Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison

So, then you think the Constitution is bullshit. Got it.

Thanks for playing.

Thinking bail should be set very high or even denied to domestic terrorist...indicates one thinks the Constitution is bullshit? :rofl2:

That's an absolutely mainstream, standard position. People are denied bail or have their bails set incredibly high all the time, for being a flight risk, posing a risk to the community (like a DOMESTIC FUCKING TERRORIST does).

200.gif


Time to break it down in simple terms. If you want to keep someone in jail, you don't grant bail. If bail is granted it should be affordable.

If you have a problem with my statement, let's hear it. Be specific. Use your words.

See above. Just explained it. Bail is ROUTINELY set unreasonably high for flight risks and threats to the community, embarrassing ignoramus.

Next. :cool:

Okay, let's put this stupid fucking 'Kamala Harris raised bail money' bullshit to rest. Harris encouraged donations to an organization called the Minnesota Freedom fund. She did not donate, she did not provide bail money to anyone. She simply encouraged people to donate to the non-profit. OH THE FUCKING HORROR.

Direct quote: "If you're able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting [rioting] on the ground in Minnesota."

This is NOT her advocating for funding some generic organization...it's a clear, direct attempt to raise money for violent terrorists arrested in the middle of committing major felonies.

200.webp


What was that about "making a fool" of me? :rofl2:

Seems you've only made a fool of yourself. :laugh:

<crickets>

Not a single taker.

Maybe people don't respond to your posts because they don't hold any logical weight. :awesome:
 
Last edited:
Can you name the domestic terrorists you think are actually out on bail? I need specific names so I can do the research of the charging documents to find out if they are indeed charged with terrorism.

If you wish to retract your statement and admit you are full of shit, I will also accept that as a response from you.
 


Thinking bail should be set very high or even denied to domestic terrorist...indicates one thinks the Constitution is bullshit? :rofl2:

That's an absolutely mainstream, standard position. People are denied bail or have their bails set incredibly high all the time, for being a flight risk, posing a risk to the community (like a DOMESTIC FUCKING TERRORIST does).

200.gif




See above. Just explained it. Bail is ROUTINELY set unreasonably high for flight risks and threats to the community, embarrassing ignoramus.

:cool: Next.



Direct quote: "If you're able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting [rioting] on the ground in Minnesota."

This is NOT her advocating for funding some generic organization...it's clear, direct, terror-sponsoring.

200.webp


What was that about "making a fool" of me? :rofl2:

Seems you've only made a fool of yourself. :laugh:



Even taking that at face value, advocating for raising bail money for domestic terrorists...is only 99% treasonous, rather than 100% treasonous.

You got me. I stand corrected. :rofl2:

Maybe people don't respond to your posts because they don't hold any logical weight. :awesome:

So, you are okay with unreasonable bail. Why do you hate the Constitution so much, traitor?
 
Can you name the domestic terrorists you think are actually out on bail? I need specific names so I can do the research of the charging documents to find out if they are indeed charged with terrorism.

If you wish to retract your statement and admit you are full of shit, I will also accept that as a response from you.

Here's the real question? Why is it the fault of the Minnesota Freedom Fund and Kamala Harris that a JUDGE granted bail? Still no answer on that one.
 
Can you name the domestic terrorists you think are actually out on bail? I need specific names so I can do the research of the charging documents to find out if they are indeed charged with terrorism.

If you wish to retract your statement and admit you are full of shit, I will also accept that as a response from you.

1) I can tell you they aren't charged with terrorism because terrorism isn't a chargeable crime. The charge would be arson, rioting, assault on a police officer, etc.

2) Here are six of the domestic terrorists the Vice Resident of the United States herself helped get out of jail so they could burn down more cities and violate more people's rights:

Davlin Devonte Gates (strangulation)
Donavan Dexter Boone (strangulation with multiple witnesses)
Matthew Owens Earl Thompson (breaking and entering)
Tyrone Thomas Shields (assault)
Reece Omaur Bonneville (assault)
Marcus Marshun Butler (assault)

Man twice bailed out by Kamala Harris-backed fund — gets arrested again

Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did

Next. :cool:
 


1) I can tell you they aren't charged with terrorism because terrorism isn't a chargeable crime. The charge would be arson, rioting, assault on a police officer, etc.

2) Here are six of the domestic terrorists the Vice Resident of the United States herself helped get out of jail so they could burn down more cities and violate more people's rights:

Davlin Devonte Gates (strangulation)
Donavan Dexter Boone (strangulation with multiple witnesses)
Matthew Owens Earl Thompson (breaking and entering)
Tyrone Thomas Shields (assault)
Reece Omaur Bonneville (assault)
Marcus Marshun Butler (assault)

Man twice bailed out by Kamala Harris-backed fund — gets arrested again

Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did

Next. :cool:

Why did a judge grant bail?

Next?
 
Here's the real question? Why is it the fault of the Minnesota Freedom Fund and Kamala Harris that a JUDGE granted bail? Still no answer on that one.

It's not, dumb-ass. No one's arguing that. Whatever the judge set the bail at, if they even allowed bail for domestic terrorists (which should never happen for obvious reasons), Democrat officials helped pay that bail to get domestic terrorists back on the streets violating more people's rights.

Comprehend it yet? Or are you going to stomp off and put me on ignore again? :awesome:

Still waiting to be "made a fool of." :rofl2:
 
Arminus said:
Thinking bail should be set very high or even denied to domestic terrorist...indicates one thinks the Constitution is bullshit?

Denying bail no. Setting unreasonable bail, yes.

Maybe because the FUCKING CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT DUMB FUCK.
 
Yes they should. DUH. If bail is granted, it should be reasonable. Agree or disagree?

Do I need to break out the crayons? Try comprehending it so we don't have to go through this a fourth time. Obviously, if the person is a flight risk or a domestic terrorist, you don't give them bail, or you set it so incredibly high that it will financially destroy them to screw it up.

Again, obviously. A normal, adult level debater would have comprehended this about twelve posts ago. :palm:

Grasp it yet? :awesome:
 
Denying bail no. Setting unreasonable bail, yes.

Maybe because the FUCKING CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT DUMB FUCK.

Show us where it says you have to make bail easy for domestic terrorists and flight risks to take advantage of, imbecile. We'll wait.

:laugh:
 
If a judge does not grant bail, then no one can raise bail money for them. Is that really hard for you? Should I post a picture?

Raise money...for a DOMESTIC FUCKING TERRORIST? Obviously, yes, that's hard for all the sane people to justify. :laugh:
 
Back
Top