Confirmation Hearing live: Judge Amy Barrett

Barrret is a scumbag. She will be forever hated by most Americans.

I knew her. I sent an anonymous letter to Feinstein stating she was a big slut in h.s., smoked pot, and used a cheat sheet on a geography test in the11th grade.
I'm prepared to testify this under oath in front of the judiciary committee.
 
She's ALSO LYING.

There is no way, that Donald Trump has not discussed in his private White House meeting with Barret, that he did not discuss his expecting loyalty in return for her nomination, regarding the overturning of the ACA and his intentions to file LAW SUITS to the SUpreme court in challenging states ballots if he does not win.

SHe was asked by Leahe if there were any discussions regarding those matters- and she said no!

WELL, WE ALL KNOW THAT DONALD TRUMP CANNOT REFRAIN FROM SUCH DEMANDS, AND HE HAS NEVER SHOWN ANY RESTRAINT FOR DEMANDING SUCH LOYALTY- AS WITNESSED BY EVERYONE HE NOMINATES FOR ANY POSITION. DONALD TRUMP ASKING FOR LOYALTY IS DONALD TRUMP'S GOLDEN STANDARD- AND WE ALL KNOW IT!

Donald Trump is on public record stating that he always demands loyalty from anyone he appoints to any position. And every ex-cabinet member has revealed this in books and public statements.

SHe could have told the truth and said, "The President may, or may not have asked for my loyalty, but I did not agree to give it to him". BUT SHE DID NOT TELL THE TRUTH!

SHE LIED!

Disagreed. You're claiming guilt by association.

Yes, Trump is a complete fucking moron and would try to talk about what he wants to judges.

No, Barrett would not allow that to happen and, like we are seeing in the confirmation hearing, would tell anyone, including Trump, "I can't talk about that".

Lastly, like all judges, Barrett has her personal beliefs be it about adopting Haitian children or abortion and then she has her professional responsibilities and duty to her oath. All judges face this problem. If you believe RBG or anyone else was different, you are wrong.
 
Shes brilliant, going to be a great justice.

Agreed. Don't be surprised if she ends up pissing off Trump once she's on the bench. LOL

Judge Amy Coney Barrett will go with the law, not what some delusional fucking moron wants.
 
Trump said he would appont a judge who would help him in an election case, vote to kill the ACA and overturn Roe. Then he interviewed a bunch of candidates and settled on her. Do you really think he forgot to mention those things? Her job has been predetermined. She will lie to cover that up and we are supposed to belive she is Christian. If she really was, she would tell the truth.
 
Thanks for the detailed response, admission of Democrat power grabs and Democrat Pie-in-the-Sky, but I'll bet you $1000 right now that there's NO FUCKING WAY the Democrats will install a Term Limits bill. :)

Agreed the Republicans are seeking a power grab, but that's not news. Both sides becoming more extreme and seeking to impose their will upon all Americans is a problem that has increased in severity over the past 30 years.

Well, the Democrats have always seemed to be the sleeping Giant. The Democrats have always seemed to allow the Republicans to Power-Play them when push comes to shove. Allowing Mitch McConnel to disallow Obama to appoint a Justice to the Supreme Court during the beginning of an election year- IS MY BEST EXAMPLE FOR ME, THAT WAS THE FINAL straw. Fuck morality- WHEN THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT USE IT. Fuck the truth, when the other side does not use it. Fuck ethics- WHEN THE OTHER side does not use it. Politics has evolved into a Blood Sport- YOU WANT BLOOD- YOU GOT IT!

If you need any more examples- I HAVE TONS OF THEM.

But anyway, I believe that the Democrats have learned that- YOU DO NOT GO INTO A KNIFE FIGHT WITHOUT A KNIFE.

I also believe that is is time to give the REPUBLICANS a taste of their own medicine!

AND I BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE LEARNED THAT GETTING YOUR VOTE OUT- IS ESSENTIAL IF YOU WANT POWER.

AND I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE LEARNED- THAT IF GAMES ARE TO BE PLAYED- TWO CAN PLAY THESE VERY SAME GAMES THE REPUBLICANS HAVE PLAYED IN THE PAST TO OBTAIN POWER.

DONALD TRUMP AND MITCH McCONNELL HAVE SET PRECEDENTS THAT WILL HAVE LONG AND LASTING EFFECTS FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.

AND PAYBACK IS A MOTHER_FUCKER!
 
