Comey lies 200 times

Darth Beto Omar said:
Comey said Hillary exercised extreme carelessness in handling classified information; because if he accused her of gross negligence he would’ve had to recommend an indictment.

For a man in his position to subvert the law in that manner calls into question his integrity. And before you go there with Trump, get back with us when Trump starts subverting the law.

Comey was being evasive to keep from lying or exposing the truth. He knows all he has to do is run the clock out till January.

Worry less about Trump’s Tweets or past mistresses and more about the culture of corruption that pervades our justice system.
Click to expand...

Do you think Colin Powell and Scott Pruitt 's private emails are ipso facto evidence for treason?

Do you honestly think Hillary Clinton is a traitor?

Do you really believe the Justice Department are corrupt?
 
kudzu said:
Do you think Colin Powell and Scott Pruitt 's private emails are ipso facto evidence for treason?

Do you honestly think Hillary Clinton is a traitor?

Do you really believe the Justice Department are corrupt?
Click to expand...

It’s impossible to commit treason because we aren’t at war with anyone.

Hillary is lucky to be unindicted. She can thank Comey for that. I think it’s astoundng that she keeps injecting herself into issues instead of going into hiding somewhere.

And, yes. Not from top to bottom but people have already been fired or demoted for extreme bias by the IG. That level of bias is a kind of corruption.
 
jimmymccready said:
noise does not understand the House does not get to investigate an ongoing FBI investigation.

Comey acted at the direction of the government lawyer provided to help him protect the investigation.

kudzu has easily refuted noise's arguments.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-judiciary-committee-releases-transcript-james-comey-testimony/

The 235-page hearing is linked here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H0l1z0v-pgY7OoPEaYDSAlL8AYfBb4lP/view
Click to expand...
no.
we're are not discussing the DoJ lawyr/lapdog there to deflect incoming..we are talking about
" I don't remember I don't recall"

 
kudzu said:
You have an inventory that proves those things were on her computer?
Click to expand...
classified info transversing her private server. the thumb drive in Kendalls safe

https://dailycaller.com/2015/09/01/new-clinton-violations-in-use-of-thumb-drives-for-emails/
Hillary Clinton violated numerous State Department rules by using privately owned thumb drives to copy 30,000 of her official emails for her lawyer, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

The former Secretary of State in December 2014 downloaded 30,000 government emails created during her tenure in the position from her private server onto three commercial thumb drives, which her lawyer, David Kendall, transported to Washington, D.C.

The State Department released 7,000 new Clinton emails Monday, including at least 125 that were treated by the department as classified. The FBI is conducting a criminal investigation into the handling of her emails, more than 400 of which have now been shown to include classified material.

In transferring her emails to private thumb drives, Clinton violated a slew of federal regulations, including those of her own State Department.

The State Department’s Foreign Affairs manual prohibits the storage of classified material on any external drive, stating, “the flash drive may only be used for the transfer of unclassified files.” Flash and thumb drives are treated inter-changeably by the rules.

Further, unclassified material must be on a “department owned” drive, not a personal or private sector drive.

If the information on the drive is unclassified, but still sensitive, it “must be encrypted to current standards” for transportation, according to the manual.

State Department rules also required that Clinton’s email transfer had to be approved and closely supervised by a department computer security official.

Finally, the National Institute for Standards and Technology, which sets minimum government-wide standards for IT security, ordered that thumb drive restrictions be imposed if the contents were “high value,” a lower standard than classified information.
 
There is no deep state, though there is a deep Trump plot against the civil liberties of Americans.

There is a House GOP committee plot to interfere with the Mueller investigation, and after they leave office they can be charged in federal courts for obstructing justice.
 
noise said:
Comey to House Committee: answered “I don’t remember” 71 times, “I don’t know” 166 times and “I don’t recall” eight times.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., published the 235-page transcript as a part of an agreement with Comey.

The former bureau boss frustrated GOP lawmakers during Friday’s session, in large part because his lawyers urged him not to answer numerous questions. Comey is expected to return later in the month for another round, though blasted Republicans on his way out for what he called a “desperate attempt to find anything that can be used to attack the institutions of justice investigating this president.”

