Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison

[artichoke]

It's amazing the way the RW websites change facts or forget to include them.

Jaleel Stallings was charged with lesser crimes than Derick Chauvin and I don't recall you complaining that Chauvin was out on bail.

Was Derrick Chauvin a flight risk or a domestic terrorist? No. Not what we're talking about here, obviously. Try to keep up.

And allow me to remind you who butchers the facts here:

-the "Trump cleared out a protest to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

 

[Concart]

You are the only one bringing up the judge. I have zero concern for the judge.

Who granted bail?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It's not, dumb-ass. No one's arguing that. Whatever the judge set the bail at, if they even allowed bail for domestic terrorists (which should never happen for obvious reasons), Democrat officials helped pay that bail to get domestic terrorists back on the streets violating more people's rights.

Comprehend it yet? Or are you going to stomp off and put me on ignore again?

Still waiting to be "made a fool of."

I sure would hate to see an example of Republicans paying to get a double murderer back on the street by helping pay his bail. I wonder what you would say about that?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...donate-kyle-rittenhouse-defense-fund-n1264343

 

[artichoke]

Who granted bail?

1) Again with the phony stomping off teenage drama queen routine. This is why no one takes you seriously when you storm off in one of your little Midol moment huffs.

2) The judge...the person no one here is talking about...the people who PAID THE BAIL MONEY is who we're talking about, knuckle-dragging imbecile.

Jesus Fucking Christ. Comprehend it.

 

[Concart]

I sure would hate to see an example of Republicans paying to get a double murderer back on the street by helping pay his bail. I wonder what you would say about that?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...donate-kyle-rittenhouse-defense-fund-n1264343

Excellent job pointing out the hypocrisy. It is the responsibility of the justice system to determine whether a person should be freed on bail. Since that person is presumed innocent, the idea that there is something wrong with ensuring they can afford bail is laughable. They are not domestic terrorists, or arsonists, or murderers until they have been tried. If the judge feels they are a risk to society or a risk to flee, they JUDGE denies bail. This isn't a debate. It's a five year old child throwing a temper tantrum. That's why he goes back on ignore. He's completely worthless.

 

[Micawber]

shut up you!

 

[Concart]

1) Again with the phony stomping off teenage drama queen routine. This is why no one takes you seriously when you storm off in one of your little Midol moment huffs.

2) The judge...the person no one here is talking about...the people who PAID THE BAIL MONEY is who we're talking about, knuckle-dragging imbecile.

Jesus Fucking Christ. Comprehend it.

They can't pay for bail that a judge denied, now can they? Seriously, you are a simpleton. Off you go.

 

[AProudLefty]

Why does it matter who gave the bail money?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Was Derrick Chauvin a flight risk or a domestic terrorist? No. Not what we're talking about here, obviously. Try to keep up.

Derrick Chauvin was charged with more serious crimes than Jaleel Stallings. Did Jaleel Stallings flee? Hmm.. Nope, he didn't, so I guess he wasn't really a flight risk as you seem to claim.

 

[Concart]

Derrick Chauvin was charged with more serious crimes than Jaleel Stallings. Did Jaleel Stallings flee? Hmm.. Nope, he didn't, so I guess he wasn't really a flight risk as you seem to claim.

The judge decides that. The judge decides that. The judge decides that. The judge decides that. I'm wondering if repeating it four times will penetrate the concrete that passes as his brain. I doubt it.

 

[Concart]

Why does it matter who gave the bail money?

Bingo. Our constitution enshrines the prohibition on excessive bail. That means it should be affordable, and this organization ensures that is the case. Why do Trumptards despise the legal system and the Constitution?

 

[artichoke]

shut up you!

Clever and devastating comeback...if we were in 3rd Grade. Go lay down and eat your crayons, Neanderthal.

 

[artichoke]

They can't pay for bail that a judge denied, now can they? Seriously, you are a simpleton. Off you go.

Who cares? That's not what anyone is talking about, fucking idiot.

Being ABLE to fund terrorists...is NOT what we're talking about.

CHOOSING to fund terrorists...IS what we're talking about.

None of which has one iota to do with the judge. That's as Barney-style as I can make it. Still can't comprehend it?

 

[artichoke]

Derrick Chauvin was charged with more serious crimes than Jaleel Stallings. Did Jaleel Stallings flee? Hmm.. Nope, he didn't, so I guess he wasn't really a flight risk as you seem to claim.

The only way someone can be a flight risk is if they were allowed to try, and then did in fact try?

Nice logic, as always there, Socrates.

 

[artichoke]

The judge decides that. The judge decides that. The judge decides that. The judge decides that. I'm wondering if repeating it four times will penetrate the concrete that passes as his brain. I doubt it.

And the ABILITY to fund domestic terrorists (what the judge decides, and what no one is talking about) is irrelevant to Democrats CHOOSING to fund domestic terrorists.

 

[artichoke]

Bingo. Our constitution enshrines the prohibition on excessive bail.

And a million-dollar bail isn't excessive if you're a domestic terrorist or flight risk, hence your entire moronic point here (that you have to be anti-Constitution to favor extreme bail) is invalid.

Fucking DUH.

 

[AProudLefty]

Funding domestic terrorists? How?

 

[Concart]

Funding domestic terrorists? How?

He read that somewhere. It's just galactically stupid. He wants to circumvent the criminal justice system, impose the will of his Dear Leader, and deny everyone who disagrees with him their constitutional rights. In other words, Arminus is a good little Nazi.

 

[artichoke]

He read that somewhere. It's just galactically stupid. He wants to circumvent the criminal justice system, impose the will of his Dear Leader, and deny everyone who disagrees with him their constitutional rights. In other words, Arminus is a good little Nazi.

I directly quoted Kamala Harris' exact words in her Tweet advocating for funding terrorists. But sure, I "read it somewhere."

Do you EVER stop lying and taking an eternity to grasp straightforward concepts?

Still waiting for you to "make a fool" of anyone but yourself.

 

[artichoke]

Alright. I've corrected enough of Concart's ignorance, lying, and garbage logic for today. I am now taking off.

Hint: This is what ACTUALLY leaving looks like, as opposed to Concart's phony teenage girl drama queen storm-offs for attention.