Brits send gunboat as ' message ' to Russia.

You have to laugh- the ' Scarborough Shoal ' ! You know- like the Xing Chi Islands just off Scotland . Haw, haw........haw.
 
moon said:
You have to laugh- the ' Scarborough Shoal ' ! You know- like the Xing Chi Islands just off Scotland . Haw, haw........haw.
Click to expand...

You have no fucking idea how shoals get named do you? I am surprised your wannabe merchant marine boyfriend has not told you that.
 
"Apparently you are unaware that the Hague Tribunal has already decided that the Phillipines has sovereignty over the Spratly Islands. Moontwat's favourite news organ says so, hence must be true.

Hague Tribunal rules in favor of Philippines, China to ignore decision

China has caused irreparable harm to the ecosystem of ..." HM #18
Click to expand...
The most recent report I reviewed of it indicated there are numerous geological features in potential contest, and that some of them are un-named, and some do not routinely emerge.

Since China began dredge / augmentation there, and have been adding further infrastructure augmentation, it seems to me that solidifies China's claim.

I'm not talking bad about the Hague. But it's not clear to me on what basis its declaration was made, what factors were considered, what factors were ignored, and whether these criteria were agreed upon by interested parties (a long list, including the U.S.).

If the sovereignty is still contested, you seem to believe it is, and my most recent information on it is that it is; then can we consider the Hague declaration binding?

The way to resolve these territorial disputes is to:
- name & precisely locate each contested geological feature
- get all parties to agree to the criteria to used for declaring ownership
- get all parties to agree to the decision making body & process, &
- agree in advance that the arbitration is binding.

I gather these clowns haven't done that.
 
Sailor said:
You have no fucking idea how shoals get named do you? I am surprised your wannabe merchant marine boyfriend has not told you that.
Click to expand...

Ooohy lookie- ol' bath-tub has turned to try to impress with his Herman Melville shanty gleanings Haw, haw.......haw.

' Avast ye, Queequeg, what name shall we give this 'ere shoal ? Hows about ' Scarborough ' ? ' Haw, haw.......haw.
 
moon said:
Ooohy lookie- ol' bath-tub has turned to try to impress with his Herman Melville shanty gleanings Haw, haw.......haw.

' Avast ye, Queequeg, what name shall we give this 'ere shoal ? Hows about ' Scarborough ' ? ' Haw, haw.......haw.
Click to expand...

I like the way you grovel when you get kicked in the ass with your own stupidity.
 
Sailor said:
I like the way you grovel when you get kicked in the ass with your own stupidity.
Click to expand...

Says the fraud with the rubber synapses Haw, haw.........haw.


Keep it up, mouthy- and I'll really fuck up your christmas. Otherwise go in peace in this season of goodwill. Your call, moron.
 
sear said:
The most recent report I reviewed of it indicated there are numerous geological features in potential contest, and that some of them are un-named, and some do not routinely emerge.

Since China began dredge / augmentation there, and have been adding further infrastructure augmentation, it seems to me that solidifies China's claim.

I'm not talking bad about the Hague. But it's not clear to me on what basis its declaration was made, what factors were considered, what factors were ignored, and whether these criteria were agreed upon by interested parties (a long list, including the U.S.).

If the sovereignty is still contested, you seem to believe it is, and my most recent information on it is that it is; then can we consider the Hague declaration binding?

The way to resolve these territorial disputes is to:
- name & precisely locate each contested geological feature
- get all parties to agree to the criteria to used for declaring ownership
- get all parties to agree to the decision making body & process, &
- agree in advance that the arbitration is binding.

I gather these clowns haven't done that.
Click to expand...
good points but dredge islands ( which expand the 200 mile limit)
should not be used /excused to artificially expand the sea boundaries
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top