7 dead in shootings at 3 massage parlors across metro Atlanta

I just read there is an eye witness who claims the guy yelled he wanted to kill all Asians, but it really doesn’t matter because with 8 murders, this guy will never see another day outside a maximum security prison.

True that. And you have to feel for Asian Americans right now.

My sister and her family aren't feeling all that safe nowadays with fearmongers telling them they are under attack, then this. Nothing has happened to her or her family (I asked, she's my sister), just vague stress from the news telling her that Asians are being attacked, then this happening too.
 
I never made the claim they invented it as a political tool, I stated they use it as a political tool. I listen to everyone, thanks for your concern. I agree with you, Asian Americans want to be heard, but their attacks have been (over 3800 of them) have been ignored by the press because the perpetrators were not white d00ds.

Interesting and telling assumption without basis.
 
Again, yes you will have to deal with them, there are many ways to attack people, some far more deadly than someone with a handgun, and those determined to do so may be crazy but can still find a way to get it done.

This is not an excuse.

Saying "well, it's going to happen anyway so we shouldn't do anything about it" is waving the white flag of surrender and sending the message that you're either too scared or not bright enough to come up with reasonable solutions.

No one is going to be able to kill hundreds of people in a matter of seconds, like the Vegas shooter, with any other means.

They can try bombs, but those aren't already really effective, and the ones who did use bombs were promptly caught, arrested, and prosecuted.

How many people die every year from bombs vs. how many die from guns?

What is the ratio?
 
The apparent motive was sexual. A spree killer getting "those girls back" that he paid for sex. He apparently thought, in his delusion, that he was fixing a sexual addiction by doing this.

HORSESHIT.

If this was about "sex addiction", then why didn't he shoot up any of the millions of strip clubs for which the city of Atlanta is famous.

In fact, there are two strip clubs literally 100 yards away from where those spas are.

So why didn't this guy target either of those strip clubs, they're right down the street?

He could walk to them from where he was.

He chose to attack the spas because of Trump and Christianity's insistence of tying COVID to anyone of Asian descent.

So if you ever used the "China Virus" phrase, you bear responsibility for what happened in Atlanta yesterday.
 
OK, so if people are the problem, not guns, then why do you want to give the problem guns?

Folks have rights, even if you don't like them. I think idiots voting are a problem too, but I know they have a right to vote.

Dealing with mental illness is dealing with the problem, taking away a fundamental and enumerated right is just tyranny. You may like feeling safe through tyranny, but I will always choose risk and freedom over the safety of fascism.
 
No inanimate object has ever been responsible for, or the cause of, the actions of a human.

LOL...

Hold on...let's not skip over the fact that you were completely fucking wrong about obesity in the impotent defense of giving people guns that you tried to make.

I want to circle back to that...so let's talk about it.

Let's talk about WHY you mistakenly and arrogantly tried to draw a comparison between gun violence, and an inherited genetic disorder that you thought wasn't.

Let's talk about how you came to make that argument, because I want to understand the level of contempt you have for honest debate.
 
Folks have rights\

But you JUST SAID that people are the problem.

So it would appear the excuse you have for gun violence runs in direct contradiction to your argument that people should be allowed to have guns.

You JUST SAID that people are the ones responsible for the gun violence.

So why do you want to proliferate gun violence by giving the ones responsible for that violence guns?
 
LOL...

Hold on...let's not skip over the fact that you were completely fucking wrong about obesity in the impotent defense of giving people guns that you tried to make.

I want to circle back to that...so let's talk about it.

Let's talk about WHY you mistakenly and arrogantly tried to draw a comparison between gun violence, and an inherited genetic disorder that you thought wasn't.

Let's talk about how you came to make that argument, because I want to understand the level of contempt you have for honest debate.

First: I wasn't completely wrong. Not all obesity is genetic, that's stupid. Some folks are addicted to food, others are eating due to trauma, etc. I simply used that inanity (the spoon) as an example where an inanimate object was in place of the gun in the idiotic statement you tried to pretend made sense. Guns are not the cause of the actions of any person. They are just a tool.

