Benghazi? No...Ben Dover

Taichiliberal said:
Nova and company got their collective asses kicked regarding Benghazi, so now they're parroting (yet again) the myth of pervasive liberal media.

Let's just stop that BS right there:

How to Debunk the "Liberal Media" Myth
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/23/1204303/-How-to-Debunk-the-Liberal-Media-Myth#

*Note our resident teabaggers/neocons won't address the content of the link in detail, they'll just attack the source and generalize.*

And then there's this:

Talk radio moves debunk ‘liberal media’ myth: Thomas Elias

http://www.dailynews.com/opinion/20140113/talk-radio-moves-debunk-liberal-media-myth-thomas-elias


No matter how many times they move the goal posts, our resident neocon/teabagger parrots still lose.
Click to expand...


Bump
 
Taichiliberal said:
Bump
Click to expand...

WASHINGTON — A stinging report by the Senate Intelligence Committee released Wednesday concluded that the attack 16 months ago that killed four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, could have been prevented, singling out the State Department for criticism for its failure to bolster security in response to intelligence warnings about a growing security crisis around the city....

“The committee found the attacks were preventable, based on extensive intelligence reporting on the terrorist activity in Libya — to include prior threats and attacks against Western targets...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/16/w...nds-benghazi-attack-was-preventable.html?_r=0
==================================
Conclusion.....4 dead due to incompetence of
The State Department and willful ignorance of
the administration in general...
 
NOVA said:
WASHINGTON — A stinging report by the Senate Intelligence Committee released Wednesday concluded that the attack 16 months ago that killed four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, could have been prevented, singling out the State Department for criticism for its failure to bolster security in response to intelligence warnings about a growing security crisis around the city....

“The committee found the attacks were preventable, based on extensive intelligence reporting on the terrorist activity in Libya — to include prior threats and attacks against Western targets...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/16/w...nds-benghazi-attack-was-preventable.html?_r=0
==================================
Conclusion.....4 dead due to incompetence of
The State Department and willful ignorance of
the administration in general...
Click to expand...


GOP Report Acknowledges That The U.S. Military Couldn’t Have Changed Benghazi Outcome


In a new report released on Tuesday, the House Armed Services Committee concludes that there was no way for the U.S. military to have responded in time to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya to save the four Americans killed that night. In doing so, the report debunks entirely a right-wing myth that says the White House ordered the military not to intervene.

For months after the attack that resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, conservative media was awash in reports that on the night of the assault the Obama administration at some point ordered the military not to take action that would have saved lives. This supposed “stand down order” led to a bevy of right-wing conspiracies about why the President and his administration had let the Americans die.

“Who told the SEALs to stand down?” Rep. Steve King asked in Nov. 2012, in just one of many interviews with Republicans referring to the response to Benghazi as “worse than Watergate.”

As Media Matters reports, Fox News cited reports of a stand-down order no fewer than 85 times during prime-time segments as of June 2013. As the new report — which the Republican majority of the committee authored –makes very clear in its findings, however, no such order ever existed. “There was no ‘stand down’ order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi,” the report says, noting that the military was not positioned to respond to the attack.

“Given the military’s preparations on September 11, 2012, majority members have not yet discerned any response alternatives that could have likely changed the outcome of the Benghazi attack,” the report concludes.

http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/...military-hasc/
 
ZappasGuitar said:
GOP Report Acknowledges That The U.S. Military Couldn’t Have Changed Benghazi Outcome


In a new report released on Tuesday, the House Armed Services Committee concludes that there was no way for the U.S. military to have responded in time to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya to save the four Americans killed that night. In doing so, the report debunks entirely a right-wing myth that says the White House ordered the military not to intervene.

For months after the attack that resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, conservative media was awash in reports that on the night of the assault the Obama administration at some point ordered the military not to take action that would have saved lives. This supposed “stand down order” led to a bevy of right-wing conspiracies about why the President and his administration had let the Americans die.

