"At least 11 dead in Virginia Beach mass shooting at municipal center"

Do liberals ever have a solution that ISN'T violating the constitutional rights of innocent people?

thumbnail


NOPE...all things are served by making everyone SUBSERVIENT...
 
Well given that for some time now we have had as many guns out there as people your simplistic drawing and logic is bogus, the mass shootings, slaughter of innocent people, just keep increasing

Given that your IDIOTIC COMMENT in no way refutes the OBVIOUS LOGIC of mine, no one should be surprised....should they?


The shootings were in a GUN FREE ZONE, where NO LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN COULD DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THE CRIMINAL....that worked GREAT didn't it?
 
“A longtime public utilities employee opened fire on co-workers at a municipal center in Virginia Beach on Friday, killing 12 people and wounding at least four others before police fatally shot him in a heated gun battle.”

Had one of those victims had a gun, none or only a few might have been killed.

Shooters love gunfree zones.
 
‘those that are mature enough to accept the responsibility of gun ownership“ isn’t mentioned in the Second Amendment.
 
Given that your IDIOTIC COMMENT in no way refutes the OBVIOUS LOGIC of mine, no one should be surprised....should they?


The shootings were in a GUN FREE ZONE, where NO LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN COULD DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THE CRIMINAL....that worked GREAT didn't it?

Do you pack 24/7, shitstain?

Even if you do, if one wished you harm, you’re fucking dead.
 
“A longtime public utilities employee opened fire on co-workers at a municipal center in Virginia Beach on Friday, killing 12 people and wounding at least four others before police fatally shot him in a heated gun battle.”

Had one of those victims had a gun, none or only a few might have been killed.

Shooters love gunfree zones.

You don’t know “had/would” from shit, halfwit.
 
Given that your IDIOTIC COMMENT in no way refutes the OBVIOUS LOGIC of mine, no one should be surprised....should they?


The shootings were in a GUN FREE ZONE, where NO LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN COULD DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THE CRIMINAL....that worked GREAT didn't it?

Sure it does, you are telling us more guns are the solution, we all should be armed, which as I noted is bogus since currently we have as many guns out there as we do people and the mass shootings just keep happening

Need further proof, for the most part, those States with stricter gun laws generally have less gun homicides than those with open gun laws, another fact negating your stick men

No matter how many targets you think you are defending by having everyone carry you still can't defend against the unexpected nor the number of targets, the person and target are two variables no one can control, but we can control that which makes it all possible, the gun

And lastly, just as Vegas showed us, a good number of those shooters were LAW ABIDING CITIZENS till the second they opened fire
 
‘those that are mature enough to accept the responsibility of gun ownership“ isn’t mentioned in the Second Amendment.

"earl," did you skip high school, everyone knows that no constitutional right, none, zero, are absolute, they all can be regulated, and they all are, it is perfectly legal and constitutional to limit who owns a gun and who doesn't

Always amazed at supposed people who tell us they love the Constitution know so little about the Constitution
 
“A longtime public utilities employee opened fire on co-workers at a municipal center in Virginia Beach on Friday, killing 12 people and wounding at least four others before police fatally shot him in a heated gun battle.”

Had one of those victims had a gun, none or only a few might have been killed.

Shooters love gunfree zones.

"earl" you don't know that, and can't assume it, and what is the acceptance "few," eight, six, three, whatever it is they are still innocent people slaughtered by a guy with a gun
 
Back
Top