Can Republicans show me the part of the Constitution that requires publishing?

AssHatZombie said:
nor do you argue with skill, or knowledge.
Click to expand...

Disagreed. People can make up their own minds about you, me and STY.

Still, you're old enough to know that playing with fire can get you burned. Conspiring or consorting with terrorists is sure to get you at least singed if not worse.

A lot of those assholes are going to be in prison by the end of the year. Try not to join them.
 
AssHatZombie said:
obvioisly. so stfu already.
Click to expand...

You're young and ignorant but you don't seem stupid to me. Your choice if you want to ruin your life trying to prove me wrong.

You're an adult; no one can change your mind for you except you. Don't be like the whiny Parler asshole who creates a monster then complains when it comes for him.

Don't be like SYT who is certain to have a lot of uncomfortable FBI interviews and will probably end up dead or in prison.

Don't be like Stone who is supporting domestic terrorists.

Still, it's your choice. You are going to do as you please no matter what anyone says. Good luck, kid.

4u2hvj.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
You're young and ignorant but you don't seem stupid to me. Your choice if you want to ruin your life trying to prove me wrong.

You're an adult; no one can change your mind for you except you. Don't be like the whiny Parler asshole who creates a monster then complains when it comes for him.
Click to expand...

proving you wrong is as easy as farting after chili.
 
Walt said:
Republicans have recently claimed that the Constitution allows the government to force publishers to publish things. The publishers also have to pay politician book authors large amounts of money for these books.

I always thought one of the freedoms of the press was the freedom not to publish something. If a book publisher does not want to publish a book, they are free to not publish the book. They do have to pay the contractual obligations, but not the full advance. Likewise, Twitter does not have to publish trump's anti-American tweets.

There are more possible internet addresses than there are atoms in the universe. You want to setup your own servers, go ahead and do it.

Data scientist Rebekah Jones did just that. First Republicans tried to get her deplatformed, but she had her own server. Then they tried to get internet service cutoff to her home, but could not do that legally. Finally, they sent police into her home to threaten her family, and steal her server... And she bought new server. A server costs less than a thousand dollars.
Click to expand...

deplatformed? Sounds painful.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
You're young and ignorant but you don't seem stupid to me. Your choice if you want to ruin your life trying to prove me wrong.

You're an adult; no one can change your mind for you except you. Don't be like the whiny Parler asshole who creates a monster then complains when it comes for him.

Don't be like SYT who is certain to have a lot of uncomfortable FBI interviews and will probably end up dead or in prison.

Don't be like Stone who is supporting domestic terrorists.

Still, it's your choice. You are going to do as you please no matter what anyone says. Good luck, kid.

4u2hvj.jpg
Click to expand...

go fuck yourself, globalist china cocksnacker traitor.
 
AssHatZombie said:
go fuck yourself, globalist china cocksnacker traitor.
Click to expand...

If you really believed that, you'd report me to the FBI. You haven't because you are young, ignorant and afraid. Kinda normal for most 20somethings.

Just be careful to you don't fuck up your life too badly before age 30, kid.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
If you really believed that, you'd report me to the FBI. You haven't because you are young, ignorant and afraid. Kinda normal for most 20somethings.

Just be careful to you don't fuck up your life too badly before age 30, kid.
Click to expand...

I'm giving you more time turn your life around, and waiting for evidence to accumulate.
 
Walt said:
She is able to keep her website up without any help from "big tech", and even with Republicans using the police to seize her server.
Click to expand...

but her case has nothing to do with 230 protections and tech censorship.

she should not have been harrassed, but I know this isn't your point. a bad metaphor was your point, and it did indeed suck ass.
 
AssHatZombie said:
but her case has nothing to do with 230 protections and tech censorship.

she should not have been harrassed, but I know this isn't your point. a bad metaphor was your point, and it did indeed suck ass.
Click to expand...

She has a comment section, and therefore has 230 protection for that comment section.
 
AssHatZombie said:
lol. you're a moron.
Click to expand...

Whether online, or in old fashion publishing, freedom of the press means the publisher does not have to publish your views. You are free to find a publisher that will publish it.

Hawley wants his book published, he needs to find a new publisher. trump wants his tweets tweeted, find a new social media company.
 
Walt said:
Whether online, or in old fashion publishing, freedom of the press means the publisher does not have to publish your views. You are free to find a publisher that will publish it.

Hawley wants his book published, he needs to find a new publisher. trump wants his tweets tweeted, find a new social media company.
Click to expand...

that's for publishers. 230 is for platforms.
 
AssHatZombie said:
that's for publishers. 230 is for platforms.
Click to expand...

230 does not seem to have much to do with anything. It explicitly states that platforms are allowed to continue to have editorial rights. There is no requirement for either platforms or book publishers to publish anything they do not want to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top