“Who told the SEALs to stand down?” Rep. Steve King asked in Nov. 2012, in just one of many interviews with Republicans referring to the response to Benghazi as “worse than Watergate.”

As Media Matters reports, Fox News cited reports of a stand-down order no fewer than 85 times during prime-time segments as of June 2013. As the new report — which the Republican majority of the committee authored –makes very clear in its findings, however, no such order ever existed. “There was no ‘stand down’ order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi,” the report says, noting that the military was not positioned to respond to the attack.

“Given the military’s preparations on September 11, 2012, majority members have not yet discerned any response alternatives that could have likely changed the outcome of the Benghazi attack,” the report concludes.

http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/...military-hasc/
Click to expand...

I loved the spin on this report by the pinheads at thinkprogress, huffington, mediamatters, etc.....

the very fact that the House Armed Services Committee concluded that there was no way for the U.S. military to have responded in time

to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya to save the four Americans killed that night is damning in itself.....it begs the question,

"why the fuck wasn't the military in a position to respond to a terrorist attack that was almost inevitable considering previous

attacks on westerners in the region".......that they could not respond is proof of incompetence in itself....


So thanks Zippy for reminding me....."the spin stops here".....
 
arm chair generals who've never had to decide anything except which mop to use on the deck that morning sit there and second guess the military brass who have ALWAYS had to be in more places than they've had assets....

what a fucking patriot.
 
maineman said:
arm chair generals who've never had to decide anything except which mop to use on the deck that morning sit there and second guess the military brass who have ALWAYS had to be in more places than they've had assets....

what a fucking patriot.
Click to expand...


Chronic denial is a mental illness......does Mexico have NietoCare or will you run back to the US for your Prozac and Thorazine ?
 
NOVA said:
Chronic denial is a mental illness......does Mexico have NietoCare or will you run back to the US for your Prozac and Thorazine ?
Click to expand...
I deny nothing... what YOU deny is that you were a loser deck ape who never made it past E-4 because you didn't have the fucking brains to pass the test. And TRICARE works just fine overseas. Great healthcare coverage anywhere in the world for me and for my wife... and losers like you pay for it for me. sucker.
 
maineman said:
I deny nothing... what YOU deny is that you were a loser deck ape who never made it past E-4 because you didn't have the fucking brains to pass the test. And TRICARE works just fine overseas. Great healthcare coverage anywhere in the world for me and for my wife... and losers like you pay for it for me. sucker.
Click to expand...

That a boy....let it out....get it off you chest............tell us how you really feel, especially about those taxpayers paying your benefits, commie.


You deny nothing ?....whats that supposed to mean ?....your mental illness ? Marxist beliefs ?.....
 
NOVA said:
That a boy....let it out....get it off you chest............tell us how you really feel, especially about those taxpayers paying your benefits, commie.


You deny nothing ?....whats that supposed to mean ?....your mental illness ? Marxist beliefs ?.....
Click to expand...

I have no mental illness. I have no Marxist beliefs, and I love it that one hitch losers like you pay me every month and will be paying my wife for decades after I'm gone.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
GOP Report Acknowledges That The U.S. Military Couldn’t Have Changed Benghazi Outcome


In a new report released on Tuesday, the House Armed Services Committee concludes that there was no way for the U.S. military to have responded in time to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya to save the four Americans killed that night. In doing so, the report debunks entirely a right-wing myth that says the White House ordered the military not to intervene.

For months after the attack that resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, conservative media was awash in reports that on the night of the assault the Obama administration at some point ordered the military not to take action that would have saved lives. This supposed “stand down order” led to a bevy of right-wing conspiracies about why the President and his administration had let the Americans die.

“Who told the SEALs to stand down?” Rep. Steve King asked in Nov. 2012, in just one of many interviews with Republicans referring to the response to Benghazi as “worse than Watergate.”

As Media Matters reports, Fox News cited reports of a stand-down order no fewer than 85 times during prime-time segments as of June 2013. As the new report — which the Republican majority of the committee authored –makes very clear in its findings, however, no such order ever existed. “There was no ‘stand down’ order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi,” the report says, noting that the military was not positioned to respond to the attack.

