Another conservative "Tough Guy"

It's almost as if these fem nazis have made it so that the police have to treat women as if they were human beings like men are. It's really an outrage and I certainly hope that Tommy and his MRA buds take to the streets in protest. Maybe Tommy is off making his protest signs now...

"Wife Beaters Unite"
 
So what part of "acquitted" do you dunces on the left not comprehend. I'm fascinated that from this story, that you, the dunce of dunces, have determined that this guy hits women to feel tough. Perhaps this is you projecting?

Yes Zappas, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.

"He fought the Class D assault conviction all the way to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, which ruled that “sufficient evidence does exist in the record to support his conviction.”

You are clearly reading a "not" in this quotation that does not exist. The Main Supreme Court upheld his conviction, he was not acquitted you ignorant illiterate bastard!

You are an illiterate fool aren't you? Now please show me where it says he was "acquitted"! Please point that out, specifically the part where it says he was acquitted. And do it soon. Because if you can't you are going to wear this bullshit around your neck like an albatross for as long as I am here. Trust me dumbass. You will never get over this, fool!

You like to call people stupid and several other choice names but you can't even read a fucking simple declarative sentence and get the meaning correct!

You really are that stupid you arrogant fuck!
 
Claiming that forum members rape and beat women because they highlight what an offensive vulgar dunce you are is the lowest form of dishonest debate imagineable.

But since when did vulgar low-life dunces like you care about decency, honesty or the truth?

Another telling post by the forums vulgar dunce class.


You are probably the biggest dunce here you fucking fool. You can't even read a simple declarative sentence and get the meaning correct. That makes you one of the more ignorant bastards on this site!
 
"He fought the Class D assault conviction all the way to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, which ruled that “sufficient evidence does exist in the record to support his conviction.”

You are clearly reading a "not" in this quotation that does not exist. The Main Supreme Court upheld his conviction, he was not acquitted you ignorant illiterate bastard!

You are an illiterate fool aren't you? Now please show me where it says he was "acquitted"! Please point that out, specifically the part where it says he was acquitted. And do it soon. Because if you can't you are going to wear this bullshit around your neck like an albatross for as long as I am here. Trust me dumbass. You will never get over this, fool!

You like to call people stupid and several other choice names but you can't even read a fucking simple declarative sentence and get the meaning correct!

You really are that stupid you arrogant fuck!

Yeah, it was never even overturned no less "he was aquited". It's amazing the lengths these righty pigs will go to defend any Republican of anything. They made a hero out of reality tv show star who gave an interview about man's anuses (which was a real Jesus moment because everyone knows Jesus died for the right to talk about men's assholes on television - it's totally in the bible) Now they are defending wife beaters and even lying and claiming they weren't convicted.

The man is a convicted wife beater. This is a fact. And it is not open to debate. It is not an opinion. There is no but but but.

The Man Is A Convicted Wife Beater.

And the base of the Republican party lies about him in order to defend him. This is what the Republican party stands for today.
 
Yeah, it was never even overturned no less "he was aquited". It's amazing the lengths these righty pigs will go to defend any Republican of anything. They made a hero out of reality tv show star who gave an interview about man's anuses (which was a real Jesus moment because everyone knows Jesus died for the right to talk about men's assholes on television - it's totally in the bible) Now they are defending wife beaters and even lying and claiming they weren't convicted.

The man is a convicted wife beater. This is a fact. And it is not open to debate. It is not an opinion. There is no but but but.

The Man Is A Convicted Wife Beater.

And the base of the Republican party lies about him in order to defend him. This is what the Republican party stands for today.


It's fucking incredible isn't it!

Republican logic: say it isn't so, who will know!

He even denied it in the face of the quote that says the exact opposite and then has the gall to call others stupid!

Incredible!!
 
Yeah, it was never even overturned no less "he was aquited". It's amazing the lengths these righty pigs will go to defend any Republican of anything. They made a hero out of reality tv show star who gave an interview about man's anuses (which was a real Jesus moment because everyone knows Jesus died for the right to talk about men's assholes on television - it's totally in the bible) Now they are defending wife beaters and even lying and claiming they weren't convicted.

The man is a convicted wife beater. This is a fact. And it is not open to debate. It is not an opinion. There is no but but but.

The Man Is A Convicted Wife Beater.

And the base of the Republican party lies about him in order to defend him. This is what the Republican party stands for today.

