Ban Ki-moon calls Israeli settlement expansion an 'affront' to the world

Not surprising that a turd like you would congratulate that lying, bottom-feeding dung.

Oh, sugar bear, you didn't read Billy's list, did you, it just isn't me, it is a lot of bright folks who don't engage USFreedom911 and aren't engaging you, either. I rather imagine it is only a matter of time before you make the list :), but it's Billy's list, so he will have to decide, a lot of people who were on the list have left, I am sure he will do an update, soon.
 
What cunts like lolo aren't smart enough to grasp is this: let's say for a moment that the khazar lie was true, that most jews today were converts from the 700s - how exactly would that de-legitimize their claims 12 centuries later?

1-The death cult islam started about 100 years before this alleged conversion, so the history of arab muslims doesn't much precede them
2-the so-called "palestinians" only formed as a group in the mid 1960s
3-the borders of syria, jordan, iraq and lebanon were written about 100 years ago - so these national identities are barely a century old

So if the jewish claims to the land of Israel, being "only 1200 years old" is not legitimate, how are the "palestinians" and other groups' claims "more" legitimate when they are 1100 years younger?

This is the difference between those who actually able to actually think, and scum like lolo who are so mentally sick and depraved they are totally incapable of doing so.

What title and deeds did they hold to the land that gives them the right to claim it? The idea that they have an ancestral right to the land has no legal basis, if it does, then we Americans of European and other decent besides Native American had better start packing our bags because the Native Americans have a legal right to the USA.
 
What title and deeds did they hold to the land that gives them the right to claim it? The idea that they have an ancestral right to the land has no legal basis, if it does, then we Americans of European and other decent besides Native American had better start packing our bags because the Native Americans have a legal right to the USA.

What legal right did the arab muslims have in a place where there was zero national sovereignty? Was there a nation there, or was it a mandated region under the control of the British?

As for the Jews, did the Jewish Agency not purchase huge amounts of lands from absentee arab owners?

And what right did the arab muslims have for mistreating/slaughtering the jews in the region, multiple times?

And last, most of Israel today is descended from jews ethnically cleansed from arab countries - so since they did so, and there is only one jewish homeland on earth - the arab muslims sacrificed any right to input on the matter.
 
What legal right did the arab muslims have in a place where there was zero national sovereignty? Was there a nation there, or was it a mandated region under the control of the British?

Both Jews and Arabs formed the population of British Mandated Palestine- the Arabs forming the overwhelming majority. The British were charged with responsibility for all Palestinians, Jewish and Arab,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine_(legal_instrument)

As for the Jews, did the Jewish Agency not purchase huge amounts of lands from absentee arab owners?

The concept of ' Absentee Palestinian landlords ' is a myth;

The registration process itself was open to misregistration and manipulation. Land collectively owned by village residents ended up registered to one villager, and merchants and local Ottoman administrators took the opportunity to register large areas of land to their own name. The result was land that became the legal property of people who had never lived on the land, while the peasants, having lived there for generations, retained possession, but became tenants of absentee owners.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absentee_landlord#In_Palestine_before_1948


And what right did the arab muslims have for mistreating/slaughtering the jews in the region, multiple times?

Nobody has a right to mistreat/slaughter anybody else- and the Jews always gave as good as they got in internal Palestinian skirmishes until thousands of war-trained European Zionists entered Palestine. These incomers organised large arms shipments- and terror gangs such as the Stern Gang, Haganah, the Lehi, the Palmach and the Irgun whose remit was to kill all opposition to Zionism, Arab, British or anybody else who got in the way. They murdered the UN Peace Mediator Count Folke Bernadotte;
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/folke.html

And last, most of Israel today is descended from jews ethnically cleansed from arab countries - so since they did so, and there is only one jewish homeland on earth - the arab muslims sacrificed any right to input on the matter.

No . Israel is a mix of people but most are European incomers and their descendants. 25% of Israelis are Palestinians. It's true that many Jews were driven from other Arab countries at the same time as Zionists were destroying hundreds of Palestinian villages in Palestine and ethnically cleansing 750,000 Palestinians. It's also true that many Jews went to ' Israel ' voluntarily, following the Zionist ' Jewish homeland ' propaganda.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel
 
Oh, sugar bear, you didn't read Billy's list, did you, it just isn't me, it is a lot of bright folks who don't engage USFreedom911 and aren't engaging you, either. I rather imagine it is only a matter of time before you make the list :), but it's Billy's list, so he will have to decide, a lot of people who were on the list have left, I am sure he will do an update, soon.

"Billy's list"? Is that the list of liberal/leftist assholes who make idiotic, false claims and then run from them when they get called out like you?

