Buck up, or stay in the truck!

I think how he handles you is hysterically funny.

Are you having regrets that you backed a Republican and now are trying to remove the "ick" from you by ranting here all day?

Sheesh Froggie. Calm down!
No, I am still backing the Republican! I think it is funny how you think Dixie is calm! and I and the hysterical one! I have always backed the person and not the party! I am not a blind follower like some on here! Thanks for restoring my sanity, you are such a dear! I am so much calmer now with your sage advice! You are the best, Loyal!
 
So, Dixie, her prior positions don't have anything to do with what she is doing today? Does the same hold true for Obama? Weren't you one of those running around freaking out about his church attendance, as in where he went? and who was preaching? So why does it matter for Obama and not O'Donnell? Remember, this is a gottcha moment, you have been set up...were you one of the really stupid people then? if I am now? for believing that O'Donnell still believe masturbation is wrong? and would do away with porn, if she could legislate it away?

Where did O'Donnell ever say that masturbation was wrong? Please point out her exact words, post a link or something to back that up, okay? From what I have read and heard, she made a comment back 15 years ago, about how pornography and masturbation were detrimental to many marriages. That statement, as much as you might not like it, is the truth. She didn't advocate banning masturbation or porn, as far as I know. It's also a pretty well-known fact that pornography degrades women, and for you (a feminist) to be defending it, is quite remarkable. In any event, O'Donnell has not made one single solitary campaign speech on the idea of banning porn. So why is this being brought up by the left? Isn't it because, you can't really debate her on the issues she has raised?
 
Where did O'Donnell ever say that masturbation was wrong? Please point out her exact words, post a link or something to back that up, okay? From what I have read and heard, she made a comment back 15 years ago, about how pornography and masturbation were detrimental to many marriages. That statement, as much as you might not like it, is the truth. She didn't advocate banning masturbation or porn, as far as I know. It's also a pretty well-known fact that pornography degrades women, and for you (a feminist) to be defending it, is quite remarkable. In any event, O'Donnell has not made one single solitary campaign speech on the idea of banning porn. So why is this being brought up by the left? Isn't it because, you can't really debate her on the issues she has raised?
What issues are those that you want me to debate with her? Pray away the gayness?
 
Dixie is dumber than the average alabama redneck and maybe not as well read. The witch banged half the guy's in her college then made a living telling conservatards like him not to have sex. This is all recent, she is the reincarnation of David Vitter on steroids. She's soo dumb she makes Palin look like and Ivy league Professor.
 
LMAO... You people are like little mind-numbed drones! I swear, I have heard that same line of shit parroted from every liberal I know in the past week.

SMALLER GOVERNMENT... ACROSS THE BOARD!
LESS SPENDING.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
MORE PERSONAL FREEDOM.... ACROSS THE BOARD!


Try to get that through your thick skulls. No, they are not going to define specifics which you can proceed to pick apart with distorted criticisms and outright lies, the way you always do. This isn't going to be politics as usual.

And Palin didn't step down as Gov. of Alaska because it was difficult. You are welcome to believe that, but I don't think she really cares what a liberal believes. If you are just saying that to maybe convince stupid people, I don't think Palin cares what stupid people think either. In fact, you guys keep all the stupid people on the (D) side, it's better that way.

Over the years we've learned what these catch phrases mean...

SMALLER GOVERNMENT... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Less oversight of their big business backers. More bad eggs and spinach, mountaintop removal and more dead miners in WVa, logging old wood forests, more water/air pollution, trade agreements that don't favor Americans, more corruption and economic meltdowns. But good for multinational corporate profits.

LESS SPENDING.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
The elimination or profitizing of SS, medicare, education, infrastructure and most govt. agencies. Basically if they cant make a profit from it, it will be cut. Only the rich deserve an education. No taxes on their big business backers (Bush's base) which is good for multinational corporate profits.


MORE PERSONAL FREEDOM.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Low wages. Labor has no rights. You are free to be an economic slave competing against cheap labor in Asia because Republicons want to destroy the middle class. Good for multinational corporate profits.

This is who you wingnuts actually back... the idiot speaking has faded away but the crowd is still there and the harm their policies have caused this country is ongoing.


