Illiteracy: Failure to capitalize the beginning of sentences. Failure to capitalize proper nouns.
Logic errors: Bigotry. Redefinition fallacies (company<->royalty, capitalism<->dictatorship). Argument of the Stone fallacy. Pivot fallacy.
Can you tell us why you support Trump over democrats?
- Thread starter jbander
- Start date
Illiteracy: Failure to capitalize the beginning of sentences. Failure to capitalize proper nouns.
Logic errors: Bigotry. Redefinition fallacies (company<->royalty, capitalism<->dictatorship). Argument of the Stone fallacy. Pivot fallacy.
Where? Are you thinking of Switzerland?
Where? Are you thinking of Switzerland?
Monad Portal
Was it me?
so, back to idiot mode then.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
yes, we know you're petty.
Fair enough.
You obviously still have faith in the system and in politicians.
I do not.
None.
They are all useless and 99+% of them are selfish and corrupt.
Besides, we do not need Representatives any longer.
Back in in the 18'th century - we did.
There was just no other way to run a government as it would take weeks/months for the masses to learn about impending Bills and send their vote back to Washington.
Today, we have no such limitation.
We have no need WHATSOEVER for political representatives.
NONE.
We can ALL learn of and vote on ALL Bills simply over the internet.
In a matter of hours.
A few days at the most.
evince
Truthmatters
In his ignorant attempt to make Cuba into a Monarchy , Dr Q anon says that Raul Castro was overthrown. Her should get that information out in the public because he is the only one in the world that knows that. What a hoot!
The only way the socialism and Marxism socialism are implemented is by the means of production being owned and operated by the states and the sales of that production is designated to the state. Tell me which country in Western Europe fits that description. There are few basic tenants of socialism and the one at the top of the list talks about the means of production it's always the first one for a reason, the way Marxist–Leninist socialism is implemented is by that course. The only way the right can use their commie attacks on democrats is if they define what the ism is themselves , problem is there is already a definition and that definition says theirs is nonsense. Historically these countries know they aren't really socialist, so they tack on another word as in Democratic socialism etc. Countries also designate themselves as socialist or Communist, and in fact there has never been a Marxist Communist country ever. Ask anyone from the hate party what is needed to make it a ism, and they will give you a list that has been implemented in government from the time of Christ. If that's the case, it isn't an ism.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
For starters, because he is an economic nationalist rather than a WEF-aligned globalist. He fights for the interests of Main Street rather than Wall Street. He fights for the interests of working class citizens rather than DC elitists.
No.
They are all WEF-aligned globalists who fight for the interests of Wall Street and DC elitists rather than Main Street and working class citizens.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Idk man, Something tells me Ben Dover and Mike Hunt and Hugh Jass would be voting thousands or maybe millions of times if we allowed internet voting.
That comes from some of the "signatures" of those online petitions.
You don't have to, you know.
Illiteracy errors: Failure to begin a sentence with capitals.
Logic errors: Omniscience fallacy. Insult fallacy.
Trolling.
1) Who counts the votes?
2) How do you know they are honest?
3) Democracies are an unstable form of government. They usually dissolve into a dictatorship or oligarchy before long (Athens became a dictatorship).
4) Don't you think you bigotry is going a bit far?
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.
Buzzword fallacy. Redefinition fallacies (king<->dictatorship). Omniscience fallacy.
I am going to correct you on one seemingly minor point. Marx wanted social ownership, and not state ownership. In the end communism, the state would whither and disappear, so would have been unable to own anything. So the codetermination of Germany, where just under half of the controlling votes are given to workers, would be considered social ownership, and therefore socialism.
I do agree the socialist parties of Western Europe have become extremely pragmatic, and willing to allow the means of production to be controlled heavily by private capital, which is why I call it at best light socialism. Europe has followed the German pragmatic theory of whatever works well.
Here we agree. The American right is claiming everything is socialism, and it has lost all meaning.
WRONG. Socialism can also take the form of fascism or slavery.
The UK. The EU. Communism exists in both countries.
Marx didn't invent socialism and neither did Lenin.
Redefinition fallacy (conservatism<->communism).
I did not define it. These words all come from others that did define it. Redefinition fallacies (communism<->void, socialism<->void).
There is no 'theirs' It is YOU discarding the definitions of words.
Word games. Semantics fallacy. Redefinition fallacies (nation<->economic system, individual<->communism). Omniscience fallacy.
Redefinition fallacies (communism<->anarchy, communism<->democracy). The EU is an oligarchy. The meaning of socialism hasn't changed, despite your efforts to redefine it.