Absolute bombshell from WaPo this morning

ziggy

Verified User
FmCZlI0X0AIGZYZ



https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...lls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/
 
How’s that a bombshell?

The algorithm was designed to motivate potential Trump supporters, no surprise, make sure they portrayed Clinton as Attila the Hun to insure they didn’t waver in support fro Trump with all the bombshells being dropped as the pussy tape

But regardless, it doesn’t excuse why Manafort and other top Trump campaign members meeting with Russians to exchange polling data
 
Russian collusion! Russian election interference! ( and other Russiaphobic fantasies)

Again, how would this excuse Manaford and other top Trump campaign officials meeting with Russians to provide polling data? How is that not operating with Russians in the election?
 
Russian collusion! Russian election interference! ( and other Russiaphobic fantasies)

If there was no Russian collusion, then why did Paul Manafort ask Konstantin Kilimnik to share confidential GOP polling data from the Midwest with Oleg Deripaska?

Not one of you Nazi clowns has been able to answer that question, and every single one of you avoid it at all costs.

Asked it of Matt Taibbi on Twitter and he blocked me with no explanation.
 
If there was no Russian collusion, then why did Paul Manafort ask Konstantin Kilimnik to share confidential GOP polling data from the Midwest with Oleg Deripaska?

Not one of you Nazi clowns has been able to answer that question, and every single one of you avoid it at all costs.

Asked it of Matt Taibbi on Twitter and he blocked me with no explanation.

Exactly, never addressed

Nor does any of them explain why Junior, Paul, and Jared excitedly met with Russians in Trump Tower. They’ll say there was a conspiracy to get Trump based on a dozen phrases pulled out of five thousand plus text, or that Hunter did this or that based on big Bobby Bobulinski’s word, but the meeting is dismissed cause Junior just said it was over adoption
 
Which still doesn’t address the legitimate question, how is this a bombshell? The authors didn’t say it was, the WP didn’t say it, only “ziggy” referred to it as a bombshell, so I repeat, how is this a bombshell?

Wow. You still don’t get it.
ziggy was being sarcastic.:palm:
 
Does this explain why Trump failed to get a majority of people’s votes in 2016 (or ever)?

Otoh …
“Nor does it address Russian hack-and-leak operations. Another major study in 2018 by University of Pennsylvania suggested those probably played a significant role in the 2016 race’s outcome.”

So :dunno:
 
Aaron J Shaffer did the research


He’s about 15 years old


Just joking


He’s a guy who looks 15 years Old

He’s not a researcher folks



He reports on the Middle East for the business section


It’s a crap report
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politico


Founded by American banker Robert Allbritton in 2007, it was acquired by Axel Springer SE, a German publisher in 2021. Axel Springer is Europe's largest newspaper publisher and had previously acquired Insider.

Ideologically, its coverage has been described as leaning towards a left-wing, or progressive, alignment.[6][7] However, as a subsidiary of Axel Springer, every employee at Politico is expected to advocate for Israel, a united Europe, "the trans-Atlantic alliance" and free-market points of view.[8][9][10][11][12]
 
Russian collusion! Russian election interference! ( and other Russiaphobic fantasies)
Didn't you know 200K dollars of Russian Facebook ads won an election that Hillary spent over a billion dollars on. Russia always tries to screw around with our election. 200K would not even make a blip on the radar. Hillary paid a Russian millions for disinformation on Trump.
 
Does this explain why Trump failed to get a majority of people’s votes in 2016 (or ever)?

Otoh …
“Nor does it address Russian hack-and-leak operations. Another major study in 2018 by University of Pennsylvania suggested those probably played a significant role in the 2016 race’s outcome.”

So :dunno:
The majority of voters did not vote for Hillary either.
 
Exactly, never addressed

Nor does any of them explain why Junior, Paul, and Jared excitedly met with Russians in Trump Tower. They’ll say there was a conspiracy to get Trump based on a dozen phrases pulled out of five thousand plus text, or that Hunter did this or that based on big Bobby Bobulinski’s word, but the meeting is dismissed cause Junior just said it was over adoption

And they will avoid it on this thread, despite the fact that I don't block anyone and they can read it.

Manafort handed polling data to Russians because he knew they would use it to interfere in the election, particularly in those upper midwest states that were targeted by Russia on Facebook.
 
Back
Top