But while Comey insisted in the interview that “we never investigated the Trump campaign for political purposes,” the transcript shows he claimed ignorance or memory lapses in response to questions concerning key details and events in the Russia investigation, which some GOP lawmakers continue to claim was improperly conducted.

The transcript reveals lawmakers’ frustration with his lack of specifics.

Asked if he recalled who drafted the FBI’s “initiation document” for the July 2016 Russia investigation, Comey said, “I do not.” He again claimed not to know when asked about the involvement in that initiation of Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump texts later got him removed from the special counsel’s probe.

When asked if the FBI had any evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired to hack the DNC server, Comey gave a lengthy answer referring to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation as to why he couldn’t answer.

“Did we have evidence in July of (2016) that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired to hack the DNC server?” Comey asked rhetorically. “I don't think that the FBI and special counsel want me answering questions that may relate to their investigation of Russian interference during 2016. And I worry that that would cross that line.”

When pressed further by Gowdy about what “factual predicate” the bureau had to launch a counterintelligence investigation, Comey again claimed that answering that question would be a “slope” that would ask him to reveal what the FBI “did or didn’t know about Russia activity” as it related to the 2016 election.

“You can't tell us, or you won't tell us?” Gowdy asks.

“Probably a combination of both ... To the extent I recall facts developed during our investigation of Russian interference and the potential connection of Americans, I think that's a question that the FBI doesn't want me answering. So it's both a can't and a won't,” Comey replied.

The former FBI director went on to say that anything related to Mueller’s investigation, to his understanding, would be “off limits" as it is an ongoing investigation.

Comey was also fuzzy on the eventual Democratic funding of the research that went into the controversial and unverified anti-Trump dossier.

Asked when he learned that the firm behind the dossier, Fusion GPS, was hired by law firm Perkins Coie – and when he learned that law firm was hired by the Democratic National Committee – Comey said “I never learned that” while director.

Comey also claimed not to know key details surrounding the involvement of Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the dossier.

Asked when Steele was “terminated” as an FBI source, Comey said he didn’t know.

Asked about Steele’s subsequent contact with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, Comey said, “I don’t know anything about that.”

The Comey appearance comes as Republicans try to probe deeper into the FBI’s handling of both the Russia case and Hillary Clinton email investigation, before Democrats take control of the House in January and likely shut down these lines inquiry.

Comey was asked numerous questions as well about the handling of the Clinton case, acknowledging at times that certain aspects of it were “unusual” while defending other actions.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...t-to-know-remember-key-details-in-russia-case
Click to expand...

Cry harder
 
jimmymccready said:
There is no deep state, though there is a deep Trump plot against the civil liberties of Americans.

There is a House GOP committee plot to interfere with the Mueller investigation, and after they leave office they can be charged in federal courts for obstructing justice.
Click to expand...
ridiculous . Mueller isn't even looking at FISA
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
As FBI Director, Comey sure didn’t know much about what was going in the agency.

Feigned incompetence is a page out of Hillary’s playbook. Bloody weasels.
Click to expand...
Kinda like Jeff Sessions...huh?

The difference being that Comey cannot respond to questions about an ongoing investigation
 
Althea said:
Kinda like Jeff Sessions...huh?

The difference being that Comey cannot respond to questions about an ongoing investigation
Click to expand...
that was the DoJ lawyer interrupting, not Comey's I cant recall. 300 times Session recused himself from all things Russian
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Comey said Hillary exercised extreme carelessness in handling classified information; because if he accused her of gross negligence he would’ve had to recommend an indictment.

For a man in his position to subvert the law in that manner calls into question his integrity. And before you go there with Trump, get back with us when Trump starts subverting the law.

Comey was being evasive to keep from lying or exposing the truth. He knows all he has to do is run the clock out till January.

Worry less about Trump’s Tweets or past mistresses and more about the culture of corruption that pervades our justice system.
Click to expand...

