Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I guess the OT is only relevant when it comes to hating gay people.
and you find it impossible to believe these knuckle dragging drug addicts weren't part of the ten percent?......that's your bigotry talking, not your brain......
[dictionary.com]
Based on the actual definition, it is not I, but you, who is lying.
Why don't you know the difference?
The Gospels were written 30 years after the fact, based on events that occured without recorders, notes, videos... Nobody was taking notes as Jesus was giving the Sermon on the Mt. The accounts of Jesus's last three years are basically the memory of old men who all had personal adgenda's and subjective memories.
Hell, you cant get three eye witnesses to agree on how an accident took place three months ago, even after they review a written police report, or there own written statement.
You're on this new kick to obscure the fact that your arguments have been destroyed. Looking back at my statement I now recognize its brilliance so must repeat it regularly.You said "last time" and clearly that was false, liar.
I guess the OT is only relevant when it comes to hating gay people.
Facts you continue to ignore....
They wrre not written by his contemporaries.
the only "facts" in discussion are the one's you made up......
sure they were.....his contemporaries were the one's who saved the documents and revered them as being written by his contemporaries......
Catholics have been debating about the use of the OT since the very beginning. Among the numerous heresies such as Arianism and Monophysitism, there was one that wanted to throw out the OT and just go with the Gospels and writings of the NT.
I guess the OT is only relevant when it comes to hating gay people.
I made up nothing.
They weren't. The pretense that it is a certain is absurd as most scholars reject the idea.
obviously you made up the "fact" that her attackers were Christians simply because 90% of the people were.....
???...the pretense is actually that "most scholars" reject it....I suggest you stop pretending you know anything about it......granted you can probably find a quote from some atheist who denies it, certainly Bruce would....but that means you should say "most idiots" rather than "most scholars".......
obviously you made up the "fact" that her attackers were Christians simply because 90% of the people were.....
Nope, look again at the claim i made in the op. Another one caught in a lie. I win, again!
Bs. Few if any serious scholars believe they were written by contemporaries of Christ. Been over it before.
??...you mean the OP in which the opening words are "Christians burning witches" even though the article says the people who burned her were teenagers high on drugs and a nun tried to stop it and the only "evidence" you have that the attackers were Christian is that 90% of the people in the country are Christian?.......yes, you're right.....you are another one caught in a lie......