Your anger has been misdirected by your extreme brainwashing.
 
Over the years we've learned what these catch phrases mean...

SMALLER GOVERNMENT... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Less oversight of their big business backers. More bad eggs and spinach, mountaintop removal and more dead miners in WVa, logging old wood forests, more water/air pollution, trade agreements that don't favor Americans, more corruption and economic meltdowns. But good for multinational corporate profits.

LESS SPENDING.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
The elimination or profitizing of SS, medicare, education, infrastructure and most govt. agencies. Basically if they cant make a profit from it, it will be cut. Only the rich deserve an education. No taxes on their big business backers (Bush's base) which is good for multinational corporate profits.


MORE PERSONAL FREEDOM.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Low wages. Labor has no rights. You are free to be an economic slave competing against cheap labor in Asia because Republicons want to destroy the middle class. Good for multinational corporate profits.

This is who you wingnuts actually back... the idiot speaking has faded away but the crowd is still there and the harm their policies have caused this country is ongoing.

YouTube - George W Bush - The Elite My Base

Your anger has been misdirected by your extreme brainwashing.
You are correct, is this what people really wish for the USA? It seems we need to make cuts, but not totally abolish these agencies that protect us!
 
Over the years we've learned what these catch phrases mean...

SMALLER GOVERNMENT... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Less oversight of their big business backers. More bad eggs and spinach, mountaintop removal and more dead miners in WVa, logging old wood forests, more water/air pollution, trade agreements that don't favor Americans, more corruption and economic meltdowns. But good for multinational corporate profits.

Seems we've had plenty of Big Government oversight, and it didn't stop bad eggs or spinach, did it? Nor did it prevent miners from dying in WVa, or bad trade agreements, or corruption, or economic meltdowns. Those things happened just the same, if not worse, with a Big Government "looking out" for us. Yes, I know... multinational corporate profits are BAD! But again, Big Government has not prevented that, has it? Last I checked, multinational corporations are still making huge profits, and I am not so sure I would want them to all go bust, it seems like that might make the standard of living go down, since these entities provide jobs and incomes with their profits.

LESS SPENDING.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
The elimination or profitizing of SS, medicare, education, infrastructure and most govt. agencies. Basically if they cant make a profit from it, it will be cut. Only the rich deserve an education. No taxes on their big business backers (Bush's base) which is good for multinational corporate profits.

Well Social Security is sinking fast, in the next 30 years or so, it will be completely defunct, thanks to Big Government who raided the trust fund and spent all the money. The rest of your rant is typical emotive liberalism, with no basis in reality. When I say "less spending" I mean, like $800 billion to fund ridiculousness like grants to study the mating rituals of homosexual penguins, or building varmint tunnels under interstate highways, while we are told it is to "stimulate the economy" and produce jobs. We've done it your way! We spent the money, but where are the jobs and prosperity?

MORE PERSONAL FREEDOM.... ACROSS THE BOARD!
Low wages. Labor has no rights. You are free to be an economic slave competing against cheap labor in Asia because Republicons want to destroy the middle class. Good for multinational corporate profits.

Again, we've had Big Government policies all these years, and Asia is kicking our ass with cheap labor. I fail to see where Big Government is preventing that, or dissuading it in any way. As a matter of fact, it is the objective and goal of Obama and Marxist Socialists to redistribute the wealth, not just here in America, but around the globe. Which means, we should all be making $71 a year, no matter what we do or where we live. If Republicans want to destroy the middle class and have everyone own a multinational corporation, the Democrats want to destroy the middle class and have everyone eating out of a rice bowl.

Your anger has been misdirected by your extreme brainwashing.

It is you who has been brainwashed.
 
Seems we've had plenty of Big Government oversight, and it didn't stop bad eggs or spinach, did it? Nor did it prevent miners from dying in WVa, or bad trade agreements, or corruption, or economic meltdowns. Those things happened just the same, if not worse, with a Big Government "looking out" for us. Yes, I know... multinational corporate profits are BAD! But again, Big Government has not prevented that, has it? Last I checked, multinational corporations are still making huge profits, and I am not so sure I would want them to all go bust, it seems like that might make the standard of living go down, since these entities provide jobs and incomes with their profits.