And you defend everything from the left. What's the problem?
 
Murder defenseless baby human beings who can't defend themselves. You're a pillar of virtue, aren't you.

I don't know about "a pillar of virtue" or other worthless metaphors, but I'm not a wife beater and I don't take a sentence that says a Court upheld a wife beaters conviction and pretend it says the opposite in order to make a point. And I try not to write anything as repetitive as "Murder defenseless baby human beings who can't defend themselves." I also wouldn't pretend it was a complete sentence by putting a period after the last word. If you look in the dictionary or on line because I doubt an idiot like you has a dictionary, you will find that the word "defenseless" means unable to defend themselves. But your whole statement here is nothing but ad hominem bullshit and that shit doesn't work with me "ditto head."
 
And you defend everything from the left. What's the problem?

No problem, you're just as stupid as the rest of the wife beaters and their defenders. And it is good to see who is who here. I am glad for threads like this in a way because they actually expose all you bastards for the fucking reptiles you really are. We now have Tommy the Troglodyte and his band of merry defenders. It's all good, no problem at all! You're all completely identified.
 
I don't know about "a pillar of virtue" or other worthless metaphors, but I'm not a wife beater and I don't take a sentence that says a Court upheld a wife beaters conviction and pretend it says the opposite in order to make a point. And I try not to write anything as repetitive as "Murder defenseless baby human beings who can't defend themselves." I also wouldn't pretend it was a complete sentence by putting a period after the last word. If you look in the dictionary or on line because I doubt an idiot like you has a dictionary, you will find that the word "defenseless" means unable to defend themselves. But your whole statement here is nothing but ad hominem bullshit and that shit doesn't work with me "ditto head."


I am pretty sure the pre-born little tykes can defend themselves anyway. Don't forget that one of the reasons Ron Paul gives for being against abortion is because as a gynecologist he personally had witnessed the fighting fetus phenomenon and even heroically joined in one of these battles shortly after an abortion had gone awry and one of the 2 month old little guys was "born alive" and came out punching.

Unfortuntely, both the fighting fetus and Paul were defeated, at least that one time. But he's got more stories like that will be releasing a compilation of these daring do's in his new book "Kung Fu Fetus".
 
I am pretty sure the pre-born little tykes can defend themselves anyway. Don't forget that one of the reasons Ron Paul gives for being against abortion is because as a gynecologist he personally had witnessed the fighting fetus phenomenon and even heroically joined in one of these battles shortly after an abortion had gone awry and one of the 2 month old little guys was "born alive" and came out punching.

Unfortuntely, both the fighting fetus and Paul were defeated, at least that one time. But he's got more stories like that will be releasing a compilation of these daring do's in his new book "Kung Fu Fetus".

ROFL!
 
I don't know about "a pillar of virtue" or other worthless metaphors, but I'm not a wife beater and I don't take a sentence that says a Court upheld a wife beaters conviction and pretend it says the opposite in order to make a point. And I try not to write anything as repetitive as "Murder defenseless baby human beings who can't defend themselves." I also wouldn't pretend it was a complete sentence by putting a period after the last word. If you look in the dictionary or on line because I doubt an idiot like you has a dictionary, you will find that the word "defenseless" means unable to defend themselves. But your whole statement here is nothing but ad hominem bullshit and that shit doesn't work with me "ditto head."

You still support murdering defenseless human beings. Aren't you just special and oh so righteous. You deserve some kind of medal. Self righteous hypocrite.
 
You still support murdering defenseless human beings. Aren't you just special and oh so righteous. You deserve some kind of medal. Self righteous hypocrite.

Do you support the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan? If you do you are the one who supports killing defenseless human beings. Abortion has nothing to do with human beings, it is about giving women the right to choose whether or not they want to carry a pregnancy to term. Giving women the power to make their own decisions about their bodies and health is not war, it is autonomy. War is something entirely different! You should not confuse autonomy and war!
 
Do you support the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan? If you do you are the one who supports killing defenseless human beings. Abortion has nothing to do with human beings, it is about giving women the right to choose whether or not they want to carry a pregnancy to term. Giving women the power to make their own decisions about their bodies and health is not war, it is autonomy. War is something entirely different! You should not confuse autonomy and war!

Different subject. Defend your position as a human baby murderer and then we can move on to another topic. Go.
 
Back
Top