Economics: Liberal style

Last edited by Ice Dancer; Today at 09:45 AM.

why would nigel lie about something like this? i expect it from lesion troll, but nigel....wtf?


Seriously? Read what I quoted and then read her revised post. She changed it while I was responding and then lied about it.
 
Actually, no. I read the information provided at the second link and it says absolutely nothing about fraud in the food stamp program. I asked ID to quote the relevant portion for me but she declined.

No she did not demure she pointed out that just as you were too stupid to see the second link you are likewise too stupid to read far enough into the article to see the portion on food stamp fraud.
 
Last edited by Ice Dancer; Today at 09:45 AM.

why would nigel lie about something like this? i expect it from lesion troll, but nigel....wtf?

Well Nigey has a new best friend. Doesn't matter it's the Lesion Troll, Butt Dancer, but heck. You see what lengths he'll go to avoid answering a question, or debating the facts.
 
Seriously? Read what I quoted and then read her revised post. She changed it while I was responding and then lied about it.

You did not quote my post in its entirety nigey you parsed part of it into quote boxes; and that was 5 fucking minutes AFTER I ediited my post!
 
Seriously? Read what I quoted and then read her revised post. She changed it while I was responding and then lied about it.

No she didn't. She ran the links together and then separated them by hitting return when she saw her error. If you want to call that changing it, so be it. You got major wood over this so please have at it Nigey. I can see you need it.

You still can't refute the facts because the second link most certainly does mention food stamp fraud, doofus.
 
She meant 'demur' but is too stupid to spell it correctly.

With pals like JamieLee Wanna-be and the Yurtle who needs enemies?

Can you imagine the frantic PMs the liar sent out; "MAYDAY! help, I'm getting pwned becaue I got caught lying"....

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
You did not quote my post in its entirety nigey you parsed part of it into quote boxes; and that was 5 fucking minutes AFTER I ediited my post!


So your story is that I not only eliminated the second link but I also changed the wording of you post as part of my grand plan to do what exactly?
 
It's alright Nigey. We can see it's too hard for you to admit you didn't scroll down far enough in the second link. We still think there's hope for you yet. Chin up!

You must have been moving your lips frantically while you desperately searched the added second link for any reference to food stamps...

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
No she didn't. She ran the links together and then separated them by hitting return when she saw her error. If you want to call that changing it, so be it. You got major wood over this so please have at it Nigey. I can see you need it.

Um, no.

You still can't refute the facts because the second link most certainly does mention food stamp fraud, doofus.

And we have a third contestant in the post a quote challenge. Post the quote, hombre.
 
So your story is that I not only eliminated the second link but I also changed the wording of you post as part of my grand plan to do what exactly?

I personally think you need to just brush up on your typing skills and it won't take you so effing long to respond to a post like this one took you. 10 minutes Nigey! Also, you might want to have Damo mention somewhere in the rules here that when posters reply to you, they are not allowed to make an edit under any ciurcumstances because it causes your head to explode end you and up doing a butt dance with the Lesion Troll, Butt Dancer.

Good job Nigey!
 
So your story is that I not only eliminated the second link but I also changed the wording of you post as part of my grand plan to do what exactly?

There you go again! I never said you changed any wording I said you parsed my quote into quote boxes...and no you did not quote it in its entirety. I think you just stupidly did not read the second quote just like you stupidly couldn't find the section on welfare fraud in it! The real head scratcher though is your idiocy over the fact that my edit took place 5 entire fucking minutes before you posted to it!
 
I personally think you need to just brush up on your typing skills and it won't take you so effing long to respond to a post like this one took you. 10 minutes Nigey! Also, you might want to have Damo mention somewhere in the rules here that when posters reply to you, they are not allowed to make an edit under any ciurcumstances because it causes your head to explode end you and up doing a butt dance with the Lesion Troll, Butt Dancer.

Good job Nigey!


At least you understand that she changed the post and lied about it. I'll take what I can get from you numbskulls.


Edit: And I couldn't care less that she edited the post. I do it all the time. It's the lying, the lying that is really weird. I don't get it. It's a basic lack of integrity. I mean, who the fuck would lie about something like that? What kind of fucking weirdo does that?
 
Um, no.



And we have a third contestant in the post a quote challenge. Post the quote, hombre.

The quote was in the link, shit for brains.Fraud and Abuse in Federal Programs
Printby Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven

August 2009


Many other federal programs suffer from substantial fraud and abuse. The data cited in the following bullets are from a 2009 GAO report on improper payments, unless otherwise noted:63

•Food Stamps. This welfare program is a target for fraud because it is so large and complex. The government must keep track of millions of individuals to accurately document their eligibility while keeping tabs on the 160,000 retailers who deal in food stamps to look for illegal trafficking. In the past, the program spawned a huge black market as recipients exchanged their food stamps for cash on the street. Today, food stamps are issued on electronic cards, and fraud levels have been reduced. Nonetheless, the program’s improper payment rate is still about 6 percent, costing taxpayers about $1.7 billion annually.
 
There you go again! I never said you changed any wording I said you parsed my quote into quote boxes...and no you did not quote it in its entirety. I think you just stupidly did not read the second quote just like you stupidly couldn't find the section on welfare fraud in it! The real head scratcher though is your idiocy over the fact that my edit took place 5 entire fucking minutes before you posted to it!


Well, my dimwitted friend. For your story to be true, I would have had to change the wording of your post from "Here's just one Article" to "Here's one article" in addition to omitting the second link. But you know, and I know and everyone else ought to know that it never happened.

Liar.
 
Back
Top