Well Social Security is sinking fast, in the next 30 years or so, it will be completely defunct, thanks to Big Government who raided the trust fund and spent all the money. The rest of your rant is typical emotive liberalism, with no basis in reality. When I say "less spending" I mean, like $800 billion to fund ridiculousness like grants to study the mating rituals of homosexual penguins, or building varmint tunnels under interstate highways, while we are told it is to "stimulate the economy" and produce jobs. We've done it your way! We spent the money, but where are the jobs and prosperity?



Again, we've had Big Government policies all these years, and Asia is kicking our ass with cheap labor. I fail to see where Big Government is preventing that, or dissuading it in any way. As a matter of fact, it is the objective and goal of Obama and Marxist Socialists to redistribute the wealth, not just here in America, but around the globe. Which means, we should all be making $71 a year, no matter what we do or where we live. If Republicans want to destroy the middle class and have everyone own a multinational corporation, the Democrats want to destroy the middle class and have everyone eating out of a rice bowl.



It is you who has been brainwashed.
Just picture how bad it would be though if these agency didn't exist, they aren't perfect, but it is better than trusting China to what is right!

The citizens of the USA are finally waking up to the fact that international corporation do't have their best interest at heart any longer. We sadly trusted government to intervene for us, but then we realized that our politicians depend on them for the outrageous funds needed to get elected.

It is apathy, pure and simple that has caused the USA it's problems, it wasn't until it started to affect them personally that people began to notice!

Big government doing the bidding of big business! yes sir, that's our baby! Why aren't you equally made at greedy corporations for strangling the USA?
 
Dixie, conservatives have been in power for 30 yrs. Asia is kicking our asses because of your anti-American trade policies. You worry about penguins when your wars are sucking us dry. The jobs your corporate masters created are in India.

The right has a dependency on meaningless catch phrases given to you by the Koch brothers and their many 'think tanks'. What you don't get is you back the same tired corporate inspired catch phrase bullshit that is responsible for lowering our standard of living and destroying our economy. Your party wants us poor and uneducated with a bankrupt government, they always have. That's why you've become the obstructionist party of No.

I like this one...
I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!
It means... I cant stand having a black man in the white house.
 
Palinism of the Week! When asked about the establishment republicans lukewarm reception of TEA Party candidates, in specific, Christine O'Donnell, she warned the beltway crowd, they need to "buck up, or stay in the truck!"

...I think that should be her 2012 campaign slogan! :good4u:



I'm not surprised it sounded good on a superficial level, to an illiterate teabagging conservative.


But I read that god damn quote three times, and it doesn't make a bit of freaking sense to me. What the f does that babble mean?
 
Reminds me of the "Sarah Barracuda!" thread. How can anyone but a hardcore Palin adorer get excited about such a throwaway line?

If you want a good connie con catchphrase, Pat Buchanan's "lock & load!" topped the buck/truck line by about a mile.
 
Dixie, conservatives have been in power for 30 yrs. Asia is kicking our asses because of your anti-American trade policies. You worry about penguins when your wars are sucking us dry. The jobs your corporate masters created are in India.

You better check your history books again, conservatives have not been in power the past 30 years. Also, aside from Iraq and Afghanistan, all the wars we've been involved in over the past century, were started by Democrats.

The right has a dependency on meaningless catch phrases given to you by the Koch brothers and their many 'think tanks'. What you don't get is you back the same tired corporate inspired catch phrase bullshit that is responsible for lowering our standard of living and destroying our economy.

"Buck up, or stay in the truck" was given to us by Sara Palin. Our economy isn't being controlled by Sara Palin, or Republicans. Democrats have spent about $2 trillion trying to get the economy back on track, to no avail... it's not the fault of Republicans, many of them went along with the Stimulus. What's lowering our standard of living is Marxist Socialism, and it's going to get worse. You don't honestly think we can redistribute the wealth globally and come out in BETTER shape, do you?

Your party wants us poor and uneducated with a bankrupt government, they always have. That's why you've become the obstructionist party of No.

No, actually it's YOUR party who is in complete control of the House and Senate, as well as the White House, so if anyone is to blame for the dismal state of things, it is YOUR party, not mine.

