Ban Ki-moon calls Israeli settlement expansion an 'affront' to the world

moon

Satire for Sanity
Ban Ki-moon calls Israeli settlement expansion an 'affront' to the world

Netanyahu says Ban giving ‘tailwind to terror’ as UN chief says violence born of Palestinians’ despair after ‘half-century of occupation and paralysis of peace’

Ban said he was “deeply troubled” by reports that the Israeli government had approved plans for more than 150 new homes in “illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank”.

“These provocative acts are bound to increase the growth of settler populations, further heighten tensions and undermine any prospects for a political road ahead,” Ban told a United Nations security council meeting on the Middle East.

Samantha Power, US ambassador to the United Nations, said Washington also strongly opposed settlement activity.

“Steps aimed at advancing the Israeli settlement programme … are fundamentally incompatible with the two-state solution and raise legitimate questions about Israel’s long-term intentions,” Power told the council


http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...israeli-settlement-expansion-affront-to-world

Isn't it breathtakingly obvious that neoZionism is a boil on the Middle East's arse and that it has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people already- including those of thousands of Americans ?
Don't you worry that this brutal regime has covert nuclear weaponry and that it has infiltrated Washington with its agents to the point wherein many Congressmen and Senators actually vote against their own country's best interests ?
Ban is correct. We should all be affronted.
 
Isn't it breathtakingly obvious that neoZionism is a boil on the Middle East's arse and that it has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people already- including those of thousands of Americans ?
Don't you worry that this brutal regime has covert nuclear weaponry and that it has infiltrated Washington with its agents to the point wherein many Congressmen and Senators actually vote against their own country's best interests ?
Ban is correct. We should all be affronted.

Israel pre-1967 was about the same size as New Jersey. It is also less than a quarter of the size of Jordan with a larger population. Arab countries really don't give a shit about the Palestinians, it is far more useful for them to keep the status quo otherwise maybe their own citizens might start asking awkward questions. Tell me why you know about the Palestinian Nakba but nothing about the Israeli version? After all over 800,000 Jews fled from Arab countries after 1947, but that's not important to people like you.
 
Israel pre-1967 was about the same size as New Jersey. It is also less than a quarter of the size of Jordan with a larger population.

Are you offering these spurious ' statistics' as an excuse for ethnic cleansing, theft and murder ?

Arab countries really don't give a shit about the Palestinians, it is far more useful for them to keep the status quo otherwise maybe their own citizens might start asking awkward questions.

Are you offering this slanted characterisation of all Arab countries as an excuse for neoZionist criminality and human rights abuses ?

Tell me why you know about the Palestinian Nakba but nothing about the Israeli version?

Why should an opponent of Zionism applaud the victories of ethnic cleansers ?

After all over 800,000 Jews fled from Arab countries after 1947, but that's not important to people like you.

People like you ? You're on the verge of being a self-confessed ethnic cleansing buff.
 
Are you offering these spurious ' statistics' as an excuse for ethnic cleansing, theft and murder ?



Are you offering this slanted characterisation of all Arab countries as an excuse for neoZionist criminality and human rights abuses ?



Why should an opponent of Zionism applaud the victories of ethnic cleansers ?



People like you ? You're on the verge of being a self-confessed ethnic cleansing buff.

You keep banging on about ethnic cleansing as a result of the 1947 war, yet steadfastly refuse to address the many variants of that in other parts of the world.
 
Israel pre-1967 was about the same size as New Jersey. It is also less than a quarter of the size of Jordan with a larger population. Arab countries really don't give a shit about the Palestinians, it is far more useful for them to keep the status quo otherwise maybe their own citizens might start asking awkward questions. Tell me why you know about the Palestinian Nakba but nothing about the Israeli version? After all over 800,000 Jews fled from Arab countries after 1947, but that's not important to people like you.

Why should Arab countries give a shit about the Palestinians? The Palestinians aren't their citizens, their homeland is in Israel, not other Arab nations. Arab nations have no responsibility to the Palestinians. Only Israel does.

