Absolute bombshell from WaPo this morning

FmCZlI0X0AIGZYZ



https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...lls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/

It’s true, Hillary got the majority of votes!
 
Below your link request idiot :palm:

Are all Democrats as helpless as you?


https://www.vox.com/2017/11/1/16593...k-advertising-money-election-president-russia

That amount of money was a Facebook claim and not a proven fact


From your link


Still, Facebook admitted Wednesday that as many as 146 million people in the U.S. may have seen a post or ad from an account with Russian ties on either Facebook or Instagram. Originally, the company estimated that just 10 million people had seen the 3,000 ads. Now we know over a hundred million more also saw the organic content posted from these same accounts.



Boy tha effective spending for Russia huh idiot



Russo bot holes are cheap to run huh
 
It’s not the money they spent



It’s the effectiveness of the money they spent


It’s how trump pulled off an electoral vote without the majority vote of Americans

He NEVER received the consent of the people idiot

He just used Russian help to massage the right level of idiots in just the right places to win without the peoples consent



12 cent an hour bot holes


The program was very effective
 
Again, how would this excuse Manaford and other top Trump campaign officials meeting with Russians to provide polling data? How is that not operating with Russians in the election?

Gawd almighty . Kilimnik was a State Dept asset -not "Russian intelligence"
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...port-linked-to-russia-was-a-state-department/
Kilimnik was not just any run-of-the-mill source, either.

He interacted with the chief political officer at the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, sometimes meeting several times a week to provide information on the Ukraine government. He relayed messages back to Ukraine’s leaders and delivered written reports to U.S. officials via emails that stretched on for thousands of words, the memos show.

The FBI knew all of this, well before the Mueller investigation concluded.

Alan Purcell, the chief political officer at the Kiev embassy from 2014 to 2017, told FBI agents that State officials, including senior embassy officials Alexander Kasanof and Eric Schultz, deemed Kilimnik to be such a valuable asset that they kept his name out of cables for fear he would be compromised by leaks to WikiLeaks.
 
The major concerns for the Vocal and Voting majority of voters in the midterms were REALITY, Democracy, Rule of Law, and Civil Discourse!

What candidates are best at dealing with reality?

Which candidates are best at trying to protect Democracy?

Which candidates are best at respecting the RULE OF LAW?

AND, which candidates are best at trying to keep things civil, while working to resolve all of our problems?
 
Exactly, never addressed

Nor does any of them explain why Junior, Paul, and Jared excitedly met with Russians in Trump Tower.
it's called opposition research.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45079377

They’ll say there was a conspiracy to get Trump based on a dozen phrases pulled out of five thousand plus text, or that Hunter did this or that based on big Bobby Bobulinski’s word, but the meeting is dismissed cause Junior just said it was over adoption
Mueller never charged Trump Jr. there was no collusion
The meeting was set up by" Kremlin-linked" lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya . she did it on false pretenses and Trump walked out

what's the problem?
 
Didn't you know 200K dollars of Russian Facebook ads won an election that Hillary spent over a billion dollars on. Russia always tries to screw around with our election. 200K would not even make a blip on the radar. Hillary paid a Russian millions for disinformation on Trump.
the USA does the same. you make a very good point about the scale of interference
 
it's called opposition research.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45079377

Mueller never charged Trump Jr. there was no collusion
The meeting was set up by" Kremlin-linked" lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya . she did it on false pretenses and Trump walked out

what's the problem?


Firm behind Trump dossier met with Russian lawyer involved in Trump Jr. meeting


One of the founders of the research firm behind the controversial Russian dossier met with a Kremlin-linked lawyer before and after she sat down with President Trump’s son and other campaign officials at the Trump Tower during the 2016 election..

Sounds like a set up to me.
 
The dossier, leaked by BuzzFeed News in January 2017,[13] without its author's permission,[14][15][16][17][18] is an unfinished 35-page compilation of raw intelligence[19][20] based on information from initially anonymous sources known to the author, counterintelligence specialist[21] Christopher Steele.[22]
 
Back
Top