Can Republicans show me the part of the Constitution that requires publishing?

[Jarod]

this case is more nuanced.

if you sell yourself as a platform, and seek 230 immunity from prosecution ever, you are now a platform.

rebekah jones is not in this category. and she should not have beeen harrased, however, you cannot use this case to justify Twitter and facebook censorship.

you are now experiencing propaganda failure. fall back and find a clue.

Nowhere does section 230 say one must allow access to their platform to everyone. In fact, I think the limits to the immunity would stop at a point when you allow access to someone who calls for armed insurrection, Promotes pedophilia, or other wise shocking and outrageous things.

 

[Phantasmal]

Since you lefties defend the woman's sole rite to make decisions with her body, whether she makes the choice to have an abortion or have the child, all costs fall on her. It's immoral for her or any of you bleeding hearts to expect others to fund a choice you say is none of our business and one in which we should but out.

And you make fun of my typos

 

[Jarod]

this case is more nuanced.

if you sell yourself as a platform, and seek 230 immunity from prosecution ever, you are now a platform.

rebekah jones is not in this category. and she should not have beeen harrased, however, you cannot use this case to justify Twitter and facebook censorship.

you are now experiencing propaganda failure. fall back and find a clue.

A bar is generally open to anyone over 21, but if you go in there and try to start fights, or encourage others to start fights, the bartender is within his rights to kick you out.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

Straw man Alter-Walter.

It can’t be a First Amendment issue because it doesn’t involve the government. Whether not it’s an antitrust issue is a different question. Wasn’t even Pocahontas advocating that that the Big Three be broken up?

Pocahontas died centuries ago.

 

[CFM]

And you make fun of my typos

No, I mocked weaklings like you that get your feelings hurt over the use of certain words.

You defend women having the sole choice of what to do with their bodies yet don't hold them accountable for the financial aspects of it.

Bottom line is if the woman chooses, she pays all the costs. That means if she can't, she and the baby can do without.

 

[Yakuda]

Republicans have recently claimed that the Constitution allows the government to force publishers to publish things. The publishers also have to pay politician book authors large amounts of money for these books.

I always thought one of the freedoms of the press was the freedom not to publish something. If a book publisher does not want to publish a book, they are free to not publish the book. They do have to pay the contractual obligations, but not the full advance. Likewise, Twitter does not have to publish trump's anti-American tweets.

There are more possible internet addresses than there are atoms in the universe. You want to setup your own servers, go ahead and do it.

Data scientist Rebekah Jones did just that. First Republicans tried to get her deplatformed, but she had her own server. Then they tried to get internet service cutoff to her home, but could not do that legally. Finally, they sent police into her home to threaten her family, and steal her server... And she bought new server. A server costs less than a thousand dollars.

Specifically who has said that?

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

A bar is generally open to anyone over 21, but if you go in there and try to start fights, or encourage others to start fights, the bartender is within his rights to kick you out.

ok, idiot. speech is not physical violence. your brain is a smeary tableau of disjointed nonsense phrases.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

Nowhere does section 230 say one must allow access to their platform to everyone. In fact, I think the limits to the immunity would stop at a point when you allow access to someone who calls for armed insurrection, Promotes pedophilia, or other wise shocking and outrageous things.

think of the gay cake argument.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

banning individuals must also be censorship. thanks for letting right wingers know that.

true

 

[reagansghost]

there are basically nine categories where the 1st Amendment does NOT apply:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (including libel and slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

questions?

 

[Jarod]

think of the gay cake argument.

The difference is baking a cake does not result in a dead police officer.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

The difference is baking a cake does not result in a dead police officer.

you're a moron.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

could some meme artist make a cake with #stopthesteal on it in pink icing?

 

[Callinectes]

That you fucking knuckledragging morons are plotting attacks against the country. BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING.

Awww. SOOO scary! Were you this scared about portland and all the other blue shitholes this past summer? What are you really scared about? I don't want to hear what your swampy puppet masters in DC WANT you to be scared about. I want you to think for awhile about what THEY are afraid of. You are a simpleton, At best a toddler afraid of the boogieman. You've had a lot of scary bedtime stories told to you over the last 4 years by your jackass overlords. Like any good morality play, it has shaped your behavior and your beliefs. Look at the extremes your jackass reps have gone through to basically erase Trump and his accomplishments from the collective jackass consciousness. You will not be able to erase Trump's ideas from the collective conservative consciousness though, and I don't even want him to run in '24(after all he'll be 78 and I don't want to be hypocritical). But I'll vote for a younger guy with the same ideas in a heartbeat. To reiterate, what are your fascist jackass government officials so afraid of, that they feel it so important to stifle conservative thought? Do some research on the fate of German newspapers just prior to WW2. Don't bother telling me that twitter, facebook and amazon aren't newspapers, that's a non sequitur. There are reasons why we record and study history.

 

[Damocles]

right. banning off twitter and facebook is censorship. thanks for agreeing

It is censorship, just not government censorship.

The government isn't allowed to make laws that would censor your opinion.

230 allows them to censor, it does not protect them from what they post, that already exists as what you say is on you unless I ask you to say it.

 

[Concart]

Awww. SOOO scary! Were you this scared about portland and all the other blue shitholes this past summer? What are you really scared about? I don't want to hear what your swampy puppet masters in DC WANT you to be scared about. I want you to think for awhile about what THEY are afraid of. You are a simpleton, At best a toddler afraid of the boogieman. You've had a lot of scary bedtime stories told to you over the last 4 years by your jackass overlords. Like any good morality play, it has shaped your behavior and your beliefs. Look at the extremes your jackass reps have gone through to basically erase Trump and his accomplishments from the collective jackass consciousness. You will not be able to erase Trump's ideas from the collective conservative consciousness though, and I don't even want him to run in '24(after all he'll be 78 and I don't want to be hypocritical). But I'll vote for a younger guy with the same ideas in a heartbeat. To reiterate, what are your fascist jackass government officials so afraid of, that they feel it so important to stifle conservative thought? Do some research on the fate of German newspapers just prior to WW2. Don't bother telling me that twitter, facebook and amazon aren't newspapers, that's a non sequitur. There are reasons why we record and study history.

I think it's your guy that calls the press 'the enemy of the people'.

What are YOU so afraid of.

Oops. Didn't think that one through very well, did ya little fella?

 

[LV426]

there are basically nine categories where the 1st Amendment does NOT apply:

Obscenity
Fighting words
Defamation (including libel and slander)
Child pornography
Perjury
Blackmail
Incitement to imminent lawless action
True threats
Solicitations to commit crimes

questions?

"STOP THE STEAL" was a literal call to action, and the means by which they would "STOP THE STEAL" were gallows.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

^^^Has no understanding of the actual free speech issues at hand, and has no interest in understanding.^^^

^^^Has no understanding of the actual free speech issues at hand, and has no interest in understanding.^^^

 

[Phantasmal]

"STOP THE STEAL" was a literal call to action, and the means by which they would "STOP THE STEAL" were gallows.

Constructed before the riot and assembled on the grounds, it was able to hold weight, I wait to see if investigators consider it “art”

 

[LV426]

Constructed before the riot and assembled on the grounds, it was able to hold weight, I wait to see if investigators consider it “art”

LOL @ "art".

OK, if it's "art", then what was the message? Because all art has a message.