Most of Jordan outside of a thin slice next to the Jordan river is uninhabitable desert, so I don't see what your point is.
 
Isn't it breathtakingly obvious that neoZionism is a boil on the Middle East's arse and that it has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people already- including those of thousands of Americans ?
Don't you worry that this brutal regime has covert nuclear weaponry and that it has infiltrated Washington with its agents to the point wherein many Congressmen and Senators actually vote against their own country's best interests ?
Ban is correct. We should all be affronted.

The ME is an arse.
 
You keep banging on about ethnic cleansing as a result of the 1947 war, yet steadfastly refuse to address the many variants of that in other parts of the world.

Would you ask the mayor of New York to oversee the subways in Beijing ?
 
Why should Arab countries give a shit about the Palestinians? The Palestinians aren't their citizens, their homeland is in Israel, not other Arab nations. Arab nations have no responsibility to the Palestinians. Only Israel does.

Most of Jordan outside of a thin slice next to the Jordan river is uninhabitable desert, so I don't see what your point is.

His ' point ' is to divert , make false comparisons and fan sympathy for war criminals. It comes from being a propoganda victim.
 
Why should Arab countries give a shit about the Palestinians? The Palestinians aren't their citizens, their homeland is in Israel, not other Arab nations. Arab nations have no responsibility to the Palestinians. Only Israel does.

Most of Jordan outside of a thin slice next to the Jordan river is uninhabitable desert, so I don't see what your point is.

Much of Israel was uninhabitable until it was made habitable by modern irrigation and farming techniques. Much of Saudi Arabia is desert without even one river yet they manage to get by somehow. Riyadh located in the heart of the country, is supplied with desalinated water pumped from the Persian Gulf over a distance of more than 300 miles. Jordan could do the same with water taken from the Gulf of Aqaba especially if other Arab countries helped to pay for it. My point is that the other Arab countries don't really care about the Palestinian plight, in fact they welcome it. It is a rallying point for them to distract from the huge issues in their own countries and to feed their hatred of Jews in general.
 
Much of Israel was uninhabitable until it was made habitable by modern irrigation and farming techniques.

False. Whilst not being prime agricultural land the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine farmed and grazed it for centuries before the ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism coined the laughable term - ' a land without a people for a people without a land '. Such sickening propaganda has created the lie which you attempt to disseminate here.
Your ' modern irrigation and farming techniques ' have bled the country's aquifers and turned the river Jordan to a trickle of sewage and fertiliser. Because of this ecological terrorism Israeli produce is shunned worldwide by everybody invloved in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement which is , in effect, a bloodless intifada.
 
Last edited:
Would you ask the mayor of New York to oversee the subways in Beijing ?

I do find it incredibly strange how Israel has become the bogeyman of the Left when in previous times it was held up as a model for Socialism especially the kibbutzim. I guess you are too young to know about that though!

There are many things wrong with Israel and I don't have much time for Netanyahu and the Likud party. I really think that Ariel Sharon was taking Israel in a different direction before he suffered his series of strokes in 2005/6. If he had taken better care of his health then maybe he would have handed over the West Bank as well as Gaza, we will never know.
 
False. Whilst not being prime agricultural land the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine farmed and grazed it for centuries before the ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism coined the laughable term - ' a land without a people for a people without a land '. Such sickening propaganda has created the lie which you attempt to disseminate here.
Your ' modern irrigation and farming techniques ' have bled the country's aquifers and turned the river Jordan to a trickle of sewage and fertiliser. You talk neoZionist crap.

Obviously you have never heard of reverse osmosis!!

There are a number of ways to achieve desalination and they don’t all require heavy equipment or tricked-out laboratories; you can do it crudely by boiling water on your stove top. But it wasn’t until the 1960s that an Israeli scientist by the name of Sidney Loeb developed a new method of desalination that launched the process into the modern era.