“Given the military’s preparations on September 11, 2012, majority members have not yet discerned any response alternatives that could have likely changed the outcome of the Benghazi attack,” the report concludes.

http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/...military-hasc/
Click to expand...


So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report. The little dummy doesn't get it that essentially you have dueling neocons/teabaggers here, that essentially are negating the mantra that it's all Obama's/Hillary's fault.

And the band played on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report. The little dummy doesn't get it that essentially you have dueling neocons/teabaggers here, that essentially are negating the mantra that it's all Obama's/Hillary's fault.

And the band played on.
Click to expand...

The House hit it perfectly and that proves what I've said from the start....and the Senate got most of it right except for the tapdancing around who is the most
incompetent...and blaming dead victims that can not longer defend themselves is about as low as they can get.....


Post 184 fool....try to keep up, or better yet stfu.....you're not close enough to the band to hear the music.
 
NOVA said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report. The little dummy doesn't get it that essentially you have dueling neocons/teabaggers here, that essentially are negating the mantra that it's all Obama's/Hillary's fault.

And the band played on.
Click to expand...

The House hit it perfectly and that proves what I've said from the start....and the Senate got most of it right except for the tapdancing around who is the most
incompetent...and blaming dead victims that can not longer defend themselves is about as low as they can get.....


Post 184 fool....try to keep up, or better yet stfu.....you're not close enough to the band to hear the music.
Click to expand...

Once again Nova proves what a complete fool he is.....he references his OPINION as if it's fact, then makes absurd statements DESPITE the FACTS in the two articles and his own personal statements chronicled on this thread.

Nova is a prime example of a willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger who's pride in his insipid stubborness continually makes him the fool.

But here's a more detailed explanation that I'm sure Nova will ignore:


Senate intelligence report takes GOP tirades about Benghazi head-on

The Senate intelligence committee made headlines this week by reporting that the 2012 attack in Benghazi was preventable. But frankly, we knew that. The deeper message of the bipartisan report was that Republicans in Congress wasted a year arguing about what turned out to be mostly phony issues.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c1b69c-7ef3-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html
 
Taichiliberal said:
So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report. The little dummy doesn't get it that essentially you have dueling neocons/teabaggers here, that essentially are negating the mantra that it's all Obama's/Hillary's fault.


And the band played on...
Click to expand...


...while the Rightanic sank to the bottom.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Once again Nova proves what a complete fool he is.....he references his OPINION as if it's fact, then makes absurd statements DESPITE the FACTS in the two articles and his own personal statements chronicled on this thread.

Nova is a prime example of a willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger who's pride in his insipid stubborness continually makes him the fool.

But here's a more detailed explanation that I'm sure Nova will ignore:


Senate intelligence report takes GOP tirades about Benghazi head-on

The Senate intelligence committee made headlines this week by reporting that the 2012 attack in Benghazi was preventable. But frankly, we knew that. The deeper message of the bipartisan report was that Republicans in Congress wasted a year arguing about what turned out to be mostly phony issues.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c1b69c-7ef3-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html
Click to expand...


It is YOUR opinion about what I believed ("So Nova NOW is AGAINST his beloved GOP majority in the House, and much prefers the Senate report.") that shows your complete ignorance...as I clearly stated in post 184...which proves exactly the opposite of what you think I'm for or against....

the very fact that the House Armed Services Committee concluded that there was no way for the U.S. military to have responded in time

to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya to save the four Americans killed that night is damning in itself.....it begs the question,

"why the fuck wasn't the military in a position to respond to a terrorist attack that was almost inevitable considering previous

attacks on westerners in the region".......that they could not respond is proof of incompetence in itself....
Click to expand...

I can't venture a guess on if your ignorance is willful or just something you can't help...whatever, your ignorance is undeniable.

If you have such a hard time distinguishing the facts from the reports mentioned in my post from my opinions that only shows your total lack of reading comprehension.
But do rant on, its almost entertaining....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top