Are Confederate soldiers considered US vets?

So he never went to trial, there was no conviction, nor was he found guilty of anything; ergo: you have nothing. :good4u:

Nixon was not convicted of anything either... do you believe he remains a fine honourable, law abiding fellow as well?
Same could be asked about Hitler.
I have history and morality on my side, racist.
Lee was an unconvicted traitor.
 
Nixon was not convicted of anything either... do you believe he remains a fine honourable, law abiding fellow as well?
Same could be asked about Hitler.
I have history and morality on my side, racist.
Lee was an unconvicted traitor.

I love how you want to move the goalposts, once it's revealed how feeble your lies are.

Lee was never arrested or convicted and there's nothing you can do to change that.

:dealwithit:
 
I love how you want to move the goalposts, once it's revealed how feeble your lies are.

Lee was never arrested or convicted and there's nothing you can do to change that.

:dealwithit:

You did not answer my question, racist.
Are Nixon and Hitler held in the same high esteem you hold Lee in because they escaped court convictions?
At the time congress and President Johnson were quite prepared to convict Lee and have him hung.
Like Ford, Grant gave the criminal a reprieve.
That is not a finding of "not guilty".
Lookup the words magnanimous and reprieve.
You may learn something, racist.
 
You did not answer my question, racist.
Are Nixon and Hitler held in the same high esteem you hold Lee in because they escaped court convictions?
At the time congress and President Johnson were quite prepared to convict Lee and have him hung.
Like Ford, Grant gave the criminal a reprieve.
That is not a finding of "not guilty".
Lookup the words magnanimous and reprieve.
You may learn something, racist.

You seem to be obsessed with wanting me to prove things, for you.

Are you so feeble minded, that you can't prove them yourself? :D
 
It's actually sort of hard to believe that this has become any kind of "valid" talking point in this debate.

It shows how far we have veered off course under Trump. He is not a leader who has any credibility in the area of morality.

no not at all,my ggf served in the 6th louisiana cav,would the left have me disown him.

i submit that if you put the average union soldier on a witness stand under oath,and ask him why he fought , he would say to preserve the union.
 
Thanks for agreeing that you are obsessed with trying to get me to prove things for you.

Must be, because you can't prove it yourself.

So sad. :palm:

You have provided, to the entire board, all the proof needed that you are a racist and a nazi sympathizer...
Thanks for playing, racist.
 
You have provided, to the entire board, all the proof needed that you are a racist and a nazi sympathizer...
Thanks for playing, racist.

I feel terrible now, because I've reduced you to a whimpering puddle; that is only able to post the same comment, on different threads.

But if the proof has been provided; then it should be easy for someone, even handicapped the way you are, to quote it. :D
 
After all that, I'd say no, but regardless, the bigger question is why are people so worked up over removing these statues? The Confederacy was a separate nation, and that separate nation is responsible for the deaths of millions of Americans, so,why is it important to maintain statues of Confederate leaders?

Everyone has to pick their battles, and for conservatives this is a damn silly one to get involved in

Then you must think Lincoln's claim of preserving the union was bullshit.
 
no not at all,my ggf served in the 6th louisiana cav,would the left have me disown him.

i submit that if you put the average union soldier on a witness stand under oath,and ask him why he fought , he would say to preserve the union.

Preserving the union was the claim Lincoln made.
 
Preserving the union was the claim Lincoln made.

so you are going to tell me in 1862 the union soldiers where fighting to free the slaves,give me a brake.

“The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals.”

just like now,this is not about the kkk or the nazis,this is about control,by the left in both parties.
 
I feel terrible now, because I've reduced you to a whimpering puddle; that is only able to post the same comment, on different threads.

But if the proof has been provided; then it should be easy for someone, even handicapped the way you are, to quote it. :D

OK ... feel terrible, racist.
We all know what you are,racist.
 
so you are going to tell me in 1862 the union soldiers where fighting to free the slaves,give me a brake.

“The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals.”

just like now,this is not about the kkk or the nazis,this is about control,by the left in both parties.

So, you prefer the CSA over the USA?
 
I never thought there was, it's like, how low can we go.

Chris Cantwell has stated more people will die, there is now a warrant out for his arrest. He is crying over it, not such a tough guy now. I wonder if he will have a cell by himself till he can get bail? Wonder if he will wear one of his cute little tshirts?

USFREEDUMB is now supporting Nazis as well as white supremacists...
He refuses to denounce any of them...
He is a faithful racist.
I didn't think even he could go that low...But that's where he is...
Sad...
 
Originally Posted by Thing1

They fought to preserve slavery.

Just in case you missed that: they fought to preserve slavery.

no, they did not. stop spreading bullshit lies.

Mississippi's Declaration of Secession, 1861

In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp
.
 
USFREEDUMB is now supporting Nazis as well as white supremacists...
He refuses to denounce any of them...
He is a faithful racist.
I didn't think even he could go that low...But that's where he is...
Sad...

This is amusing. :D

Do you think you could quote my comments, that you say show support for Nazi's or White Supremacists.

Just think how much such quotes would support your accusation!!

But you won't; because you can't.

You're just another liberal who's letting their alligator mouth, write checks that you're hummingbird ass can't cash.

:dealwithit:
 
This is amusing. :D

Do you think you could quote my comments, that you say show support for Nazi's or White Supremacists.

Just think how much such quotes would support your accusation!!

But you won't; because you can't.



:dealwithit:

Will you denounce Nazis as evil people?

No response ... only a deal with it gif

We have our answer...
By the way, racist ... the staunch liberal socialist Carl Sagan looks great in those sunglasses ...
Deal with that, Nazi racist.
 
Back
Top