Absolute bombshell from WaPo this morning

[PostmodernProphet]

This is a bombshell?

Too funny.

it is for those of you who still think they did......

 

[anatta]

Right, opposition research by going to the Russians for information, did you think the Russians did it out of the kindness of their heart

it's n o secret Moscow would have rather had Trump because Trump campaigned on improving US /Russian relations. My personal feeling is that was a great motivator for why the intelligence agencies all supported the fake Russian collusion narrative. but that's just my opinion

Mueller, who was incompetent as easily seen in his Congressional hearings, there was a reason he was picked, didn’t charge collision because he believed in Barr’s Imperial Presidency bullshit, and also, cause he felt they consciously didn’t know they were breaking the law, as I said, incompetent

Andrew Weissmann was the man behind the Mueller investigation -well known for prosecutorial abuse. I never bothered with Mueller for that reason, it was a set up hit job, and whatever obstruction innuendo there want any charges, and there full cooperation by Trump.
So how one gets to claim obstruction is is typical Weissman abuse

And as for what occurred at that meeting we only have Junior’s word, the same Junior who got caught lying about the meeting three times prior to its disclosure
No problem, I was just pointing out the Trump loyalists inability to explain the meeting

The Russia atty confirmed she was there to talk about adoptions

 

[Dutch Uncle]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmCZlI0X0AIGZYZ?format=jpg&name=small

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...lls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/

"But the study doesn’t go so far as to say that Russia had no influence on people who voted for President Donald Trump."

Interesting study. I do agree that such influence is limited. Especially among intelligent, educated people. The "poorly educated" dumbfucks, not so much. Those idiots will believe anything. LOL

 

[LV426]

Gawd almighty . Kilimnik was a State Dept asset -not "Russian intelligence".

If Kilimnik was a "state department asset" as Anatta says he was, then why didn't Kilimnik immediately inform on Manafort to the State Department after Manafort asked him to share confidential GOP polling data from the midwest with Deripaska in the spring of 2016?

These are questions none of the Russian assets like Anatta, Greenwald, or Taibbi bother to address because they are glaringly obvious tells that the Russian crew is chock full of liars.