Working at UCLA, Professor Loeb developed a semi-permeable membrane that made the desalination process known as reverse osmosis a practical and affordable way of making fresh water. As described by Prof. Oren, reverse osmosis requires a change in the direction that salt water naturally seeks. If you’ll allow an illustrative if inexact science lesson from a non-expert. Imagine a bathtub. Now imagine stretching a piece of fabric across the middle of the tub. You fill one half of the tub with seawater, and one half with fresh water. The tendency will be for the fresh water to migrate across the fabric “filter” and mingle with the salt water, producing a solution (called brine) that’s less salty than the seawater, but more salty than the fresh water. This is because nature likes to achieve equilibrium whenever it can – substances will move across areas of high and low concentration until uniformity has been achieved.

That process is called osmosis. Reverse osmosis does the what the name implies – it turns osmosis on its head and creates conditions where two solutions will move away from equilibrium. To achieve this, instead of using a “dumb” filter placed between two bodies of water, reverse osmosis uses a smarter semi-permeable membrane which allows only smaller water molecules to pass through. But a water molecule’s instinct is to head into the salty area to help dilute it. To get it to go in the other direction, reverse osmosis applies energy to “push” salt water through the filter into the area of fresh water. This process extracts fresh water from the salt water, leaving the salt behind. Scientists had been aware of reverse osmosis for centuries, but achieving it on a useful scale had escaped them, because forcing sea water to go “uphill” through existing membranes required a lot of energy – too much energy to be practical.

Prof. Loeb’s breakthrough was the development of a new kind of semi-permeable membrane, and a new, energy-efficient way of pushing seawater through it.
The new methodology involves much in the way of advance electro-chemical engineering, but suffice to say that the method took off, and according to Prof. Oren, it’s the recognized around the world as the most advanced, efficient way of freshening seawater in use today. And we should hope that the trend toward Prof. Loeb’s methodology continues.

“Around the world, water is still being desalinated by simple distillation, especially in oil-rich countries, which can afford the fuel to boil water,” says Prof. Oren. “But they’re changing, because water is going to be the big challenge of the next century.” Prof. Oren points out that in places like Saudi Arabia, and even in his own home town south of Tel Aviv, desalinated water is the sole source of drinking water. Israel’s Ashkelon plant is the world’s largest reverse osmosis facility, producing 320,000 cubic meters of fresh water every day – meeting the needs of roughly 100,000 people.
http://untoldnews.org/desalination/
 
Last edited:
I do find it incredibly strange how Israel has become the bogeyman of the Left when in previous times it was held up as a model for Socialism especially the kibbutzim. I guess you are too young to know about that though!

The Zionist propaganda machinery was a lot more powerful then than it is today. It appealed greatly to the post-war generation who were not informed that for every kibbutz created a Palestinian village was razed and its inhabitants scattered. The town of Sderot, for example, so often cited as the undeserving target of Gazan rockettes, is actually the Palestinian village of Nadj. Its ethnically-cleansed inhabitants were forced into Gaza- from where they periodically attempt to attack the current illegal residents of their former homes. Pete Seeger on a banjo never managed to convey this truth to anybody. The kids sitting round mouthing Kumbaya were actually celebrating ethnic cleansing. You're not so far removed from them, pal.
 
The Zionist propaganda machinery was a lot more powerful then than it is today. It appealed greatly to the post-war generation who were not informed that for every kibbutz created a Palestinian village was razed and its inhabitants scattered. The town of Sderot, for example, so often cited as the undeserving target of Gazan rockettes, is actually the Palestinian village of Nadj. Its ethnically-cleansed inhabitants were forced into Gaza- from where they periodically attempt to attack the current illegal residents of their former homes. Pete Seeger on a banjo never managed to convey this truth to anybody. The kids sitting round mouthing Kumbaya were actually celebrating ethnic cleansing. You're not so far removed from them, pal.

Well pal, there have been many examples of far more egregious ethnic cleansings around the world. I just can't really understand why the Left concentrates all its ire on Israel. I don't see you saying anything about Russia, Darfur, Rwanda, Pakistan, India, Indonesia, the Congo, Nigeria, Mali, Turkey, China, Japan, Zimbabwe, Burma, Uganda, Libya and a host of others.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top