Also, I will never pretend that you are ever honest in any debate. Just wordy and disingenuous.
 
I think idiots voting are a problem too, but I know they have a right to vote.

No one has ever died from casting a vote.

You seem to want to blame people for gun violence, which is fine, but what's not fine is that you want to give people who commit gun violence, guns.

You say people are the cause of gun violence, then you say "let's give people guns".

Do you not see the cognitive dissonance there?
 
Dealing with mental illness is dealing with the problem

Mass murder is not a symptom of any mental illness.

But OK, let's go with this...

Where this leads is to mandatory, annual or semi-annual mental health evaluations.

So if you want to argue that mental health is the cause of gun violence, then the only way to combat that is to force every single gun owner to submit to a mental health examination. And they need to submit to that every year at least because mental illness can crop up at any time. So then it comes down to the doctor making the call as to whether or not you're allowed to own a gun. Now, I can suspect that isn't something you would support.

So once again, we have a situation where you cause something to be a problem, then refuse to do anything to solve that problem, instead complaining about it and crying crocodile tears.

So if you want to blame mental illness for mass shootings, then you have to support recurring, mandatory psych evals for every single gun owner in the US.
 
taking away a fundamental and enumerated right is just tyranny. .

But if you're blaming mental illness for mass shootings, then someone is going to have their "fundamental right" taken away because they can't pass a psych evaluation, which would be the only method by which we could determine who is mentally ill enough not to own a gun.

So by arguing this, you're actually arguing for MORE gun control by forcing every gun owner to submit to a mental health evaluation in order to prevent gun violence.

Are you prepared to support that???? I doubt it because you know that many people won't pass the psych eval and many people will lose this "fundamental right" because of you.
 
No one has ever died from casting a vote.

You seem to want to blame people for gun violence, which is fine, but what's not fine is that you want to give people who commit gun violence, guns.

You say people are the cause of gun violence, then you say "let's give people guns".

Do you not see the cognitive dissonance there?

That is flat incorrect. Hitler was duly elected by Parliament, and that Parliament was elected by voters who cast votes. Votes can be very dangerous, and harmful to society, jobs, livelihood. When Venezuela was taken over by a totalitarian regime through the election process, it was votes cast that caused that and the actions of the government to follow caused many deaths.

Anyway, you keep arguing that a right should be taken away, and if it isn't we should make laws infringing it "this way" that you think is beneficial. To do that you must first change the 2nd Amendment which tells me that the right of the people (means the same thing every time it is used in the constitution) to own and bear arms shall not be infringed. If you do not believe that you will be able to get that done, then this conversation is moot.
 
First: I wasn't completely wrong.

Yes you fucking were.

You very lazily and hastily tried to come up with some bullshit to derail the thread, but in doing so exposed just how reckless and undisciplined you are in your messaging.

I provided you the fucking link directly from the NIH that said obesity is an inherited disorder.

Apparently, you ignored that because you don't operate in good faith.
 
I just read there is an eye witness who claims the guy yelled he wanted to kill all Asians, but it really doesn’t matter because with 8 murders, this guy will never see another day outside a maximum security prison.

Agreed. Obviously he's a nutjob, but he could do everyone a favor by saving the courts money in convicting him and paying $30K/year to lock him up for another 50-60 years.
 
I simply used that inanity (the spoon) as an example where an inanimate object was in place of the gun in the idiotic statement you tried to pretend made sense.

It didn't make sense because the two are not similar.

There is no mental illness for which one of the symptoms is to plan a mass shooting.

So you tried to make a comparison, and it fell fucking flat because you don't really know that much about either of those two things.


Guns are not the cause of the actions of any person.

OK, so then why do you want to give people with the capacity for violence, guns???


Also, I will never pretend that you are ever honest in any debate.

You're the one who doesn't read links, because you operate in bad faith.

You're the one who makes bad comparisons, then refuses to own how bad they are.

You're the one who does that shit, not me.

You're the one who has issues with being honest, and it's pretty obvious why.
 
Back
Top