Another conservative "Tough Guy"

Yes no matter how fucked up your ideas or positions are on any issue you can always find some other ignorant bastard who is just as fucked up as you are on the web, and doesn't that make you feel so much better about being all fucked up? But to the rest of us, it still looks like you just found someone else who is just as fucked up as your are tommy, so don't think this is doing anything more than confirming how fucked up you are!

I wondered how long it would take before you wheeled out old Scarlett, frankly my dear I don't give a damn!!
 
It's too much fun giving you a little poke and watching you explode your violent hate of women all over the place. A flaw in my otherwise sterling character to be sure.

I don't hate women in the slightest, but I do hate gender feminists and wimmin like you that use issues like DV to promote their agenda. Errin Pizzey, who I have the utmost respect for, says it much better than I can. She had her life threatened on more than one occasion by people like you for the sin of allowing men to work in her womens' shelters.

Anyway much as it has been a delight to chat to you I have to take my youngest son back to his university now. Maybe you should reread the Prince to get some more ideas?

 
Last edited:
I see that, as a good Darlak, you have been thoroughly briefed.

[SIZE=-1]Trudy W. Schuett is an Arizona-based online veteran with 10 years in cyberspace; an author and multiblogger.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]I’ve followed the issue of Climategate with great interest, as it has seemed that the issue has mirrored events in the field of domestic violence and partner abuse. Abusegate also occurred due to money, political power, and careers at stake.

Where Abusegate is concerned, however, there is one more element – the life or death of feminism, and its determination to liberate women from the so-called “oppression” of marriage and family. The story of Abusegate is as much about the attempt by feminists to obscure their real intentions as it is about feminist attempts to conceal the reality of partner abuse, in order to claim the issue as their own, and possibly the only issue available at the time to keep this essentially destructive philosophy alive.

As Joanne Nova, [1] Australian science writer has said, “Science has come full-circle, taking a page from the medieval Church by using fear and persecution to silence skeptics. The oppressed have become the oppressors. Given that most professional scientific bodies and peer-reviewed journals have been active accomplices in this scandal, one wonders how many other so called scientific consensuses have been similarly engineered and waiting for their own ClimateGates before truth is known.”

That quote is important because it addresses the politicization of science and research. Dean Esmay, the owner of Dean’s World, [2] where I blog occasionally as part of a group, has often commented that politics and science don’t mix. While I haven’t been in the field of research myself, it’s fairly well-known that going after grants and funding has become a difficult process, often fraught with politics and cronyism.

What feminism is supposed to be about is the definition provided by Merriam-Webster.

1 : the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes

2 : organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests. This is a current popular definition, however, and has little to do with the goals of feminism, which has its roots not only in Marxist ideals, but also in anti-male hatred and a desire for power and control over society where it is most beneficial to feminists themselves. According to [3] Erin Pizzey: “There never was a feminist movement. A bunch of disenchanted women refused to support their left wing men who were fighting capitalism. They changed the goal posts and said capitalism was no longer the battle ground it was now 'Patriarchy' and declared war on all men and the family.”

In the 1970s, and into the 1980s, feminism was still an emerging movement. Except for the halls of academia, which began to offer “women’s studies” courses, and a few academicians pushing “feminist law,” and “feminist psychology,” the general public had little interest in a movement that was so clearly designed to create antipathy between not only the sexes, but between career women and those choosing more-traditional paths for themselves.

It was about the same time that the issue of partner abuse began to emerge as an issue on the public radar. In 1971, Erin Pizzey founded the first shelter for abused women in the UK. There were also a few shelters for women developing independently in various places in the US.

This did not escape the attention of the zealots of the feminist faith and other opportunistic women. Surely there was profit and power to be gained in promoting this cause.

According to the [4] Herstory of domestic violence, “In the 1970s ‘We will not be beaten’ becomes the mantra of women across the country organizing to end domestic violence. A grassroots organizing effort begins, transforming public consciousness and women's lives. The common belief within the movement is that women face brutality from their husbands and indifference from social institutions.”

A theory regarding abuse was formulated, relying almost entirely on feminist supposition and the input from self-identified abused women. There has never been any kind of formal research or investigation of the feminist theory of abuse; it has simply been presented as a fait accompli and seldom, if ever, questioned. A look through the “Herstory,” (on the Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse website, funded by your tax dollars) reveals a stunning lack of mention of research of any kind behind the feminist concept of domestic violence.

Del Martin [5] a lesbian activist, wrote one of the earliest works on the issue in 1976. She says, “At the outset I was told I had to produce extensive and verifiable statistics on the incidence of violence against women…I concluded that incidence and incidents of violence in the home reached into the millions. My editor deleted my estimate on the grounds that I couldn’t prove it. Since then, academia has confirmed my virtual estimate and admitted that lacking uniformity in the way data are accumulated makes it impossible to provide actual statistics.”