LMFAO
What laws did Comet subvert?
 
noise said:
Notice this section does not require "intent"

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense informatio
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more then 10 years , or both
Click to expand...

Good for you. You just proved Clinton didn't violate that part of the law. Read it again.
I'll give you some hints:
for (f)(1)
It is not gross negligence to receive emails.
In order for gross negligence to apply to her server then you have to admit her server was lawful since information has to removed from it proper place. Never mind you have to show her server was hacked to meet that part.
for (f)(2)
You have to show Clinton was aware of any classified information being improperly removed or delivered in violation and didn't report it.

I will await your evidence, but won't hold my breath because I will die of old age before you present anything a court would accept that shows Clinton violated this law.
 
Failing to follow an employers rules gets one fired. Feel free to fire Hillary Clinton from the State Department.

Failing to follow rules and regulations doesn't get you indicted. You have to actually break a law before that happens.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
It’s impossible to commit treason because we aren’t at war with anyone.

Hillary is lucky to be unindicted. She can thank Comey for that. I think it’s astoundng that she keeps injecting herself into issues instead of going into hiding somewhere.

And, yes. Not from top to bottom but people have already been fired or demoted for extreme bias by the IG. That level of bias is a kind of corruption.
Click to expand...

Language matters............ Is it beyond you that someone could dislike Trump and still be honorable enough to do their job? Justice has prided its long history as independent and bi partisan.
 
anatta said:
classified info transversing her private server. the thumb drive in Kendalls safe

https://dailycaller.com/2015/09/01/new-clinton-violations-in-use-of-thumb-drives-for-emails/
Hillary Clinton violated numerous State Department rules by using privately owned thumb drives to copy 30,000 of her official emails for her lawyer, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

The former Secretary of State in December 2014 downloaded 30,000 government emails created during her tenure in the position from her private server onto three commercial thumb drives, which her lawyer, David Kendall, transported to Washington, D.C.

The State Department released 7,000 new Clinton emails Monday, including at least 125 that were treated by the department as classified. The FBI is conducting a criminal investigation into the handling of her emails, more than 400 of which have now been shown to include classified material.

In transferring her emails to private thumb drives, Clinton violated a slew of federal regulations, including those of her own State Department.

The State Department’s Foreign Affairs manual prohibits the storage of classified material on any external drive, stating, “the flash drive may only be used for the transfer of unclassified files.” Flash and thumb drives are treated inter-changeably by the rules.

Further, unclassified material must be on a “department owned” drive, not a personal or private sector drive.

If the information on the drive is unclassified, but still sensitive, it “must be encrypted to current standards” for transportation, according to the manual.

State Department rules also required that Clinton’s email transfer had to be approved and closely supervised by a department computer security official.

Finally, the National Institute for Standards and Technology, which sets minimum government-wide standards for IT security, ordered that thumb drive restrictions be imposed if the contents were “high value,” a lower standard than classified information.
Click to expand...

You should begin by learning the difference between classified and top secret.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Good for you. You just proved Clinton didn't violate that part of the law. Read it again.
I'll give you some hints:
for (f)(1)
It is not gross negligence to receive emails.
In order for gross negligence to apply to her server then you have to admit her server was lawful since information has to removed from it proper place. Never mind you have to show her server was hacked to meet that part.
for (f)(2)
You have to show Clinton was aware of any classified information being improperly removed or delivered in violation and didn't report it.

I will await your evidence, but won't hold my breath because I will die of old age before you present anything a court would accept that shows Clinton violated this law.
Click to expand...
intent is not required for gross negligence - read the statute
.
It has been shown both marked classified and clasiffied Emails transversed her server
here is one of many sources
Comey: Classified Clinton emails forwarded to Anthony Weiner
https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/03/poli...-forwarding-classified-information/index.html
 
Gross negligence is required for gross negligence. Inadvertent actions are not gross negligence. Carelessness is not gross negligence. Failure to follow rules is not gross negligence unless it is blatant disregard to the point that it is intentional.

But if you want to define a specific action as gross negligence then we can apply that standard to everyone. That is the way legal standards work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top