COVID-19 Map

Find that quote, ignorant liar.

Are the big words confusing you, DEMOCRAT?

Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there’s actual testing to confirm that’s the case.

Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.


Loser.

:rofl2:
 
Are the big words confusing you, DEMOCRAT?

Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there’s actual testing to confirm that’s the case.

Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.


Loser.

:rofl2:

:lolup:

Another failure to produce, flaccid little liar. That’s always the case with you.

“Everyone who dies”. :rofl2:

Illiterate clown
 
“Everyone who dies”.

The CDC has told physicians and medical examiners to "assume" that everyone who dies has COVID-19.

That's right, DEMOCRAT. Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there’s actual testing to confirm that’s the case.

Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.


https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/...w-ICD-code-introduced-for-COVID-19-deaths.pdf

Loser.

:rolf2:
 
A myth.

With every debate on taxing and spending in Washington comes inevitable references to which states send more in taxes to the federal treasury than they receive in benefits for their citizens. The figures thrown around are sourced differently and vary widely, but the point of it all is for dissembling DEMOCRATS to point at poor, Republican states and call them hypocrites for doing exactly what DEMOCRATS say they should: taking money from richer places.

But how much of it is true?

What is surprising is that disingenuous DEMOCRATS act like the red states are getting away with something.

Progressive ideology has as one of its central tenets the idea that money should be transferred from the rich to the poor. In our progressive tax code, they have succeeded in enacting the first part of that equation. The only strange part is that they look askance at the poorer regions of the country for simply obeying the tax code.

How much the federal government takes in taxes is simple. How much they pay out gets more complicated.

The results are somewhat at odds with the claims on the Left that the red states are takers while the blue states are makers.

Of the ten states with the lowest percentage of funds coming from Washington, three are red, six are blue, and one is purple. The state with by far the lowest level of federal subsidization was the deeply red state of North Dakota.

If, instead of comparing federal funds to state budgets, we look at how much the federal government spends in intergovernmental grants per resident of a state, the results are turned on their heads.

Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmental spending per American, red states receive just $1,879.

Blue states get considerably more, at $2,124 per resident.

Purple states see the least of their money returned to them per capita, at just $1,770.

Measured in this way, the blue states are getting quite a bit more than the red or purple.

sammin11.16.4.jpg



https://thefederalist.com/2017/11/17/red-states-tax-takers-blue-states-tax-makers/

Article is bogus, shocking coming out of the "Federalist," one of several regurgitated everytime a Trumpkin looks to invalidate the fact that Blue States, Donor States, pay more while most Red States (the Receivers) get more, one subsidies the other

https://www.governing.com/week-in-finance/gov-taxpayers-10-states-give-more-feds-than-get-back.html
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700/
https://www.money-rates.com/research-center/federal-income-taxes-by-state.htm
https://www.businessinsider.com/federal-taxes-federal-services-difference-by-state-2019-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tax_revenue_by_state
https://www.theatlantic.com/busines...tates-are-givers-and-which-are-takers/361668/
https://www.voanews.com/usa/all-about-america/which-us-states-get-more-they-give
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...tes-depend-the-most-on-the-federal-government
 
Facts are facts no matter how many corny copy and pastes you forward

Can you prove anything in this post is wrong?



A myth.

With every debate on taxing and spending in Washington comes inevitable references to which states send more in taxes to the federal treasury than they receive in benefits for their citizens. The figures thrown around are sourced differently and vary widely, but the point of it all is for dissembling DEMOCRATS to point at poor, Republican states and call them hypocrites for doing exactly what DEMOCRATS say they should: taking money from richer places.

But how much of it is true?

What is surprising is that disingenuous DEMOCRATS act like the red states are getting away with something.

Progressive ideology has as one of its central tenets the idea that money should be transferred from the rich to the poor. In our progressive tax code, they have succeeded in enacting the first part of that equation. The only strange part is that they look askance at the poorer regions of the country for simply obeying the tax code.

How much the federal government takes in taxes is simple. How much they pay out gets more complicated.

The results are somewhat at odds with the claims on the Left that the red states are takers while the blue states are makers.

Of the ten states with the lowest percentage of funds coming from Washington, three are red, six are blue, and one is purple. The state with by far the lowest level of federal subsidization was the deeply red state of North Dakota.

If, instead of comparing federal funds to state budgets, we look at how much the federal government spends in intergovernmental grants per resident of a state, the results are turned on their heads.

Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmental spending per American, red states receive just $1,879.

Blue states get considerably more, at $2,124 per resident.

Purple states see the least of their money returned to them per capita, at just $1,770.

Measured in this way, the blue states are getting quite a bit more than the red or purple.

sammin11.16.4.jpg



https://thefederalist.com/2017/11/17/red-states-tax-takers-blue-states-tax-makers/
 
Can you prove anything in this post is wrong?

Already did, I gave you eight largely nonpartisan sources, and there are literally scores of others, that negated the "Federalists" postion, and the fact they have to get into "per capita" averages of "intergovernmental grants" it is a dead giveaway how far they are reaching to frame their opinon
 
Already did

No, you didn't.

I didn't think you could prove your claim, and it looks as though I was correct.

Instead of comparing federal funds to state budgets, we look at how much the federal government spends in intergovernmental grants per resident of a state, the results are turned on their heads.

Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmental spending per American, red states receive just $1,879.

Blue states get considerably more, at $2,124 per resident.

Purple states see the least of their money returned to them per capita, at just $1,770.

Measured in this way, the blue states are getting quite a bit more than the red or purple.


sammin11.16.4.jpg


https://thefederalist.com/2017/11/17/red-states-tax-takers-blue-states-tax-makers/
 
Back
Top