Last edited:
Well, the Democrats have always seemed to be the sleeping Giant. The Democrats have always seemed to allow the Republicans to Power-Play them when push comes to shove. Allowing Mitch McConnel to disallow Obama to appoint a Justice to the Supreme Court during the beginning of an election year- IS MY BEST EXAMPLE FOR ME, THAT WAS THE FINAL straw. Fuck morality- WHEN THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT USE IT. Fuck the truth, when the other side does not use it. Fuck ethics- WHEN THE OTHER side does not use it. Politics has evolved into a Blood Sport- YOU WANT BLOOD- YOU GOT IT!

If you need any more examples- I HAVE TONS OF THEM.

But anyway, I believe that the Democrats have learned that- YOU DO NOT GO INTO A KNIFE FIGHT WITHOUT A KNIFE.

I also believe that is is time to give the REPUBLICANS a taste of their own medicine!

AND I BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE LEARNED THAT GETTING YOUR VOTE OUT- IS ESSENTIAL IF YOU WANT POWER.

AND I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE LEARNED- THAT IF GAMES ARE TO BE PLAYED- TWO CAN PLAY THESE VERY SAME GAMES THE REPUBLICANS HAVE PLAYED IN THE PAST TO OBTAIN POWER.

DONALD TRUMP AND MITCH McCONNELL HAVE SET PRECEDENTS THAT WILL HAVE LONG AND LASTING EFFECTS FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.

AND PAYBACK IS A MOTHER_FUCKER!

There is nothing the Dems can do, The reds have the votes.
 
Disagreed. You're claiming guilt by association.

Yes, Trump is a complete fucking moron and would try to talk about what he wants to judges.

No, Barrett would not allow that to happen and, like we are seeing in the confirmation hearing, would tell anyone, including Trump, "I can't talk about that".

Lastly, like all judges, Barrett has her personal beliefs be it about adopting Haitian children or abortion and then she has her professional responsibilities and duty to her oath. All judges face this problem. If you believe RBG or anyone else was different, you are wrong.

There's literally no credible evidence, whatsoever, that she 'would not allow that to happen'.
 
There's literally no credible evidence, whatsoever, that she 'would not allow that to happen'.

Would not allow what to happen? As demonstrated earlier, sometimes it's difficult to know what you are talking about.

Similarly, Senator Whitehouse (D-RI) talked about puppet shows and now he's giving one with charts. LOL
 
Graham is an idiot, another Senator who needs to retire if he isn’t retired by Jamie Harrison. I think most of the Republican Senators are past their due dates.

Among the top 10 senior Senators, there's a 5-5 tie between Republicans and Democrats. Should those 5 Democrats go, too?

I eat urinal cakes for snacks.
 
Trump said he would appont a judge who would help him in an election case, vote to kill the ACA and overturn Roe. Then he interviewed a bunch of candidates and settled on her. Do you really think he forgot to mention those things? Her job has been predetermined. She will lie to cover that up and we are supposed to belive she is Christian. If she really was, she would tell the truth.

Quote where he said that.
 
Disagreed. You're claiming guilt by association.

Yes, Trump is a complete fucking moron and would try to talk about what he wants to judges.

No, Barrett would not allow that to happen and, like we are seeing in the confirmation hearing, would tell anyone, including Trump, "I can't talk about that".

Lastly, like all judges, Barrett has her personal beliefs be it about adopting Haitian children or abortion and then she has her professional responsibilities and duty to her oath. All judges face this problem. If you believe RBG or anyone else was different, you are wrong.

The entire 4 years of TRUMP's CULT is all about "GUILT BY ASSOCIATION".

To think that Barret is not a part of that cult- would be too hard a challenge for my common sense.

The woman thinks that DEMOCRATS ARE KILLERS OD BABIES AND SHE IS GUARANTEED TO REVERSE ROE VS. WADE.

SO ROE VS. WADE IS HISTORY- KAPOOT.

And so is the ACA!

And any future legislation that a Democratic legislation passes from now on, THE REPUBLICANS WILL JUST SIMPLY FILE A LAWSUIT CLAIMING IT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND SHE WILL BE RIGHT THERE ON THE SUPREME COURT TO USE HER TEXTUALIST PERSONAL BELIEVES TO JUSTIFY HER VOTE TO LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH!

ALL OF HER HISTORY OF BEING A JUDGE- SHE HAS TAKEN THE MOST EXTREME RIGHT-WING POSITIONS ON HER VERDICTS- AND USED HER TEXTUALIST PERSONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE INTENT OF OUR FOREFATHERS IN THE WRITING OF THE CONSTITUTION.