Lenore Walker [6] author of "The Battered Woman" “When I first began my study of the psychological impact of domestic violence on the battered woman, it was the mid 1970s and the feminist movement had a negative reaction to anything that came with a clinical psychology label…”

Ellen Pence Duluth [7] Domestic Abuse Intervention Project “Many things that we did were new and groundbreaking. We introduced the power and control wheel and its accompanying theoretical framework, which tried to shift away from seeing violence against women as the problem of a few psychologically distorted men and lots of bad marriages, by linking men’s violence toward their partners to other forms of domination—class, race, gender, and colonization. We built on the work of previous projects that held individual agencies responsible to protect women and proposed a fairly bold notion of linking agencies together and forming a community-based advocacy program.”

This is probably the most astonishing fact of Abusegate: While Climategate has at least some basis in research and scientific theory, there is none whatsoever behind the myriad programs and laws established since the 1970s by the so-called, “Battered Women’s Movement.” Even the term itself was created for its impact by feminists whose goals had very little to do with providing aid for women.

As radical activist Susan Schecter [8] said, "I believe it is most urgent for this movement's future to declare that violence against women is a political problem, a question of power and domination, and not an individual, pathological, or deviant one. Continuing to make violence against women public is itself a crucial continuing task. We also must become a movement led by battered women, women of color, and working class women. We must develop a progressive agenda, a long range vision of what kind of society is needed so that violence against women would not exist, and to ally with groups sharing a vision of a just society" This statement appears on the main page of the website for the West Virginia Coalition Against Domestic Violence, [9] also funded by your tax dollars.

Since the early days of the Battered Women’s Movement, nearly everything that has come after has been based on feminist principles devised out of thin air. Even today, in the US there is no standard definition of what domestic violence is or is not. Yet thousands of men are incarcerated, families destroyed, and women and children thrown into a permanent condition of life in turmoil because of nothing but the aberrant personal beliefs of a few women a generation ago.

While the feminists of the 20th Century are dying off or retiring, their ugly legacy of opportunism remains. Legions of divorce lawyers, shelter advocates, and organizations providing feminist education all benefit from the multi-billion dollar industry that now forms the basis of society’s approach to partner abuse.
The real tragedy of Abusegate is that victims of genuine partner abuse are still left without hope and support. They have been doubly victimized by a society that has been too willing to accept answers without first considering the problem.
[/SIZE]

http://www.federalobserver.com/2010/01/24/schuett-abusegate-a-generation-deceived/


WOW, Isn't that cute! Tommy, the fake scientist, found a woman-hating woman on the internets to support his woman hating position. Gee Tommy all you women hating men must really like this woman!
 
WOW, Isn't that cute! Tommy, the fake scientist, found a woman-hating woman on the internets to support his woman hating position. Gee Tommy all you women hating men must really like this woman!

Oh dear, I found another that will surely cause your head to explode hopefully.


 
If I don't bother you then you would just shut the fuck up, wouldn't you? It is obvious that you have your devoted acolytes, holy shit that prick Rune even fell on his sword for you!! You are also a practised liar as you have demonstrated on many occasions.

You're losing it Tommy, is Darla getting to you, again? She has nailed your arrogant and decrepit ass to the wall so many times you should be used to it by now and you should have learned to stay away from her and not tangle with her since she is smarter than you, quicker than you and a much better writer than you! It's really no contest, simple because she has your fucking number as do we all. It's clear you hate women and trotting out some woman-hater who just happens to be a woman or two or three such individuals doesn't do shit for your position other than confirm just how fucked up you are. But you are so obsessed and so sure that being a woman-hater is normal that you can't even see the position for what it is. And that is what makes it apparent not only that you are a woman hater but that you are confirmed in it as a position that makes sense and is appropriate. As someone told me once you spend days finding Black people who hate Black people and women who hate women and then pretend that when you have found these people you can then claim some kind of normalcy for your fucked up position but you can't. Just because there are people out there as fucked up as you are of any race or gender doesn't make your particular fucked up position any less fucked up. Hell even Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Behring Breivik was able to find fellow travelers on the web Tommy, so your fellow travelers aren't anything special and they sure as hell don't validate your confused and fucked up woman hating position here.
 
If the family courts in the States are anything like those in the UK then precious little is needed in the way of evidence, a wife can often just claim abuse and it is accepted. They are little better than kangaroo courts.

Yeah isn't that amazing a wife can just claim abuse in the same way that if I am robbed I can just claim I was robbed or if I am assaulted I can just claim I was assaulted and file a police report and they will take my word for it. Amazing that women are being treated equally under the law isn't it, how dare they!
 
Birth control rarely has anything to do with health care. I thought all Maine GOP were socialists. Go figure.

bullshit you fool

you see our lady parts all attached to the rest of our bodies.

Birth control pills are in fact prescribed all the time for women to help with many ailments even when the woman is not actively trying to prevent pregnancy.


see how stupid and uninformed you are?

see why you should NOT be standing in between a dr and their patient?
 
If the family courts in the States are anything like those in the UK then precious little is needed in the way of evidence, a wife can often just claim abuse and it is accepted. They are little better than kangaroo courts.

well you people who beat women and think you should be able to often do it when there are no witnesses.

why are you picking women who would lie about you?
 
