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO TURN HIS CAR INTO THE CROWD AND CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CONFRONTED.

Your second sentence is just blowing smoke that is NOT relative to the events being discussed.

Your 3rd sentence is for the cops and local courts to deal with. Pretty hypocritical of folk like you to try and now suddenly be concerned about AR-15's in the general population after advocating for just that. Now, since black folk take advantage of a situation that YOU and your ilk previously advocating for, you've got an issue? Puh-leeze!

The driver did not drive over any protestor.

 

[Into the Night]

In Texas a lot of people legally carry weapons in their cars. You would be smart to always be courteous when you approach a motorist. Apparently he was not.

Apparently not. This poor sap that got shot made a lot of stupid decisions that day.

 

[Into the Night]

And once again our resident right wing wonk adds his supposition and conjecture onto a video that DOES NOT SAY WHAT OUR RIGHT WING WONK CONCLUDES.

Where was Volsrock similar analysis when right wing militia men were carrying same/similar weapons to town halls, to protest outside municipal buildings, to "defend" an illegal cattle drive or to occupy a federal land office?

GMAFB, you 3rd rate propagandist.

Inversion fallacy. The driver was lawfully driving his car. He broke no law. The rioters were breaking the law. They were occupying a street. They were causing violence and mayhem. They attacked his car. A man that was part of the rioting crowd approached the car with a rifle. The driver was in fear for his life and safety. The shooting was in self defense.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Guess you're a lousy hunter. Both rounds are effective at hunting. One shot one kill. Even with a bow and arrow.

It's a little different than on your video games, Nighty. A .223 is illegal to hunt large game with in many states simply because it's too small. Sure. even a rimfire .22 will take down a grizzly bear if you shoot him in the eye, through the optic nerve hole into the brain, but I wouldn't bet my life on that shot. Mainly it's a matter of ethics and humanely harvesting game. A slight miss or deflection from a small branch could only wound the game causing needless suffering....and possibly a long chase. Unless you're one of those who don't give a fuck.

In war, a 5.56 is fine. The objective is to neutralize the enemy's ability to fight. A limb shot is just as good as a kill if it takes them out of action. Even better if another enemy or two have to take care of him/her. Hunting is different because a quick kill is the goal. Drop them where they stand. Accuracy is the main method, but a suitably large caliber round is the best backup.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Cited by who? The police are ordered to stand down.

They are illegally blocking the road. They are breaking the law. They are attacking federal property. They are vandalizing everything in sight. Where are the police? The idiot mayor ordered them to stand down. Where are the State police? The idiot governor ordered them to stand down and supports the idiot mayor.

Voters are going to remember this in November.

Regardless, the driver committed a crime by driving into a crowd of Americans. I'm guessing this clown will be charged with murder.

 

[Into the Night]

I'd like to see you say that at the next right wing yahoos who bring guns and block up traffic to a protest. And when they get their asses shot off, don't you dare try to shovel your hypocrisy.

They don't block traffic. They respect the law.

 

[Lightbringer]

Did anyone actually see the video when this was first reported?

It wasn't what I saw that bothered me it was what I heard. The first shots I heard were from an AK. 7.62 rounds. Then I heard 3 or 4 smaller caliber shots. The dipshit with the AK that the media seems to want to make into a victim fired first. Good riddance.

 

[Into the Night]

1. Yes, you are. Read 'em and weep: ...deleted Holy Link...

Insult fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

2. The car driver started it, genius...aggressively drove into the crowd. A matter of fact, a matter of history that just burns your alt-right butt no matter how much you squawk lies.

Nope. The car was lawfully on a public street. The rioters started it.

3. See #2 you silly parrot.

Insult fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

4. A intellectually dishonest and impotent response. Read the link on #1.

Insult fallacies. Buzzword fallacy.

5. Where? All I see is your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture...those are not valid, documented facts.

City of Austin police records. State of Texas law.

6. Neither were the Nazi's, you simpleton. Nor are their current neo-Nazi/white supremacist & separatist offspring in America. You talk the talk, you get the label. For your education:

Insult fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

...deleted Holy Link...

Wikipedia is not a valid source. They do not own the word 'Nazi'. They do not define it.

Again, you demonstrate that you cannot think for yourself. All you can do is cut and paste the arguments of others, stealing them as your own arguments. You are a nothing.

 

[Into the Night]

It's a little different than on your video games, Nighty.

What video games?

A .223 is illegal to hunt large game with in many states simply because it's too small.

Nope. Just a few States...and getting fewer.

Sure. even a rimfire .22 will take down a grizzly bear if you shoot him in the eye, through the optic nerve hole into the brain, but I wouldn't bet my life on that shot.

Quite a few bears have been taken down with a .22. Even a .22 pistol. The largest grizzly bear ever taken was taken down by a .22 rifle.

Mainly it's a matter of ethics and humanely harvesting game.

Learn to shoot, twit.

A slight miss or deflection from a small branch could only wound the game causing needless suffering....and possibly a long chase. Unless you're one of those who don't give a fuck.

You obviously don't give a fuck, shooting at something without having a clear shot and not knowing what is behind it. You're dangerous as a hunter.

In war, a 5.56 is fine.

So is a .22.

The objective is to neutralize the enemy's ability to fight.

WRONG. The objective in war is to convince the enemy that continued war is futile.

A limb shot is just as good as a kill if it takes them out of action. Even better if another enemy or two have to take care of him/her.

Why are you bringing up strawmen? This event is neither open war nor hunting.

...deleted strawmen...

You're not only a lousy hunter, you'd be dangerous in the field. I sure hope you don't kill someone with your carelessness.

 

[Into the Night]

Regardless, the driver committed a crime by driving into a crowd of Americans. I'm guessing this clown will be charged with murder.

Nope. He is not going to be charged.

 

[Lightbringer]

Nope. He is not going to be charged.

Self-defense.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

They don't block traffic. They respect the law.

They did block traffic by jamming up the roads.