Can you tell us why you support Trump over democrats?

[Monad Portal]

No.

Because I despise both parties.

what's your number one issue?

is it anti-globalism?

what's your take on klaus schwab and the world economic forum?

are they great people with a wonderful agenda?

you probably do think that.

 

[Bigdog]

Like I've said you can't make the commie socialist crap work without you defining what they mean your self ,Your nonsense as a example "Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy." Problem is socialism already has a definition and that definition says yours is stupid. I read the first stupid things on your endless list, and they were total bullshit and I proved it. I go to the first bullshit from your hate group and then I quit reading, as everyone should do, all you are doing is wasting bandwidth. You are easy.

In a true monarchy, the gov't owns the means of production, just like Socialism.

Will you share your definition of socialism with the board? ... or will it remain a secret.

 

[jbander]

In a true monarchy, the gov't owns the means of production, just like Socialism.

Will you share your definition of socialism with the board? ... or will it remain a secret.

This is funny, here are the definition of the two you decide. MONARCHY "monarchy, political system based upon the undivided sovereignty or rule of a single person. The term applies to states in which supreme authority is vested in the monarch, an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his or her position through heredity. Most monarchies allow only male succession, usually from father to son."
SOCIALISM "
Public or collective ownership of the means of production
Central planning of the economy
Emphasis on equality and economic security
Goal of reducing class distinctions
NOW TELL ME HOW these diverse concepts cross . They don't do, they. This clowns only claim that makes his statement that Socialism is just a a new Monarchy, is that a monarchy owns all the means of production, just like socialism. , well ace there are still about 2 dozen monarchies in the world , show us how they all own the means of production in their country , These made up definitions are a hoot. The right does this all the time, The truth never supports them, so they make up the definition of anything they think they can use to make their point. Total lie is OK with them. As the above shows. These clowns are frauds. Total complete frauds. LIKE I SAID, YOU DECIDE>

 

[jbander]

These idiots get old they literally do nothing but waste bandwidth with their lies , hell when you catch them lying they try to respond with another lie to prove their point. AS above shows, That's when it really gets funny.

 

[Bigdog]

This is funny, here are the definition of the two you decide. MONARCHY "monarchy, political system based upon the undivided sovereignty or rule of a single person. The term applies to states in which supreme authority is vested in the monarch, an individual ruler who functions as the head of state and who achieves his or her position through heredity. Most monarchies allow only male succession, usually from father to son."
SOCIALISM "
Public or collective ownership of the means of production
Central planning of the economy
Emphasis on equality and economic security
Goal of reducing class distinctions
NOW TELL ME HOW these diverse concepts cross . They don't do, they. This clowns only claim that makes his statement that Socialism is just a a new Monarchy, is that a monarchy owns all the means of production, just like socialism. , well ace there are still about 2 dozen monarchies in the world , show us how they all own the means of production in their country , These made up definitions are a hoot. The right does this all the time, The truth never supports them, so they make up the definition of anything they think they can use to make their point. Total lie is OK with them. As the above shows. These clowns are frauds. Total complete frauds. LIKE I SAID, YOU DECIDE>

In order to deceive, you conflate Constitutional Monarchy (limited) and True Monarchy (Absolute).

Socialist North Korea is on its 3rd King of the Kim dynasty.

Socialist Cuba is on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty.

 

[jbander]

In order to deceive, you conflate Constitutional Monarchy (limited) and True Monarchy (Absolute).

Socialist North Korea is on its 3rd King of the Kim dynasty.

Socialist Cuba is on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty.

Buried his ass in my post 83, now all he has left is gibberish. Love it.

 

[jbander]

In order to deceive, you conflate Constitutional Monarchy (limited) and True Monarchy (Absolute).

Socialist North Korea is on its 3rd King of the Kim dynasty.

Socialist Cuba is on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty.

Now he is trying to SAY THAT NORTH KOREA AND CUBA ARE MONARCHIES, YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THAT SHIT UP, SHOULD I ASK HIM TO SHOW ME ANY TOTAL LIST OF WORLD monarchies THAT HAVE North Korea OR Cuba LISTED ON THEM. YUCK, YUCK! i WOULD LOVE TO SEE HIM BULLSHIT HIS WAY THROUGH THAT LIE. NOW WE ARE REALLY HAVING FUN.

 

[Bigdog]

Now he is trying to SAY THAT NORTH KOREA AND CUBA ARE MONARCHIES, YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THAT SHIT UP, SHOULD I ASK HIM TO SHOW ME ANY TOTAL LIST OF WORLD monarchies THAT HAVE North Korea OR Cuba LISTED ON THEM. YUCK, YUCK! i WOULD LOVE TO SEE HIM BULLSHIT HIS WAY THROUGH THAT LIE. NOW WE ARE REALLY HAVING FUN.

North Korea calls itself a democratic republic

Can you tell us the difference between Socialist dictatorship and an absolute monarchy?




Your cries for help ... are duly noted.

 

[Into the Night]

I know I'm going to regret this, but show us the evidence "it was expanded under Obama". Like everything else you post, I think that's horseshit.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/21/how-the-obama-administration-weaponized-surveillance-laws-to-target-trump/

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out

https://newswithviews.com/BreakingNews/breaking167.htm

 

[Into the Night]

AHHHHH WHAT???????? I'll come out against that and so will everyone else.

You don't get to speak for everyone else.

 

[LurchAddams]

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/21/how-the-obama-administration-weaponized-surveillance-laws-to-target-trump/

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out

https://newswithviews.com/BreakingNews/breaking167.htm

I already conceded this to another poster. Pay attention.

Dickhead fallacy. Pay attention, douche.

