Birth control rarely has anything to do with health care. I thought all Maine GOP were socialists. Go figure.
Another conservative "Tough Guy"
- Thread starter zappasguitar
- Start date
cancel2 2022
Canceled
If the family courts in the States are anything like those in the UK then precious little is needed in the way of evidence, a wife can often just claim abuse and it is accepted. They are little better than kangaroo courts.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Zippy is nervous that a human life may be saved from the butchers. Pitiful creature.
Who wants do deny WHAT BASIC healthcare to women ?
Is that the best you can do in defense of a wife beater? It's gossip? No, it's not gossip, once you are convicted as this wife beater was it is assault and a criminal offense! Just because it is a woman and you are a misogynistic pile of shit and a homophobe and racist to boot, doesn't it make any less of a crime you fucking Pig Farming Rube!
Well isn't that special: an anti-abortion supporter of wife beaters everywhere!
So says the man who believes that "double digit interest" is the work of communists! Now that is fucked up, because we all know that banks, bankers, and credit card companies are all commies and communist entities. You bet!
Yeah, its getting so a wife beater or rapist isn't safe anywhere isn't it? It's too bad that courts have started taking the word of women when they show up at hospitals bruised and battered and say that they were beaten by their husbands or boyfriends. How dare such organizations do such a thing. Don't they know that all women are liars who actually beat themselves and then run to hospital to claim battery just to get even with a cheating spouse or an errant lover. It happens so often in fact that it is just a damn travesty isn't it, tommy? I bet you even have a friend or two who has suffered this indignity don't you? Sure you do! Maybe even a close friend! Who knows! You sure appear to be speaking with the authority of someone with some kind of special knowledge of this!
Neither does viagra! But I bet you would hate to have to pay $25 a pill wouldn't you? I bet you need to take two to get it up don't you?
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
The only people who say this are simple minded fools who believe that the only time birth control is "health care" is when it's prescribed by a doctor to treat an underlying medical condition. This is false.
THe planning and spacing of her children:
Basic Health Care.
Always.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I see that, as a good Darlak, you have been thoroughly briefed.
[SIZE=-1]Trudy W. Schuett is an Arizona-based online veteran with 10 years in cyberspace; an author and multiblogger.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]I’ve followed the issue of Climategate with great interest, as it has seemed that the issue has mirrored events in the field of domestic violence and partner abuse. Abusegate also occurred due to money, political power, and careers at stake.
Where Abusegate is concerned, however, there is one more element – the life or death of feminism, and its determination to liberate women from the so-called “oppression” of marriage and family. The story of Abusegate is as much about the attempt by feminists to obscure their real intentions as it is about feminist attempts to conceal the reality of partner abuse, in order to claim the issue as their own, and possibly the only issue available at the time to keep this essentially destructive philosophy alive.
As Joanne Nova, [1] Australian science writer has said, “Science has come full-circle, taking a page from the medieval Church by using fear and persecution to silence skeptics. The oppressed have become the oppressors. Given that most professional scientific bodies and peer-reviewed journals have been active accomplices in this scandal, one wonders how many other so called scientific consensuses have been similarly engineered and waiting for their own ClimateGates before truth is known.”
That quote is important because it addresses the politicization of science and research. Dean Esmay, the owner of Dean’s World, [2] where I blog occasionally as part of a group, has often commented that politics and science don’t mix. While I haven’t been in the field of research myself, it’s fairly well-known that going after grants and funding has become a difficult process, often fraught with politics and cronyism.
What feminism is supposed to be about is the definition provided by Merriam-Webster.
1 : the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes
2 : organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests. This is a current popular definition, however, and has little to do with the goals of feminism, which has its roots not only in Marxist ideals, but also in anti-male hatred and a desire for power and control over society where it is most beneficial to feminists themselves. According to [3] Erin Pizzey: “There never was a feminist movement. A bunch of disenchanted women refused to support their left wing men who were fighting capitalism. They changed the goal posts and said capitalism was no longer the battle ground it was now 'Patriarchy' and declared war on all men and the family.”
In the 1970s, and into the 1980s, feminism was still an emerging movement. Except for the halls of academia, which began to offer “women’s studies” courses, and a few academicians pushing “feminist law,” and “feminist psychology,” the general public had little interest in a movement that was so clearly designed to create antipathy between not only the sexes, but between career women and those choosing more-traditional paths for themselves.
