countryboy
Verified User
Lol, I was talking about you Junior.
And now the real circus will begin;
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Lol, I was talking about you Junior.
None of you can explain this: if the WH evidence shows a slam-dunk rebuttal of all accusations against trump, why wasn't the evidence produced much earlier? This all could have been avoided if the WH cooperated with Congress. Innocent people with exculpatory evidence would be desperate to get it out.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
But unfortunately, you spilled the beans on yourself.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
It is you Democrats wiping your ass with the Constitution, claiming you have the right to ignore the rest of the Constitution during an impeachment hearing.
We don't want your Human Feces maps, Needle strewn sidewalks, sanctuary for illegal foreigners, No borders and No immigration enforcement policies. Get it!?
many times n a criminal case the defendant will not testify/ it's a strategy.
Plus the administrations doesn't want to be subservient to a Congress -especially a hostile House
why should they cooperate? The Schiff show has blown up all on it's own
I'm not sure why anyone with slam-dunk evidence wouldn't have presented it at the outset and ended this process before it built up steam. What strategy is being used here, and why?
The WH shouldn't be subservient to Congress and vice versa. The three branches of govt. are equal.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
How is Trump supposed to have slam dunk evidence of something he didn’t do lol?
The only witness testimony on record is from the alleged victim and he claims the call was damn near perfect.
By the daily records of trump's schedule. If the Dems accuse trump of speaking to X at X hour, they could produce records showing he actually was speaking to Y at X hour, as one example.
The WH could come out and say that Volker, Sonland, Vindman, Hill, and all those who testified at the hearings were lying about trump and produce evidence of the lies.
The WH could explain why republicans never brought an investigation of Hunter Biden in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, but waited until Joe Biden announced his campaign in 2019 before getting outraged.
You get the picture, I hope.
Because they are Democrats. That is how they operate.
In America one is innocent until proven guilty. Dems (the accusers) have proven squat.
Maybe it will, maybe it won't Arsecheese. But what we do know is that this clown show ends in the Senate.Pelosi might be retiring next year as well.
Let me translate this bullshit for you Arsecheese; this is a partisan clown show where even some Democrats are embarrassed by it.
That is exactly how it will be remembered.
Disagree, and by the time the Senate white washes it thru in two weeks the other side will have their banner, already do with Mitch saying the GOP will work with the defense making it anything but a trial. To the independent voter, history by March
There were no witness because their were no crimes.
Calling these unhappy bureaucrats witnesses is an abuse of the English language and an insult to one's intelligence.
There is no evidence. Trump is not required to prove his innocence. The White House cannot be compelled by a Democratic Junta in the House to do anything but watch them make asses out of themselves. The Constitution; READ it.
Of course, low IQ buffoons like you will ignorantly parrot the lame, lie filled media talking points because you cannot think for yourselves.
There were no witness because their were no crimes.
Then why did they cry and whine so much about the Democrats not calling certain witnesses.
I am going to need a moron translator for this word salad Arsecheese.
Yes you can disagree with me; and you will always be wrong.
Ah, the House has passed health care measures, a huge drug prescription plan due next week, not thier fault Mitch shelves in his desk drawer, and yes, health care will be a biggie, much bigger than "ah, everybody is picking on Donny"
And forget the Constitution rant, the Constitution is a bumper sticker to conservatives, a cliche their demogogues love to throw around, and their actual understanding of it is even less
They didn't whine and cry; what's with all the lying? The correct question would be, why didn't Adam Schiff allow the Republicans to bring in their witnesses to the actual call to disprove the lie filled narrative Schiff was trying to promote?
Alas, this was a clown show. The Democratic Party of the Jackass is headed for a train wreck in 2020. They know it. This abuse of power exhibited by Nadler and Schiff, is a testimony to how weak their chances really are in 2020.
Bottom line, they may not even get the 20 votes they need to move this to the Senate. It will be interesting to see how willing those Democrats, at risk in districts that Trump won, are to go on the record for this train wreck.
Was Pelosi being a hypocrite, a liar or both in this video?
HYPOCRITE Pelosi on impeaching Clinton
Nah, just what he knows and why he called it a "drug deal," but Bolton is just one of many examples, Rudi would be great one under oath, along with Mulvaney or McGhan, the last thing Mitch wants is anyone one of those dragging the theater out
Another pile of lie filled bullshit Arsecheese. You're done.
Hardly, from the Preamble to the 27th Amendment, I've seen very few conservatives show an understanding of what lies within, of course we'll get the edited phrases they think makes their point, ones they've heard echoed endlessly, along with cherrypicked excerpts from the Federalist Papers, but thier insight to any of the Constitution doesn't extend much further than that