christiefan915
Catalyst
I doubt it.
Tell me what you want to know and I'll quote it.
I doubt it.
Tell me what you want to know and I'll quote it.
You know it.
Are you best friends with Robert Mueller?
Mr. Comey: I am not. I admire the heck out of the man, but I don't know his phone number, I've never been to his house,
I don't know his children's names. I think I had a meal once alone with him in a restaurant. I like him. I am not a --
I'm an associate of his who admires him greatly. We're not friends in any social sense.
Mr. Nadler: Thank you. I will not ask whether you've ever hugged and kissed him.
Mr. Comey: A relief to my wife.
You mean you'll search for it.![]()
The dictionary disagrees with you.
Sorry, you don’t get to make your own definitionsThink outside the box: https://www.ft.com/content/a08b7420-1405-11e3-9289-00144feabdc0
I'll stick with my assertion and defend it.
But I won't go out shopping for a dictionary yet, even though I suspect I could find one.
Clearly I don't have every page committed to memory but I took some notes and page numbers.
So Comey is a homophobe.![]()
So I would suggest that Comey effectively smacked down Nadler! And probably got a laugh for his effort too! What a feeble comeback legion. You do a lot better when you stick to your profanity and spamming.
Sorry, you don’t get to make your own definitions
glad you got past that nonsense that gross negligence requires intent.The point you are missing is that Mueller and Comey are colluding in a totally legal way. Mueller is the FBI and Comey is an American citizen who retains huge amounts of information that can and will be used against Trump. Think it over and get back to me if you care enough.
Collusion is not always a bad word. Sometimes good and great people work in collusion to accomplish wonderful things!
glad you got past that nonsense that gross negligence requires intent.
The statute obviously does not. Further there was a submarine sailor who took pics of his sub for personal use
who WAS prosecuted but had no intent to do harm.
Trump had the good graces to pardon him even if there is a 2 tiered justice system by corrupt DoJ
and the corrupt reasons gave for not prosecuting HRClinton. but he still did federal time- 12 months in jail
Trump pardons sailor convicted of taking illegal photos aboard submarine
https://www.navytimes.com/news/pent...ed-of-taking-illegal-photos-aboard-submarine/
In court, Saucier acknowledged that he took six photos of his work station aboard an attack submarine in violation of Navy rules.
He said the reason was not to jeopardize sensitive information about the vessel, but instead to keep as a memento
of his time on board.
Trump’s pardon removes the felony conviction from Saucier’s record but will not make the former sailor automatically available for military and veteran benefits.
the whole thing was rank partisanship.Remember the laptop that the Capitol Police found that was left for them by Imran Awan. Awan got a sweetheart plea deal.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/fl-reg-imran-awan-plea-deal-20180703-story.html
the sailor did 12 months with n o intent to do harm .intent is a red herring.I think you've avoided addressing my point that Comey and Mueller are working together to bring down Trump. But I'll relent and back off on using the word, 'collusion' if that's your sticking point.
Intent plays a very big part of determining suitable punishment and it's likely that most cases where there was no criminal or malicious intent resulted in suspended sentences. But let's not lose the topic. Comey and Mueller are likely BFF! or you might just as well resign yourself to the equivalent of that for our intent and purposes.
the sailor did 12 months with n o intent to do harm .intent is a red herring.
just another reason that showed Comey was in the tank for Clinton.. I won't even go into texts etc.
You know it.
Are you best friends with Robert Mueller?
Mr. Comey: I am not. I admire the heck out of the man, but I don't know his phone number, I've never been to his house,
I don't know his children's names. I think I had a meal once alone with him in a restaurant. I like him. I am not a --
I'm an associate of his who admires him greatly. We're not friends in any social sense.
Mr. Nadler: Thank you. I will not ask whether you've ever hugged and kissed him.
Mr. Comey: A relief to my wife.
cool.then I won't take your arguments seriously if you can't defend "how Comey did it" ( bolded)What the hell do you think you're arguing? The sailor would likely be doing a life sentence for treason if intent was shown or proven!
As to Comey's own personal preferences which shouldn't have been a part of his professional thoughts and actions? They probably did! But proving it is a very different matter. But really anatta, aren't you attempting to rise to a much higher standard than is applicable to anything happening in your country now that has been influenced by Trump's behaviour? Isn't it far, far beyond reasonable and appropriate behaviour?
Who really cares how Comey did it if he's able to drive a wooden stake through Trump's evil heart?
YOu're not playing in my sandbox anatta. I'm not an American and I'm not a Dem supporter either. I'm a Trump hater, to put it concisely.
Sorry, you don’t get to make your own definitions
cool.then I won't take your arguments seriously if you can't defend "how Comey did it" ( bolded)
You are all over the place on your argument .
The point was intent is not necessary for conviction ( much less an indictment ) of 'gross negligence'
for the sailor, but was cited by Comey as a reason not to indict Clinton.
Your Trump Derangement Syndrome isn't unique - the entire Democrat party is so infected
but it's not a ready made excuse either for unequal justice under the law.
the problem is Comey and the 7th Floor asshats of DoJ leadership used all kinds of bogus reasons to start the FBI counter intelligence investigation. That begot the evil spawn of Mueller who is a political hack running a bunch of political hack lawyers out to crucify Trump. nothing more.Now you're getting it! I don't defend Comey and nobody else needs to because I contend that he's always going to come out the winner against Trump, in the eyes of the majority.
mixing politics and law for Machiavellian outcomes is something we do not tolerate.Clinton was an evil bitch and was the worst possible choice the Dems could have made. She was likely the only politician they could have chosen who wouldn't have beaten Trump. Mostly because of her appearance as a frumpy fat cow. That's what's most important in US politics. Comey's statement on the sailor comparison will live through the whole thing because it's being decided to be right on the political basis alone.
fair enough. putting your cards on the table is useful in reading your postsIf I can't convince you that I'm a Canadian and I abhor the Democrats as much as the Repubs, then we're going nowhere. Find something to debate with me if you like. I've already probably got a few hundred opinions stated on this board.