It was about the same time that the issue of partner abuse began to emerge as an issue on the public radar. In 1971, Erin Pizzey founded the first shelter for abused women in the UK. There were also a few shelters for women developing independently in various places in the US.
This did not escape the attention of the zealots of the feminist faith and other opportunistic women. Surely there was profit and power to be gained in promoting this cause.
According to the [4] Herstory of domestic violence, “In the 1970s ‘We will not be beaten’ becomes the mantra of women across the country organizing to end domestic violence. A grassroots organizing effort begins, transforming public consciousness and women's lives. The common belief within the movement is that women face brutality from their husbands and indifference from social institutions.”
A theory regarding abuse was formulated, relying almost entirely on feminist supposition and the input from self-identified abused women. There has never been any kind of formal research or investigation of the feminist theory of abuse; it has simply been presented as a fait accompli and seldom, if ever, questioned. A look through the “Herstory,” (on the Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse website, funded by your tax dollars) reveals a stunning lack of mention of research of any kind behind the feminist concept of domestic violence.
Del Martin [5] a lesbian activist, wrote one of the earliest works on the issue in 1976. She says, “At the outset I was told I had to produce extensive and verifiable statistics on the incidence of violence against women…I concluded that incidence and incidents of violence in the home reached into the millions. My editor deleted my estimate on the grounds that I couldn’t prove it. Since then, academia has confirmed my virtual estimate and admitted that lacking uniformity in the way data are accumulated makes it impossible to provide actual statistics.”
Lenore Walker [6] author of "The Battered Woman" “When I first began my study of the psychological impact of domestic violence on the battered woman, it was the mid 1970s and the feminist movement had a negative reaction to anything that came with a clinical psychology label…”
Ellen Pence Duluth [7] Domestic Abuse Intervention Project “Many things that we did were new and groundbreaking. We introduced the power and control wheel and its accompanying theoretical framework, which tried to shift away from seeing violence against women as the problem of a few psychologically distorted men and lots of bad marriages, by linking men’s violence toward their partners to other forms of domination—class, race, gender, and colonization. We built on the work of previous projects that held individual agencies responsible to protect women and proposed a fairly bold notion of linking agencies together and forming a community-based advocacy program.”
This is probably the most astonishing fact of Abusegate: While Climategate has at least some basis in research and scientific theory, there is none whatsoever behind the myriad programs and laws established since the 1970s by the so-called, “Battered Women’s Movement.” Even the term itself was created for its impact by feminists whose goals had very little to do with providing aid for women.
As radical activist Susan Schecter [8] said, "I believe it is most urgent for this movement's future to declare that violence against women is a political problem, a question of power and domination, and not an individual, pathological, or deviant one. Continuing to make violence against women public is itself a crucial continuing task. We also must become a movement led by battered women, women of color, and working class women. We must develop a progressive agenda, a long range vision of what kind of society is needed so that violence against women would not exist, and to ally with groups sharing a vision of a just society" This statement appears on the main page of the website for the West Virginia Coalition Against Domestic Violence, [9] also funded by your tax dollars.
Since the early days of the Battered Women’s Movement, nearly everything that has come after has been based on feminist principles devised out of thin air. Even today, in the US there is no standard definition of what domestic violence is or is not. Yet thousands of men are incarcerated, families destroyed, and women and children thrown into a permanent condition of life in turmoil because of nothing but the aberrant personal beliefs of a few women a generation ago.
While the feminists of the 20th Century are dying off or retiring, their ugly legacy of opportunism remains. Legions of divorce lawyers, shelter advocates, and organizations providing feminist education all benefit from the multi-billion dollar industry that now forms the basis of society’s approach to partner abuse.
The real tragedy of Abusegate is that victims of genuine partner abuse are still left without hope and support. They have been doubly victimized by a society that has been too willing to accept answers without first considering the problem.
[/SIZE]
http://www.federalobserver.com/2010/01/24/schuett-abusegate-a-generation-deceived/
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Shuett is a men's rights activist. An MRA. I bet Tom wanks off to her...when he's not watching rape porn I guess.
