E Jean Carrol case stands! Appeal denied.

Yakuda said:
What year did this supposed sexual assault happen?
Click to expand...

The dozy bitch can't even remember that ffs!!

The statute of limitations in E. Jean Carroll's case against Donald Trump was potentially extended by the New York Adult Survivors Act. This law allows victims of sexual assault to sue their abusers despite the original statute of limitations having passed. Carroll's second lawsuit, filed in November 2022 (referred to as Carroll II), included a battery claim under this Act, which was the basis of the trial in April 2023.
 
Cypress said:
The judge in the case said sexual assault was at the heart of the case, along with libel.

That's why all those women were called to testify under oath about their own experiences with sexual assault by Trump.
Click to expand...
Leftist judges say a lot of whackadoo bullshit in case you haven't noticed. Starting even before they are confirmed as judges based on senate confirmation hearings.
 
serendipity said:
The dozy bitch can't even remember that ffs!!

The statute of limitations in E. Jean Carroll's case against Donald Trump was potentially extended by the New York Adult Survivors Act. This law allows victims of sexual assault to sue their abusers despite the original statute of limitations having passed. Carroll's second lawsuit, filed in November 2022 (referred to as Carroll II), included a battery claim under this Act, which was the basis of the trial in April 2023.
Click to expand...
And the adult survivor act has since expired returning the statue of limitations to what it was previously
 
Jarod said:
Yes, there were federal issues. What is the federal issue in TACO's sexual assault case.
Click to expand...
What issue did he use to appeal to the Federal courts to begin with? You're the attorney... . I know what issue he used, the question is do you? School us up, expert. You keep asking for stuff you should know, since you are an attorney... Since Federal courts have actually ruled in this matter, that means that there has been a federal issue discussed.
 
serendipity said:
The dozy bitch can't even remember that ffs!!

The statute of limitations in E. Jean Carroll's case against Donald Trump was potentially extended by the New York Adult Survivors Act. This law allows victims of sexual assault to sue their abusers despite the original statute of limitations having passed. Carroll's second lawsuit, filed in November 2022 (referred to as Carroll II), included a battery claim under this Act, which was the basis of the trial in April 2023.
Click to expand...
So you think he should have gotten away with it. Of course you do.
 
Damocles said:
What issue did he use to appeal to the Federal courts to begin with? You're the attorney... . I know what issue he used, the question is do you? School us up, expert. You keep asking for stuff you should know, since you are an attorney... Since Federal courts have actually ruled in this matter, that means that there has been a federal issue discussed.
Click to expand...
I have not looked at that issue and am not informed, if you tell me the issue I could opine on it.

Attorneys do not know everything about every case. The Federal courts denied the case from my understanding.
 
Jarod said:
I have not looked at that issue and am not informed, if you tell me the issue I could opine on it.

Attorneys do not know everything about every case. The Federal courts denied the case from my understanding.
Click to expand...
It didn't take much work to find out what claims they used, your ignorance is purposeful. Pretending that you "can't imagine" what "federal issue" they could possibly use to go before the SCOTUS, but you seem to forget that Federal Courts are not in the habit of taking up States' cases either, and your OP story shows that one ruled, the other chose not to hear it, and that it is being appealed.

I simply do not believe you are that incapable, and your own "questions" have to ignore information you provided to be even remotely an actual question.
 
Yakuda said:
You don't even remember what you wrote do you?
Click to expand...
Can you answer?
Damocles said:
It didn't take much work to find out what claims they used, your ignorance is purposeful. Pretending that you "can't imagine" what "federal issue" they could possibly use to go before the SCOTUS, but you seem to forget that Federal Courts are not in the habit of taking up States' cases either, and your OP story shows that one ruled, the other chose not to hear it, and that it is being appealed.

I simply do not believe you are that incapable, and your own "questions" have to ignore information you provided to be even remotely an actual question.
Click to expand...
I did not say I cant imagine. Why put so many words in my mouth? I can imagine some, I want to know what exist and why the person I am asking thinks the Supreme Court would consider them.
 
LOL

An appeals court will consider Friday whether the $5 million judgment against former President Donald Trump in writer E. Jean Carroll’s first trial against him should stand, the first of two multi-million fines he’s been ordered to pay in Carroll’s defamation cases—which have kept accruing millions in interest as Trump’s appeals have played out, adding up to over $90 million.
 
Jarod said:
State Cases can go to the federal courts, IF there is a federal issue. I do not see a federal issue here. Maybe I missed something.
Click to expand...
Right... Here is where you made it clear to me that you could not imagine what they might use. You even suggested in another post that other states' issues that were before the SCOTUS had a federal issue, but on this one you just couldn't see it. Yet, Federal courts have listened and ruled and it wasn't difficult to figure out what issues they were bringing... Unless you are an attorney and believe folks will just listen to you without regard to the fact that information is available showing you to be a blowhard.
 
鬼百合 said:
LOL

An appeals court will consider Friday whether the $5 million judgment against former President Donald Trump in writer E. Jean Carroll’s first trial against him should stand, the first of two multi-million fines he’s been ordered to pay in Carroll’s defamation cases—which have kept accruing millions in interest as Trump’s appeals have played out, adding up to over $90 million.
Click to expand...
Don't bet on that interest ever being paid... Aside from that, statutory interest is about 8% and over two years or so that amounts to just shy of $1 million so the most the interest + principle would be, at this point, is about $6 million.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top