I like this one...
I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!
It means... I cant stand having a black man in the white house.

Well, I am sorry you are a racist and can't stand a black man in the White House, but your party put him in power, not mine. I don't mind his blackness, it's his Marxist Socialism that I have a problem with.
 
Hmmm... Let's see here...

Stay in Alaska as Governor and continue to be inundated with smear tactics, witch hunts, and a thousand democrat lawyers trying to dig up dirt on you and make life a living hell everyday, while essentially rendering your governance of the state ineffective by keeping you tied up defending yourself.... OR... Relinquish the governorship and diffuse the situation, letting someone get back to the business of dealing with Alaska's problems, while freeing yourself up to tour the country and promote core conservative values and help conservatives win elections? I personally think she made the right choice, and I don't consider what she did as "quitting" at all. I know that's how you want it to play, but I think most of her supporters see it as a very selfless act, one done for the overall benefit of her state. But of course, you can't really relate to a politician who does the right thing, as opposed to clinging to power no matter what. I understand.

really? Not "quitting"? What do you have a different dictionary than the rest of us?

From the dictionary:
quit
1    /kwɪt/ Show Spelled [kwit] Show IPA verb, quit or quit·ted, quit·ting, adjective
–verb (used with object)
1.
to stop, cease, or discontinue: She quit what she was doing to help me paint the house.
2.
to depart from; leave (a place or person): They quit the city for the seashore every summer.
3.
to give up or resign; let go; relinquish:
He quit his claim to the throne. She quit her job.



unless you'd like to redefine the English language the way you poor attempted to redefine mathematics.....re: the Great 1/3 debate
 
really? Not "quitting"? What do you have a different dictionary than the rest of us?

From the dictionary:
quit
1    /kwɪt/ Show Spelled [kwit] Show IPA verb, quit or quit·ted, quit·ting, adjective
–verb (used with object)
1.
to stop, cease, or discontinue: She quit what she was doing to help me paint the house.
2.
to depart from; leave (a place or person): They quit the city for the seashore every summer.
3.
to give up or resign; let go; relinquish:
He quit his claim to the throne. She quit her job.



unless you'd like to redefine the English language the way you poor attempted to redefine mathematics.....re: the Great 1/3 debate


.333333+.333333+.333334=1 ...Yep, I redefined math alright! It was "flawed" you know? That's what your pinhead friends told me, anyway.

And yep, I have a different dictionary than the rest of you, mine has actual words and definitions, and not just pretty pictures in it. But it's old, like the Constitution, which means it doesn't carry much weight with you liberals.
 
.333333+.333333+.333334=1 ...Yep, I redefined math alright! It was "flawed" you know? That's what your pinhead friends told me, anyway.

And yep, I have a different dictionary than the rest of you, mine has actual words and definitions, and not just pretty pictures in it. But it's old, like the Constitution, which means it doesn't carry much weight with you liberals.

LOL, so sad. I guess they don't really do the whole "fraction" thing in your part of the country.

So I suppose 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = majik?

Oh, and while we're on the subject, how does your dictionary define "quit". I mean, please do tell.
 
I'm not surprised it sounded good on a superficial level, to an illiterate teabagging conservative.


But I read that god damn quote three times, and it doesn't make a bit of freaking sense to me. What the f does that babble mean?

Hmm.... let's see if I can dumb it down some more for you...

It's about the same as...

Put up, or shut up!
When the going gets tough, the tough get going!
If you can't hang with the big dogs, stay on the porch!
Lead, Follow, or get out of the damn way!
If you can't be part of the solution, don't be part of the problem!

You see, in Alaska it gets really cold, but there is often work that needs to be done outdoors. (work is something people often do, who aren't dependent on the gub'ment like you) So anyway, it takes a tough person to do the work in the bitter coldness of Alaska, and some people can't handle it. So they came up with this saying, for when they go out in the truck to do a job. Buck up, means to "get tough" or... stay in the truck (where it's warm) because you're a pussy who can't 'buck up' and get the job done.

You know, it's really hard to imagine someone so profoundly stupid as to not understand what "Buck up, or stay in the truck" means, and needs to have it explained to them like a kindergartner. Prissy, is your mental state worsening, or do they even test you anymore?
 
Back
Top