Hilarious stuff. I am well aware of her "work". In the grand tradition of George W Bush and other radical righties, she employs Orwellian double speak. Calling herself a "Domestic violence advocate" with the clear implication that she advocates for the victims, while in fact, she is an advocate for men who beat women. Very few people have heard of her outside of the sadsacks like Tom who populate the men's rights movement. Men who are seething with bitterness because they can't get laid, their wife left them, their wife got sick of being slapped around and told the police...etc. Many are infuriated that after years of slapping their wife around she left them and the "unjust" court system awarded the poor woman alimony.
I always love when Tom exposes himself even further. The guy is a monster but each time he makes a post like this, one more person becomes aware of the fact.
Considering his posts it's rather ludicrous to believe he hasn't slapped his wife or ex-wife around, and that he hasn't committed rape. The man doesn't even know what consent is. And boy does he squeal when it's pointed out that his own words damn him and indicate he appears to be a rapist and woman beater.
But you know what they say...the one who squeals is the one you hit.
Hilarious stuff. I am well aware of her "work". In the grand tradition of George W Bush and other radical righties, she employs Orwellian double speak. Calling herself a "Domestic violence advocate" with the clear implication that she advocates for the victims, while in fact, she is an advocate for men who beat women. Very few people have heard of her outside of the sadsacks like Tom who populate the men's rights movement. Men who are seething with bitterness because they can't get laid, their wife left them, their wife got sick of being slapped around and told the police...etc. Many are infuriated that after years of slapping their wife around she left them and the "unjust" court system awarded the poor woman alimony.
I always love when Tom exposes himself even further. The guy is a monster but each time he makes a post like this, one more person becomes aware of the fact.
Considering his posts it's rather ludicrous to believe he hasn't slapped his wife or ex-wife around, and that he hasn't committed rape. The man doesn't even know what consent is. And boy does he squeal when it's pointed out that his own words damn him and indicate he appears to be a rapist and woman beater.
But you know what they say...the one who squeals is the one you hit.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
There is one thing about you anyway, you are consistent in your bullshit. It is as plain as day that you are a gender feminist and care little for equality. Men have rights too and it has been proven that women are every bit as abusive as men in domestic violence situations. Not that you would know it as it is yet another issue that people like you use to pursue your hate filled agenda.
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I actually love when tom shows off how much he hates women and indicates how much he seems to love raping and hitting them. It gives me pleasure because i love being right and each time he does it I get yet another PM from someone new telling me, shit you were right about Tom. And I just say "yep, I know I was".
Tom doesn't bother me. He's an old queen who doubtfully can even get it up to rape anyone.
What does bother me is that this monster raised two sons.
And then set them out upon the world.
And that's a shame. That surely is a shame. But ah well, I can't solve the world's problems and these sorts are a dime a dozen. I"ve plenty here in the states to worry about, what goes on in that shithole across the pond isn't much of a concern of mine.
Tom doesn't bother me. He's an old queen who doubtfully can even get it up to rape anyone.
What does bother me is that this monster raised two sons.
And then set them out upon the world.
And that's a shame. That surely is a shame. But ah well, I can't solve the world's problems and these sorts are a dime a dozen. I"ve plenty here in the states to worry about, what goes on in that shithole across the pond isn't much of a concern of mine.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Almost as consistent as you are with your daily rape posts and biweekly jerking off over beating women posts. Do you honestly believe there is one person here who doesn't know you for the monster you are? Even people you think don't Tom. That's what i Get to know. And it makes me smile.
Have a nice day. And if you see a woman walking alone...blow a whistle to attract attention so you're not...you know..tempted.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
If I don't bother you then you would just shut the fuck up, wouldn't you? It is obvious that you have your devoted acolytes, holy shit that prick Rune even fell on his sword for you!! You are also a practised liar as you have demonstrated on many occasions.
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
It's too much fun giving you a little poke and watching you explode your violent hate of women all over the place. A flaw in my otherwise sterling character to be sure.
AnglScarlett
New member
Yes no matter how fucked up your ideas or positions are on any issue you can always find some other ignorant bastard who is just as fucked up as you are on the web, and doesn't that make you feel so much better about being all fucked up? But to the rest of us, it still looks like you just found someone else who is just as fucked up as your are tommy, so don't think this is doing anything more than confirming how fucked up you are!