And now the real circus will begin;

This one is even worse when he doesn't have his Onion sources

The Senate is suppose to be based on an actual trial, the legal system, the House that of a Grand Jury, and as I said, if you want to bitch, yell at all those Jordan's, Meadows, Chavezs, Collins, Issas, and Nunes who established the House rules when they were in charge to conduct their umpteen "investigations," what goes around comes around, stop crying, your heroes set the rules

Now tell us Tucker Carlson thinks

are you a gutsy woman?
 
In America one is innocent until proven guilty. Dems (the accusers) have proven squat.

:rolleyes: Do you even understand what's going on here? I'm talking about the hearings, not a trial. I'm talking about fact-finding. The Dems had a number of witnesses testify under oath about what they knew re: Ukraine and the Bidens. Repubs are calling them liars but not bringing their own people to refute what the witnesses said. Repubs are standing by trump's big lying mouth and completely disregarding the facts. And I'm saying it's because they have squat to refute those people.
 
If a victim goes to court and says they weren't a victim, that's the end of the case. Zelensky was not a victim of anything.

If a victim knows that his/her attacker has the power over them to cause them harm, don't you think that they will claim that nothing happened? How many children who were molested feared to say anything because they were told that their abuser would hurt their parents? How many bullied kids are afraid to speak up? How many adults are victimized by scammers and remain silent out of shame?

Sometimes your stupidity knows no bounds, nor is there any lie so base that you won't repeat it if it's about someone you don't approve of. Putin is proud of you. Trump though? He doesn't know nor care that you even exist, yet here you are lying for the POS. Sad, you deplorables are.
 
:rolleyes: Do you even understand what's going on here? I'm talking about the hearings, not a trial. I'm talking about fact-finding. The Dems had a number of witnesses testify under oath about what they knew re: Ukraine and the Bidens. Repubs are calling them liars but not bringing their own people to refute what the witnesses said. Repubs are standing by trump's big lying mouth and completely disregarding the facts. And I'm saying it's because they have squat to refute those people.

You are stupid and get your news from Samantha Bee
 
:rolleyes: Do you even understand what's going on here? I'm talking about the hearings, not a trial. I'm talking about fact-finding. The Dems had a number of witnesses testify under oath about what they knew re: Ukraine and the Bidens. Repubs are calling them liars but not bringing their own people to refute what the witnesses said. Repubs are standing by trump's big lying mouth and completely disregarding the facts. And I'm saying it's because they have squat to refute those people.

There's no point in talking to the stupid wooden puppet. She believes in crazy shit like Trump is a great man and the world will end on a specific date and that she's doing God's work and so is TRE45ON.
 
You should mention circus, your a clown just like your masters in the Democrat party, and their Globalist masters, and their One World Government Masters!

Your standard bearer is enabling and proliferating an oligarch ruled society. Are you really that brain dead or just trolling for dollars?
 
Christifan did.
He produced the transcript. Trump & Zelensky said the call was fine.
Not our fault if the left never thought he'd release the call transcript. Surprise!!!! LOL :laugh:
None of ones the Dems trotted out (2nd & 3rd party types) in the circus trial said they heard anything impeachable.
Not out fault if the main guy...the wb...never showed up.
Get over it. The impeachment is about 'unable-to-get-over-it-itis'.

OMG. I never even used the word "proof" in my comments, let alone say that the Dems "proved" anything, you liar. I read all my comments twice to be sure. WTH is wrong with you that you can't argue this without lying?
 
There's no point in talking to the stupid wooden puppet. She believes in crazy shit like Trump is a great man and the world will end on a specific date and that she's doing God's work and so is TRE45ON.

Clearly she doesn't understand the difference between fact-finding and a trial. Plus she lied that I said the Dems "proved" trump was guilty, or some such nonsense.
 
Clearly she doesn't understand the difference between fact-finding and a trial. Plus she lied that I said the Dems "proved" trump was guilty, or some such nonsense.

Apparently lying is okay if it's in the service of one's master. Did you notice the post where I tried to explain the impeachment by using Obama as an example? The only rebuttal the bimbo could offer was a childish groan of impotence ala Earl. We're left to ponder the truth of the matter: Reichwingers do not give a rat's ass about the rule of law, presidential power over-reach, the Constitution, or this country -- unless the individual violating these long-held principles is not a Republican.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-real-circus-will-begin&p=3393398#post3393398
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in a jury trial isn't the jury suppose to be impartial till at least the proceedings begin?

this isn't a jury trial.......in fact, as we've been told for months, this is not a legal proceeding.......it is a political proceeding......thanks for playing, but your time to play is over.......
 
OMG. I never even used the word "proof" in my comments, let alone say that the Dems "proved" anything, you liar. I read all my comments twice to be sure. WTH is wrong with you that you can't argue this without lying?

When lies are all you have...

As for the false statement that "None of ones the Dems trotted out (2nd & 3rd party types) in the circus trial said they heard anything impeachable" -- that would be akin to a witness to a bank robbery being asked on the stand if she thought that the accused was guilty of armed robbery in the first degree. How would she know? She's a witness, not a prosecutor, an attorney, a cop, a jury member, or a judge. Just a witness. The fact that several of the impeachment witnesses testified because they knew that offering a foreign leader American goodies and a WH meeting with him in exchange for campaign dirt on a rival is wrong is enough. Well enough for sane ppl. Trumpanzees are obviously not sane ppl.
 
As I said, the real circus, but this one will be orchestrated by the White House and quickly recognized as another Trump production, the Democrats would love a Hannity "trial," but Mitch ain't letting that happen, the last thing he wants is a bitter Bolton under oath in front of a live TV audience

it won't be a Hannity trial........it won't be a NancyDance.......it won't be a SchiftyShow.....it will be whatever McConnel decides its going to be......of course, first the House has to vote for it........probably will never happen.....
 
Apparently lying is okay if it's in the service of one's master. Did you notice the post where I tried to explain the impeachment by using Obama as an example? The only rebuttal the bimbo could offer was a childish groan of impotence ala Earl. We're left to ponder the truth of the matter: Reichwingers do not give a rat's ass about the rule of law, presidential power over-reach, the Constitution, or this country -- unless the individual violating these long-held principles is not a Republican.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-real-circus-will-begin&p=3393398#post3393398

I did and that was a good example. We must be expecting too much of her and the other pod people lol.
 
there may be no circus at all, Moscow Mitch is working very hard to simply hold a floor vote, no testimony or anything remotely resembling an actual trial

you have a point.....there is no need to call Schiff, his staff and the whistleblower as witnesses in an impeachment hearing.......we can wait until Durham files an indictment against them and call them as witnesses in their own trials........
 
:rolleyes: Do you even understand what's going on here? I'm talking about the hearings, not a trial. I'm talking about fact-finding. The Dems had a number of witnesses testify under oath about what they knew re: Ukraine and the Bidens. Repubs are calling them liars but not bringing their own people to refute what the witnesses said. Repubs are standing by trump's big lying mouth and completely disregarding the facts. And I'm saying it's because they have squat to refute those people.

The fact was the transcript.
 
Back
Top