MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Libby can't put a post together without mentioning his desire to have a man's balls in his mouth. LOL!
Benghazi? No...Ben Dover
- Thread starter zappasguitar
- Start date
Libby can't put a post together without mentioning his desire to have a man's balls in his mouth. LOL!
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
It is YOUR opinion about what I believed ("So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report.") that shows your complete ignorance...as I clearly stated in post 184...which proves exactly the opposite of what you think I'm for or against....
Once again, our resident neocon/teabagger simpleton that is NOVA blatantly repeats his personal OPINION, SUPPOSITION AND CONJECTURE AS FACT...and then stupidly references that.
Anyone with a GED can READ how Nova on one hand praises the Senate but denounces the GOP led House findings on Benghazi. Then, when an analysis shows how the Senate report actually deflates much of the neocon/teabagger ballyhoo, Nova just ignores that content...as he does with any and all information put forth by others who DOCUMENT what they say. It's obvious Nova is just not smart enough to see the conclusive contradiction of his posts.
I can't venture a guess on if your ignorance is willful or just something you can't help...whatever, your ignorance is undeniable.
If you have such a hard time distinguishing the facts from the reports mentioned in my post from my opinions that only shows your total lack of reading comprehension.
But do rant on, its almost entertaining....
And as our intellectually impotent teabagger roosters crows his delusional triumph, the objective, rational reader will take this into note:
In fact, the Senate intelligence report echoes many of the themes of the earlier report by the Accountability Review Board, which noted “systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies.” Warnings about deteriorating conditions in Benghazi were ignored; proposals to add more security there were rejected; even as evidence mounted of al-Qaeda’s growing power in Benghazi, the State Department failed to respond adequately. The Senate report makes clear that some important security mistakes were made by Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the courageous but sometimes incautious diplomat who was among those who died in the attack.
Driving the Republican jihad was a claim, first reported in October 2012 by Fox News, that CIA personnel had wanted to respond more quickly to the Benghazi attack but were ordered to “stand down,” perhaps by political higher-ups. Although this claim was promptly rebutted by CIA officials, it was repeated by Fox News at least 85 times, according to a review by the liberal advocacy group Media Matters. This barrage fueled Republican charges that the Democrats were engaging in a coverup.
The Senate intelligence report addressed this inflammatory charge head-on. “The committee explored claims that there was a ‘stand down’ order given to the security team at the annex. Although some members of the security team expressed frustration that they were unable to respond more quickly to the mission compound, the committee found no evidence of intentional delay or obstruction by the chief of [the CIA] base or any other party.”
The Senate panel also rejected the insinuation, made repeatedly by Republicans, that the Obama administration failed to scramble available military assets that could have defended the Benghazi annex and saved the lives of the four American victims. “There were no U.S. military resources in position to intervene in short order in Benghazi,” the report says flatly. “The committee has reviewed the allegations that U.S. personnel . . . prevented the mounting of any military relief effort during the attacks, but the Committee has not found any of these allegations to be substantiated.”
These are bipartisan findings, mind you, endorsed by the panel’s Republican members as well as Democrats. GOP members offered some zingers in their additional minority views, but the Democrats rightly credited their colleagues for standing up to the right-wing spin machine: “We worked together on a bipartisan basis to dispel the many factual inaccuracies and conspiracy theories related to the Benghazi attacks.”