 

[Into the Night]

Come on contribute something that is even close to the truth,

He just did. His description is historically accurate.

all you write are lies distortions or trying to suggest the opposite to the truth as being actually the truth.

No, you can't change history that way!

I'll do this quickly because it isn't worth much time. There isn't enough socialist or communist or Marxist in this country to fill a thimble.

Yet YOU claim that Biden won the majority vote!

Second, the only ones lately that want to defund the police is the right wing,

Inversion fallacy. You are describing Democrats.

and they also want The FBI closed.

Inversion fallacy. You are describing Democrats.

the Nazi's, Bigots, white supremacists and the KKK and in fact every hate group supports the Republicans not the democrats

Inversion fallacies.
The Nazi party was a German socialist party. Fascism is a form of socialism...Democrats.
It is Democrats that are racists and bigots. It is Democrats that are white supremacists.
It is Democrats the created the KKK and continue to fund and support it.
It is Democrats that fund and support BLM and Antifa.
It is Democrats that defunded police and disbanded or reduced police departments.

You don't get away with projecting YOUR problems on Republicans or anybody else.

and just about every black person supports the Democratic Party.

Lie. Bigotry. Racism.

And votes democrat.

Lie. Bigotry. Racism.

Buddy, either start contributing something or you will leave.

He already did. You don't get to order people around.

 

[Walt]

Socialist Cuba is on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty.

Just a side note, Raul Castro retired a few months ago. There is no one named Castro, or related to Castro in a Cuban high office. If it was a dynasty, it is in the past tense. I guess you could say, "Socialist Cuba WAS on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty", though the fact that he retired and was not replaced by a relative does call into question whether he was a king.

 

[Into the Night]

Like I've said you can't make the commie socialist crap work without you defining what they mean your self,

He already did. RQAA.

Your nonsense as a example

Okay. Let's examine this so-called 'nonsense'.

"Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy."

This is fairly accurate. Socialism has three major forms: communism (government ownership of markets), fascism (government manipulation of markets), and slavery (ownership of people). All three are theft of wealth. All three require an oligarchy or dictatorship to implement (in the case of slavery, government sanction to support the practice). A monarchy is a dictatorship. Socialism is embraced by Democrats. It is Democrats that support all forms of socialism, including slavery.

Problem is socialism already has a definition and that definition says yours is stupid.

Not the definition of socialism.

I read the first stupid things on your endless list, and they were total bullshit and I proved it.

Attempted proof by void. Assumption of victory fallacy.

I go to the first bullshit from your hate group

Inversion fallacy. You are describing Democrats.

and then I quit reading, as everyone should do, all you are doing is wasting bandwidth. You are easy.

Bulverism won't help you.

 

[Into the Night]

You are gone if all you can produce is lies , that's your only choice you have here.

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself. You don't get to order people around.

 

[Bigdog]

Just a side note, Raul Castro retired a few months ago. There is no one named Castro, or related to Castro in a Cuban high office. If it was a dynasty, it is in the past tense. I guess you could say, "Socialist Cuba WAS on its 2nd King of the Castro dynasty", though the fact that he retired and was not replaced by a relative does call into question whether he was a king.

You are correct. I believe it was 2018 when Diaz-camel was elected.

Monarchs do get overthrown. And the founder of a monarchy does not inherit his position.

 

[Matt Dillon]

1) honestly?
I truly hate no one.
I cannot even fathom why someone would literally hate another.

Not like someone?
Sure.
But hate?
That's for the weak.


2) as for both parties?
Back in Clinton's time?
When he was balancing the budget (sort of)?
I angled more towards them.

But since then?
The Dems have collapsed into a heap of utter uselessness.

And the right?
They haven't done anything, truly useful since Bush Senior (possibly my fav POTUS during my lifetime - though he still messed up the budget).

I have completely given up on Representative Politics.
It is impossible to not have it full of corruption at this point in human evolution.
It's time for Democratic Dictatorship.
With one person running the show until the masses give him/her the boot (whenever the masses choose) - via internet vote.
And the person they choose to replace him/her is instantly the next 'leader'.

No elections.
No politicians (except the dictator).
No political parties.
Just the dictator and the government bureaucracy to carry out his/her wishes.

Virtually no one will agree with me.
Which means I am almost, certainly right.

I most certainly do not agree with that idea. Term limits for Congress and put politicians in jail for taking bribes is what I'd do.

 

[Into the Night]

In a true monarchy, the gov't owns the means of production, just like Socialism.

Will you share your definition of socialism with the board? ... or will it remain a secret.

Not quite, but close. Reversal fallacy. A monarchy doesn't necessarily mean communism or fascism. Neither communism nor fascism are a form of government (they do involve government messing with markets). Communism or fascism, however, must be implemented by oligarchy or dictatorship, since socialism is theft of wealth.

This is an easy fallacy to commit. It occurs when you reverse cause and effect, for example. In this case, the relationship between socialism and government is very close. However, socialism is not a form of government.

 

[Into the Night]

You are correct. I believe it was 2018 when Diaz-camel was elected.

Monarchs do get overthrown. And the founder of a monarchy does not inherit his position.

Monarchs do get overthrown. You don't even need to wait for one to inherit the monarchy. Example: Mussolini, Hitler.

 

[Into the Night]

I most certainly do not agree with that idea. Term limits for Congress and put politicians in jail for taking bribes is what I'd do.

Term limits for Congress would require a Constitutional amendment, which I would certainly support. I don't think Congress would bring it to the table though, the States will have to do that themselves.
There are already laws in place (including in the Constitution) about government officers accepting bribes. Enforcing them is the big problem.