she's 520 ( or so) pledged delegates short going into next Tuesday. not counting supers either way.
You are incorrect, she needs about 274 more delegates, without the Supers.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/
she's 520 ( or so) pledged delegates short going into next Tuesday. not counting supers either way.
2383 to win..correct?You are incorrect, she needs about 274 more delegates, without the Supers.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/
2383 to win..correct?
what figure do you show for her? (pledged?)
Explain the math to me? How can winning California save Sanders chances? Remember California is a proportional State.
It changes the trajectory dramatically and if the DNA feels that it places too much risk of a loss in novenber, they will put up someone more likely to prevail.
Shouldn't count on rules prevailing over fear.
I wish, but it aint going to happen... despite what Rush Linberger says.
You don't listen much to left wing sources if you think only Rush is talking about it
I wish, but it aint going to happen... despite what Rush Linberger says.
Its true I don't... citation?
None of those mean there will be an insurrection at the Convention.
Sanders himself has said he is against Superdelegates overturning the will of the majority of the voters.
Id say that's not a fair assessment at all. I'd say the Bernie supporters on here have reasonably managed their expectations.So being the good right-winger I am I was listening to my KPFA Berkeley Free Speech Radio today and the topic was Bernie and that he still has a chance. They did say MSNBC told some Bernie people they were prepared to call the race on the 6th or the 7th for Hillary before voting had been completed in California. And they acknowledged it would probably suppress voting.
On Facebook or rare occasions like this I still read/listen to passionate Bernie supporters who haven't given up and want to fight this all the way to the convention. Clearly this board is different as several people said they support Bernie but don't seem to care much about him (in terms of wanting him to win or his supposed revolution).
Many are young, do not understand well the political process, have unrealistic expectatations. They seriously undermine Bernies ability to influence party politics, and with the coalition he's built, it's considerable. They need to chill the hell out.I haven't paid attention. These people were passionate though on the radio today. The opposite of this board.
true. but more nuanced he said the supers should follow the will of the people state by state..None of those mean there will be an insurrection at the Convention.
Sanders himself has said he is against Superdelegates overturning the will of the majority of the voters.
You can read my OP. KPFA spoke on it yesterday. I follow my left wing Bernie supporting friends on Facebook that talk about this stuff. These are the people down with Bernie.
you had it correct before the primarys even started.So any predictions?
I am confident in mine, I gave it long ago.... HRC will be the Democratic nominee.
Well I'm sure Bernie would like that but these are primaries and caucuses and not elections. The parties have no obligation to do as he suggest and, in fact, his claim that primaries and caucuses should reflect the will of the people is spurious reasoning as the restrictions the parties place on political primaries and caucuses mean they absolutely cannot reflect the will of the people. Bernie has failed to build a political base with party leaders and thus the disparity in super delegates. That's Bernies fault and not the political process.true. but more nuanced he said the supers should follow the will of the people state by state..
I think it was WV (?) where he won almost all the elected delegates, but came out even with Hillary because almost all the supers went with her.
Of course this is not the only ex.