DeSantis’ office hits back after class action suit from migrants, reveals 'consent fo

So I should have known that Trump supporters are inherently violent people who will try to pull off a coup in order to install a dictator?

In other words, "semi-fascists"?

Didn't you just lose your shit last week when Biden called you one?

FFS, get a grip.
No you should know there would be FBI investigators like Ray Epps trying to incite the crowd.
 
No you should know there would be FBI investigators like Ray Epps trying to incite the crowd.

The only one trying to incite the crowd was Trump.

And he incited them over a lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

A lie you told on here for two straight months.

But then when the time came for you to put your money where your big, fat mouth is, you pussied out like a chump and hid out here and shitposted all day.

You didn't save the Republic, you didn't even try and the reason is because you don't actually believe the 2020 election was really stolen, you're just saying it was to stir up shit to give your empty life meaning or to make friends with Nazis because no one else wants to be your friend.
 
I wonder...

Who has the stronger legal hand? Those taking the word of the illegals they were scammed, or state governors who have written contractual consent?

quote-a-verbal-contract-isn-t-worth-the-paper-it-s-written-on-samuel-goldwyn-11-26-38.jpg


I think that guy was on to something...
Consent based on lies, is not legal consent.
 
That wouldn't fly in a even Judge Judy's courtroom. Written contracts are all that count. All the verbal promises in the world mean nothing compared to a written contract. Try that shit you posted after buying a crappy used car from a sales lot...
Wrong, if the car salesman sells you a car, but it’s not the car you were told it was, the contract is null and void.
 
Wrong, if the car salesman sells you a car, but it’s not the car you were told it was, the contract is null and void.

Exactly. Got to love how the MAGATs twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend the indefensible, isn't it? They could qualify to be performers at Cirque du Soleil. lol
 
I wonder what MV will do with all those signs, now that they're no longer usable...
 
Consent based on lies, is not legal consent.

Prove they were "lies" or, even actually stated to them. What's on paper counts. What people claim is utterly the weakest thing you can present.

Plantiff: I was promised x, y, and z! They didn't give me that stuff!
Judge: Did you sign this contract I'm holding? Did you read it?
Plantiff: Well, I did sign it, but I didn't read it...
Judge: Case dismissed, you have nothing coming.
 
Prove they were "lies" or, even actually stated to them. What's on paper counts.

Not necessarily...if these people were told lies in order to get them to sign a contract, that contract becomes null and void.


Plantiff: I was promised x, y, and z! They didn't give me that stuff!
Judge: Did you sign this contract I'm holding? Did you read it?
Plantiff: Well, I did sign it, but I didn't read it...
Judge: Case dismissed, you have nothing coming.

Didn't read it because it wasn't translated, and the people signed those forms under duress and false promises.

Plaintiff: I was promised x,y,z! They didn't give me that stuff!
Judge: Did you sign this contract?
Plaintiff: Yes, under duress and under false pretenses
Judge: (To defendant) Did you tell these people you were taking them to Boston, but then took them to MV?
Defendant: Yes.
Judge: Then the contract is null and void and you are now admitting to kidnapping.
 
Not necessarily...if these people were told lies in order to get them to sign a contract, that contract becomes null and void.




Didn't read it because it wasn't translated, and the people signed those forms under duress and false promises.

Proof of your claim?
 
Not necessarily...if these people were told lies in order to get them to sign a contract, that contract becomes null and void.




Didn't read it because it wasn't translated, and the people signed those forms under duress and false promises.

Plaintiff: I was promised x,y,z! They didn't give me that stuff!
Judge: Did you sign this contract?
Plaintiff: Yes, under duress and under false pretenses
Judge: (To defendant) Did you tell these people you were taking them to Boston, but then took them to MV?
Defendant: Yes.
Judge: Then the contract is null and void and you are now admitting to kidnapping.

And if the defendant says, it was in the contract to take them to Martha's Vineyard on say, page 2 paragraph 3...?

Then the plaintiff's claims are null and void.
 
Back
Top