Do Cons belive its time to take up arms?

The min some orginized group attempts to use violence against our elected government, they will loose any and all popular support.

Consider the dude who reciently flew his plane into an IRS building.
 
Except in their fantasies...

Funny how if you suggested killing an American soldier or taking up arms against America when Republicans were in power they would be all over you calling you unpatirotic and unamerican and such, but just because folks they dont agree with are in power...

They feel completly justified advocating taking up arms against our Nation!

dumbass, some of us were saying the same things about bush/cheney/and the patriot act. where the fuck was your yellow bellied ass then?
 
30d8nro.jpg

well lookee there, cyprissy knows how to photoshop.
 
Protest is one thing, taking up arms against your duely elected government is quite another.

John Locke said it best:

"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience."
 
dumbass, some of us were saying the same things about bush/cheney/and the patriot act. where the fuck was your yellow bellied ass then?

I never once ever suggested taking up arms against our unduely elected president back in 2002, or our duely elected president after 2006. I dont remember any liberals doing so... maybe I have selevtive memory, but I dont think it happened, if it did not to the extent they are doing in this thread.
 
You're totally right....there's not a god damned teabagger on this thread that is ever going to shoot an american soldier or cop. I'm through with violent, and imaginary rightwing fantasies for today. Carry on with the faux revolution crapola!
when you get over the total craptastic shock of it actually happening, lets hook up and you can pay me.
 
I never once ever suggested taking up arms against our unduely elected president back in 2002, or our duely elected president after 2006. I dont remember any liberals doing so... maybe I have selevtive memory, but I dont think it happened, if it did not to the extent they are doing in this thread.

then you just decided you'd lay down and take it like a sheep? did you rant and rave and protest the unconstitutionality of the patriot act?
 
When arms were taken up against our then government:

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army" - Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island
 
Reservists will be sent to places of revolt where they have no roots, California based reservists will be sent to southern states and vice versa. The lesson learned from Tian'anmen Square, the Chinese used troops not from the Beijing area to put down the unrest. Active duty troops from the Rangers and Recon will be used because they are very adept at taking orders. Break down in the military ranks may not come fast enough. The problem is, those of you with your guns think that with enough of you you can win. The US defeated an army with tanks, missles, artillery etc. The home grown resister is not going to be that hard to defeat. It's why I say you have to have support in huge numbers, much greater than 30%, or the revolt will fail.

There are a growing number of organized active duty military, reservist's, vetras, active duty police, fire and retired men and women who will not take up arms against fellow American's who rebel against government to side with the Constitution.

www.oathkeepers.org
 
I'm making money off this pole of shit bill. Oh and laughing at the GED warriors posing like healthcare unibombers.
 
then you just decided you'd lay down and take it like a sheep? did you rant and rave and protest the unconstitutionality of the patriot act?

I did, but never did I decide that it was such an egrious issue that I should or would promote violent methods to change the situation, I simply promoted my canidates and voted to change things.

My revolution, America's revolution took place at the polls.
 
When arms were taken up against our then government:

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army" - Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island

The real and signifigant difference here is that the American people had not elected King George to lead the government.
 
The real and signifigant difference here is that the American people had not elected King George to lead the government.

A king asserts his will over the people...in the same way the dem congress and Obama are now doing with regrads to health care. There is no difference. American colonialist's rebelled and took up arms against her government.
 
A king asserts his will over the people...in the same way the dem congress and Obama are now doing with regrads to health care. There is no difference. American colonialist's rebelled and took up arms against her government.

President Obama and the Congress were ELECTED by the People, and if they dont like the job getting done, they have an oppertunity to get rid of them come next November.
 
President Obama and the Congress were ELECTED by the People, and if they dont like the job getting done, they have an oppertunity to get rid of them come next November.

And I am sure they will~~~

But this was a thread questioning the right of taking up arms against tyranny. Our Constitution recognised enemies both foreign and domestic. The Founder's knew first hand that governments can become corrupted to the point of needing to be fought beyond the ballot box. Your thread insinuated that those that come to that conclusion are wrong-headed becaue the government should never be so challenged. My point was to show how ridiculous and wrong-headed that is.
 
And I am sure they will~~~

But this was a thread questioning the right of taking up arms against tyranny. Our Constitution recognised enemies both foreign and domestic. The Founder's knew first hand that governments can become corrupted to the point of needing to be fought beyond the ballot box. Your thread insinuated that those that come to that conclusion are wrong-headed becaue the government should never be so challenged. My point was to show how ridiculous and wrong-headed that is.

Is whats going on now rising to the level of Tyranny?
 
Back
Top