Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
A Cain-Gingrich ticket would have the WH rejoicing. The map would look like Reagan/Mondale in blue...
With Gingrich as part of the ticket, I agree. No chance. I wouldn't mind a combo of Romney and Cain though.
A Cain-Gingrich ticket would have the WH rejoicing. The map would look like Reagan/Mondale in blue...
That arms sales experience has come in handy with his Fast and Furious program![]()
A Cain-Gingrich ticket would have the WH rejoicing. The map would look like Reagan/Mondale in blue...
WHAT policy differences did you point out? You simply stated that .....
You didn't list a single policy difference. You simply proclaimed he wasn't viable, that his time was up, because he is..... BLACK.
yeah.... you aren't focused on race at all... just policy differences
TEN years as Gov. of Texas is equal to less than four years as one of eight members of the House from MN? She is not an executive, she has not run a state, in NO way are they even close when it comes to experience.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding about racism and sexism. Discussing racism and sexism is not racist or sexist in and of its self. Acknoledging racism and sexism is not racist or sexist in and of its self. Discussing the effects of racism and sexism is not in and of itself racist or sexist.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding about racism and sexism.
Discussing racism and sexism is not racist or sexist in and of its self.
Acknoledging racism and sexism is not racist or sexist in and of its self. Discussing the effects of racism and sexism is not in and of itself racist or sexist.
Not only won't they elect Cain, they're not going to elect a woman either. This is all window dressing. Ain't gonna happen. What else is there to say? Nothing! LOL
No, I do not.
True. No one stated otherwise. You, however, were nut discussing racism or sexism in the quote I mentioned. You were insinuating that Reps were racists and thus would never elect Cain. YOU were focused on his race and trying to project your views onto 'the other party'.
Again both of those are true. I stated nothing that would contradict them. So why are you bringing them up?
Saying 'they won't vote for him because he is black and they are racists' is not the same as discussing racism. You are projecting your views onto 'the other' party.
Obviously the Dems will never elect a woman.... just look at 2008.... Hillary was by far the more qualified... yet the Dems ran to the man.... scared of the lil woman.![]()
Obviously the Dems will never elect a woman.... just look at 2008.... Hillary was by far the more qualified... yet the Dems ran to the man.... scared of the lil woman.![]()
I agree that was part of it, but the other part was simply Clinton fatigue. I dont agree that Hillary was by far more qualified, how so?
BTW, please note I did not call you a sexist for the above comment.
regardless of who the Republican candidates are, Obama will not win as many electoral states as he did in 2008.......
I agree that was part of it, but the other part was simply Clinton fatigue. I dont agree that Hillary was by far more qualified, how so?
BTW, please note I did not call you a sexist for the above comment.
I still think the 9-9-9 plan is politically impossible.
I was pointing out and discussing what I belive to be caused by racism and sexism. You can disagree, but that does not make me a racist.
Sexism on the left played a huge role in that. When have you ever seen me deny sexism on the left? Not likely!
But Palin and Bachman are just fronts, they'll never be nominated, and the republican party is not going to elect a black man for, well, I really don't know how long, but I may not live to see it. Sometimes I wonder when we will have the second black president anyway, from either party.
As for a woman, I used to fear, post-Hillary, that the Republicans were going to get some anti-woman asshole in there, riding in on feminist gains while denouncing us all the way. Now i see that's not going to happen. Of course, when I think about MS. Warren my heart does go pitter-pat. Maybe a woman president, I will live to see...
Please note, I did not call you a racist.... I said you were focused on his race and not on his policies as you proclaimed.
As for Hillary, you have to be kidding....
She was a very active first Lady both domestically and overseas, she was a US Senator 6 years longer than Obama, she actually HAD foreign policy experience.... it isn't even close.... Obama was elected Senator, voted present a couple of times and then began campaigning for President less than a year after entering the Senate.
So her experience as first lady counts as presidental experience? I agree, but thats not what conservatives were saying when it looked like she was going to be nominated.