Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison

33WuvrC.gif
 
"I directly quoted Kamala Harris' exact words in her Tweet advocating for funding terrorists."

:rofl2: Sure. Sure.
 
"If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota."

This has become 'I am going to bail out murderers, arsonists, rapists, and terrorists'

You can't make this shit up. Talk about poor widdle sensitive snowflakes.
 
Arminius said:


The only way someone can be a flight risk is if they were allowed to try, and then did in fact try? :laugh:

Nice logic, as always there, Socrates. :hand:
Click to expand...

You realize you just destroyed your own argument, right? If as you claim there is no way to know if someone will be a flight risk until they are released then a court can never take that into account when setting bail because the courts rely on facts and not speculation. The fact of the matter is Jaleel Stallings bail was set according to state guidelines. Just as Derrick Chauvin's bail was set according to state guidelines. Your argument has no legal basis and no factual basis as you continue to claim that someone is a domestic terrorist without any evidence in support of that claim.

It's an interesting case because the police fired at Stallings first because they thought he was bending over to pick up a rock to throw at them according to the evidence presented to the court.
 
Concart said:
"If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota."

This has become 'I am going to bail out murderers, arsonists, rapists, and terrorists'

You can't make this shit up. Talk about poor widdle sensitive snowflakes.
Click to expand...

Do people get arrested for protesting? Or do Democrats just lie about violent riots being peaceful protests? Because the violent crimes these people are charged with don't indicate peaceful protesting, which would mean...brace yourself...Kamala Harris just intentionally misrepresented the rioters she was supporting as "protesters" to make it seem okay.

And now we have to field idiot outrage by unthinking lemmings like you parroting dishonest scumbags who intentionally legitimize lynch mob violence and domestic terrorism.

content bs.jpg

As usual, way to think it through, brainiac. :laugh:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You realize you just destroyed your own argument, right?
Click to expand...

Um...no. Showing the idiocy of you pretending that one can only be identified as a flight risk once it is too late...in no way impacts the arguments being made by the adult-level IQ debaters here.

:nono:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
If as you claim there is no way to know if someone will be a flight risk until they are released...
Click to expand...

That's never what I claimed. You just struggle with reading comprehension. :palm:

Judges base flight risk calculations on means (money), how famous the person is (can they easily disappear), and other similar factors, all of which can be determined without waiting to see if they run first, which only a complete moron would ever suggest in the first place.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
...then a court can never take that into account...
Click to expand...

Just stop. We aren't even talking about what the judge decides to make possible. We're talking about Democrats DECIDING to fund the bail, which is wholly irrelevant to the judge deciding whether bail CAN be obtained, and at what level.

Try to keep up. :cool:
 
Concart said:
No, YOU don't. You fucking morons pretend that the Constitution is your Holy Grail, and you don't even know what the fuck is in it. You are stupid and lazy. You insult the intelligence of every poster who actually wants a serious discussion. if you don't why the Constitution is relevant here, then you should just stop posting. What a fucking idiot. Read the Constitution and get back to me, okay, hammerhead?
Click to expand...

where in the constitution does it say the VP should raise money to bail terrorists out of jail after they commit assault and arson?....
 
Concart said:
So you can't answer a simple question. What is wrong with an organization that has as its sole mission to ensure that bail is affordable? Why is that wrong. A judge decided the person should be granted bail. Do you think unaffordable bail is okay? If your issue is with the GRANTING OF BAIL, then what does Kamala Harris have to do with that?
Click to expand...

it is wrong when a VP and her staff support paying bail for arsonists and worse.......
 
Concart said:
Wow. Just fucking wow.

You fucking ignorant hillbilly.

'Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.'

Which fucking word are you having trouble with?
Click to expand...

I have trouble with you thinking that just because a person who sets fire to a building in Minneapolis hasn't ever held a job, its a good idea for the VP to raise the money to put him back on the street to set more fires in buildings in Minneapolis........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top