BARRET IS A RIGHT-WING HACK!

AND YES, SHE DOES HAVE A POLITICAL DIED-IN-THE-WOOL AGENDA.

SHE IS ABOUT THE MOST UN A-POLITICAL NOMINEE EVER APPOINTED TO THE SUPREME COURT- AND OUR COUNTRY IS IN TROUBLE AS LONG AS SHE IS ON THE BENCH!

YOU JUST WATCH!
 
Last edited:
The entire 4 years of TRUMP's CULT is all about "GUILT BY ASSOCIATION".

To think that Barret is not a part of that cult- would be too hard a challenge for my common sense.

The woman thinks that DEMOCRATS ARE KILLERS OD BABIES AND SHE IS GUARANTEED TO REVERSE ROE VS. WADE.

SO ROE VS. WADE IS HISTORY- KAPOOT.

And so is the ACA!

And any future legislation that a Democratic legislation passes from now on, THE RPUBLICANS WILL JUST SIMPLY FILE A LAWSUIT CLAIMING IT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND SHE WILL BE RIGHT THERE ON THE SUPREME COURT TO USE HER TEXTULIST PERSONAL BELIEVES TO JUSTIFY HER VOTE TO LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH!

ALL OF HER HISTORY ON THE BENCH- SHE HAS TAKEN THE MOST EXTREME RIGHT-WING POSITIONS ON HER VERDICTS- AND USED HER TEXTULIST PERSONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE INTENT OF OUR FORFATHERS IN THE WRITING OF THE CONSTITUTION.

BARRET IS A RIGHT-WING HACK!

AND YES, SHE DOES HAVE A POLITICAL DIED_IN THE WOOL AGENDA.

SHE IS ABOUT THE MOST UN A-POLITICAL NOMINEE EVER APPOITED TO THE SUPREME COURT- AND OUR COUNTRY IS IN TROUBLE AS LONG AS SHE IS ON THE BENCH!

YOU JUST WATCH!

There's nothing right wing about following the Constitution. It's just right to do so.

What's funny is you can't do a damn thing about her being confirmed.
 
The entire 4 years of TRUMP's CULT is all about "GUILT BY ASSOCIATION".

To think that Barret is not a part of that cult- would be too hard a challenge for my common sense.

The woman thinks that DEMOCRATS ARE KILLERS OD BABIES AND SHE IS GUARANTEED TO REVERSE ROE VS. WADE.

SO ROE VS. WADE IS HISTORY- KAPOOT.

And so is the ACA!

And any future legislation that a Democratic legislation passes from now on, THE RPUBLICANS WILL JUST SIMPLY FILE A LAWSUIT CLAIMING IT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND SHE WILL BE RIGHT THERE ON THE SUPREME COURT TO USE HER TEXTULIST PERSONAL BELIEVES TO JUSTIFY HER VOTE TO LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH!

ALL OF HER HISTORY ON THE BENCH- SHE HAS TAKEN THE MOST EXTREME RIGHT-WING POSITIONS ON HER VERDICTS- AND USED HER TEXTULIST PERSONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE INTENT OF OUR FORFATHERS IN THE WRITING OF THE CONSTITUTION.

BARRET IS A RIGHT-WING HACK!

AND YES, SHE DOES HAVE A POLITICAL DIED_IN THE WOOL AGENDA.

SHE IS ABOUT THE MOST UN A-POLITICAL NOMINEE EVER APPOITED TO THE SUPREME COURT- AND OUR COUNTRY IS IN TROUBLE AS LONG AS SHE IS ON THE BENCH!

YOU JUST WATCH!

Holy fucking Gloom and Doom, Batman! We're all gonna die!!

What's going to happen with you when/if Trump wins?
 
I’m not watching, but I agree, Donald demands loyalty from everyone. Why would she be an exception.

She is nothing more than another TRUMP CULTIST.

IF SHE WAS AUTHENTIC- SHE WOULD HAVE TOLD DONALD TRUMP THAT SHE BELIEVES THAT VOTERS SHOULD DECIDE WHO THE NEXT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD BE!

THAT WOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT SHE TRULY HAD MORAL FIBER- WAS ETHICAL AND WANTED TO BE TRULY FAIR IN HER DECISIONS.

She is just another power-hungry RIGHT-WINGER LOOKING AFTER HER OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL INTERESTS!
 
Back
Top