As for those who "aren't engaging me," they aren't because unlike you, they are smart enough to keep their mouths shut when they're massively outgunned.

They are welcome to try on occasion ;)
 
As for those who "aren't engaging me," they aren't because unlike you, they are smart enough to keep their mouths shut when they're massively outgunned.

And there's me thinking it's because you ban them from your bile-sodden ' threads '.
 
I imagine most people find life too short to waste time on the execrable moron transwarp and have put it on ignore. It seems a wholly useless phenomenon.
 
I imagine most people find life too short to waste time on the execrable moron transwarp and have put it on ignore. It seems a wholly useless phenomenon.

You must be upset that I've fucked you so many times along with the other sane posters here, isn't that true, nazi dog?

Hilarious how a turd like you calls others nazis, but you yourself come from a family of the real thing. Did you enjoy hiding out in Argentina with the rest of the SS, idiot? I'll bet your parents became excellent Schweinehalters, eh Adolf?
 
You must be upset that I've fucked you so many times along with the other sane posters here, isn't that true, nazi dog?

Hilarious how a turd like you calls others nazis, but you yourself come from a family of the real thing. Did you enjoy hiding out in Argentina with the rest of the SS, idiot? I'll bet your parents became excellent Schweinehalters, eh Adolf?

All the bluster of a willing kapo.
 
These neozionist-supportive arses would find it difficult to engage with any half-decent sheep.- let alone get to shag one.

I finally looked thru that wiki source on neo-Zionism. It appears to be a combination of ultra-nationalism coupled with religious belief
that the lands after 1967 are somehow an intractable, and permanent ( not to be negotiated) part of Israel -and further should be part of Israel proper.

I suppose this is how the idea of the settlements are "natural outgrowths" of Israle is bandied around?
 
I finally looked thru that wiki source on neo-Zionism. It appears to be a combination of ultra-nationalism coupled with religious belief
that the lands after 1967 are somehow an intractable, and permanent ( not to be negotiated) part of Israel -and further should be part of Israel proper.

I suppose this is how the idea of the settlements are "natural outgrowths" of Israle is bandied around?

They are fascists, plain and simple and they threaten the world security carefully constructed over sixty-odd years by the architects of the United Nations.
 
I finally looked thru that wiki source on neo-Zionism. It appears to be a combination of ultra-nationalism coupled with religious belief
that the lands after 1967 are somehow an intractable, and permanent ( not to be negotiated) part of Israel -and further should be part of Israel proper.

I suppose this is how the idea of the settlements are "natural outgrowths" of Israle is bandied around?

HEY; if they didn't want to lose land get their asses kicked, then maybe they shouldn't have attacked Israel. :dunno:
 
HEY; if they didn't want to lose land get their asses kicked, then maybe they shouldn't have attacked Israel. :dunno:

You're not allowed to ask tough questions, or point out the lunatic hypocrisy of the far left trash / jew-haters, they simply will not allow it.

Also note how they demand sovereignty and self-rule for the arab muslims - but absolutely will not tolerate or accept the same for the jews, or anyone else.

As I said, once you start drilling down and analyzing the nonsense that the leftist trash spews about Israel, their lies fall apart like a house of cards. THAT"S WHY they do not want you asking tough questions that expose them; it will destroy their whole false narrative about the arab muslims being anything but victims in this situation, despite being the aggressor for centuries.
 
You're not allowed to ask tough questions, or point out the lunatic hypocrisy of the far left trash / jew-haters, they simply will not allow it.

Also note how they demand sovereignty and self-rule for the arab muslims - but absolutely will not tolerate or accept the same for the jews, or anyone else.

As I said, once you start drilling down and analyzing the nonsense that the leftist trash spews about Israel, their lies fall apart like a house of cards. THAT"S WHY they do not want you asking tough questions that expose them; it will destroy their whole false narrative about the arab muslims being anything but victims in this situation, despite being the aggressor for centuries.

I would support the idea of Israel going back to the 1967 borders; but with a caveat.
The very first time that a rocket is fired into Israel, or a sniper kills someone from the Golan heights, or one Israeli citizen is killed by a suicide bomber or by someone wielding a knife, and the rest of the world sits back and allows Israel to deal with the situation, in what ever manner they see fit.

For example:
Hamas or some other idiot fires a rocket from the Palestinian area and Israel can make the entire area a parking lot, if they so wish.
The Golan Heights are used to attack Israel and Israel can make the area into the Golan Ditch, if that's what Israel figures needs to be done.
Some other country decides to launch and attack and the rest of the world can sit back and watch that country become a smoking hole in the ground, if Israel so wishes.

Who's all for that??
 
Back
Top