There is one thing about you anyway, you are consistent in your bullshit. It is as plain as day that you are a gender feminist and care little for equality. Men have rights too and it has been proven that women are every bit as abusive as men in domestic violence situations. Not that you would know it as it is yet another issue that people like you use to pursue your hate filled agenda.


provide your evidence that what you claim is true.


pretending women have not been beaten by men domestically throughout history is pure fucking fact adverse bullshit
 
Well, I suppose if it turns out you're a chickenshit who hits women to feel strong, I'd be desperate to find a way to spin this too.

He fought the Class D assault conviction all the way to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, which ruled that “sufficient evidence does exist in the record to support his conviction.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/...estic-violence-conviction-proves-he-has-guts/

So what part of "acquitted" do you dunces on the left not comprehend. I'm fascinated that from this story, that you, the dunce of dunces, have determined that this guy hits women to feel tough. Perhaps this is you projecting?

Yes Zappas, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.
 
You're losing it Tommy, is Darla getting to you, again? She has nailed your arrogant and decrepit ass to the wall so many times you should be used to it by now and you should have learned to stay away from her and not tangle with her since she is smarter than you, quicker than you and a much better writer than you! It's really no contest, simple because she has your fucking number as do we all. It's clear you hate women and trotting out some woman-hater who just happens to be a woman or two or three such individuals doesn't do shit for your position other than confirm just how fucked up you are. But you are so obsessed and so sure that being a woman-hater is normal that you can't even see the position for what it is. And that is what makes it apparent not only that you are a woman hater but that you are confirmed in it as a position that makes sense and is appropriate. As someone told me once you spend days finding Black people who hate Black people and women who hate women and then pretend that when you have found these people you can then claim some kind of normalcy for your fucked up position but you can't. Just because there are people out there as fucked up as you are of any race or gender doesn't make your particular fucked up position any less fucked up. Hell even Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Behring Breivik was able to find fellow travelers on the web Tommy, so your fellow travelers aren't anything special and they sure as hell don't validate your confused and fucked up woman hating position here.

Oh my god. Poor creature must have ingested something rotten.
 
The part of barefoot and pregnant wants it that way. I remember seeing a magazine ad as a kid...husband takes wife over knee and spanks her for buying the wrong coffee. Methinks conservatives want their women battered... Like chicken...but that's because their brains are scrabbled, like eggs!

You think this way because you are painfully stupid. But thank you again for removing any doubt.

Dunce.
 
Shuett is a men's rights activist. An MRA. I bet Tom wanks off to her...when he's not watching rape porn I guess.

Hilarious stuff. I am well aware of her "work". In the grand tradition of George W Bush and other radical righties, she employs Orwellian double speak. Calling herself a "Domestic violence advocate" with the clear implication that she advocates for the victims, while in fact, she is an advocate for men who beat women. Very few people have heard of her outside of the sadsacks like Tom who populate the men's rights movement. Men who are seething with bitterness because they can't get laid, their wife left them, their wife got sick of being slapped around and told the police...etc. Many are infuriated that after years of slapping their wife around she left them and the "unjust" court system awarded the poor woman alimony.

I always love when Tom exposes himself even further. The guy is a monster but each time he makes a post like this, one more person becomes aware of the fact.

Considering his posts it's rather ludicrous to believe he hasn't slapped his wife or ex-wife around, and that he hasn't committed rape. The man doesn't even know what consent is. And boy does he squeal when it's pointed out that his own words damn him and indicate he appears to be a rapist and woman beater.

But you know what they say...the one who squeals is the one you hit.

Another vulgar pathetic post by the forums hate monger. Thank you again Snarla for once again removing any doubt what a repugnant low-life you really are.

So nice to see you back on the forum desperately dragging the IQ level down to your low-life level. You're the poster child of idiots and why one should never argue with them; because they will only try to drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

You're one disgusting dunce.
 
Last edited:
I actually love when tom shows off how much he hates women and indicates how much he seems to love raping and hitting them. It gives me pleasure because i love being right and each time he does it I get yet another PM from someone new telling me, shit you were right about Tom. And I just say "yep, I know I was".

Tom doesn't bother me. He's an old queen who doubtfully can even get it up to rape anyone.

What does bother me is that this monster raised two sons.

And then set them out upon the world.

And that's a shame. That surely is a shame. But ah well, I can't solve the world's problems and these sorts are a dime a dozen. I"ve plenty here in the states to worry about, what goes on in that shithole across the pond isn't much of a concern of mine.

Claiming that forum members rape and beat women because they highlight what an offensive vulgar dunce you are is the lowest form of dishonest debate imagineable.

But since when did vulgar low-life dunces like you care about decency, honesty or the truth?

Another telling post by the forums vulgar dunce class.
 
Yeah isn't that amazing a wife can just claim abuse in the same way that if I am robbed I can just claim I was robbed or if I am assaulted I can just claim I was assaulted and file a police report and they will take my word for it. Amazing that women are being treated equally under the law isn't it, how dare they!

It's almost as if these fem nazis have made it so that the police have to treat women as if they were human beings like men are. It's really an outrage and I certainly hope that Tommy and his MRA buds take to the streets in protest. Maybe Tommy is off making his protest signs now...
 
Back
Top