7 dead in shootings at 3 massage parlors across metro Atlanta

But killing what, you cannot be suggesting that we ban hunting rifles, shotguns, heck banning handguns would be near impossible, too many Liberals also own them.

I know we cannot ban guns in America. It would be a much safer and nicer place to live if we could. Many more guns than people make it impossible.
Hunting rifles could be forced to being put in gun cabinets.
Yes, I suggest banning every fucking one of them. They make America a nasty and dangerous place. Our kids get shooter drills. Can any American think that is acceptable?
 
I know we cannot ban guns in America. It would be a much safer and nicer place to live if we could. Many more guns than people make it impossible.
Hunting rifles could be forced to being put in gun cabinets.
Yes, I suggest banning every fucking one of them. They make America a nasty and dangerous place. Our kids get shooter drills. Can any American think that is acceptable?

I agree that banning firearms in the US would never happen, there are simply too many Americans that own them.
The problem is not really guns, in my opinion, something has gone wrong with society, guns were never a real issue when I was growing up, they were treated as tools and even the schools had shooting classes. No one ever considered shooting up a school or shopping mall so what has changed is us, and that is what we have to deal with.
Plus as I, and others, have said most gun violence is committed by people that had no legal right to own the firearm to begin with and if they use it for violence then they are not about to care about some gun law. Plus the fact that there are many Millions of firearms in society, those that own them legally are not going to turn them in, heck most would not even register them, so if you really cannot do anything about the firearms that would actually make a difference you have to deal with what is left, Criminals and those that have a Mental Illness that make them dangerous to those around them or themselves.
 
that's bullshit given your tribe calls anyone they disagree with racist all day and all night long, your ilk cheapened the very real issue of racism by using POC's as a bat and a weapon to attack others. So no, when you say you are not racist, it does not mean you are racist. The poster has a point, Attacks on asians has been on the rise since covid most of the perpetrators of these attacks have been african american and your media, and your tribe has remained silent. as soon as you find some white idiot doing something like this, suddenly its a story. The race of the attackers are never mentioned in the stories unless the attacker is white.


Don't you ever get resentful the media thinks you all are easy dupes?

The left did not invent racism as a political tool. You need to listen to minorities. Their experiences with racism are their own. They want it to stop. The fact that you refuse to listen to them is why most of them identify with the left.
 
No doubt. However, the initial and primary goal is to ensure one is not a danger to himself and others.

Which means identification and then assessment for treatment. That doesn't seem to be a focus of either party.
 
How could the police put that guy out as a spokesman for the shootings That cop had a facebook with anti-Asian crap on it. He was pushing jackets with a Covid brought to you by China. The cop actually said he was having a bad day, so he shot and killed Asian women and a couple of others who got in the way.
 
When you have to tell people you’re NOT a racists, there’s a good chance, you ARE a racists.



That's a tenet of Critical Race Theory (CRT), you stupid, goof-ball woman.


You wont' know what CRT is, so I'll have to explain to you how moronic it is like this...


A CRT believer (cult member) says that 2 + 2 doest equal anything in particular; it could be 3 or 5 or 7 or 11, and so on.


BUT if you dare say that 2 + 2 = 4, then you're an evil, White, racist, American/ (Western European) CUNT



Geddit, Ditzy ? Try to remember this before you vote Democrat at the next election.




Dachshund
 
Last edited:
almost all mass shooters look like incredibly wimpy losers who use their lethal guns as a penis-substitute to manifest their sexual identity.



So, Hoosier, I guess you're saying that if you were a mass shooter, your weapon of choice would be a Snub Nose .32 revolver , or maybe a "sawn-off" shot gun ? :)


Later, Hoosier


Dachshund
 
So, Hoosier, I guess you're saying that if you were a mass shooter, your weapon of choice would be a Snub Nose .32 revolver , or maybe a "sawn-off" shot gun ? :)


Later, Hoosier


Dachshund

no. nothing like that. i would never be a mass shooter, goon. you are projecting again, weiner boy.
 
He used a 9mm handgun, don't know what brand or model so do not know the capacity but even a revolver can do the same and reloaded in near the same amount of time. No, it is All about the Person, this one is obviously disturbed and needed help before he did something like this, but that is a much more complicated issue to deal with and it is far easier to blame a tool and ban it. Then what are we going to do blame knives and swords next when that is their weapon of choice? Fix the Real Problem and it is going to take a lot of work.

no, it is about banning a particular weapon that no individual needs to own. assault weapons with high cap mags. duh. i am not talking about this particular episode. i am talking about common sense gun regulations that MOST AMERICANS AGREE WITH, BUT THE NRA WILL NOT LET REPUBS VOTE FOR.

try to get a clue.
 
it is not about who obeys gun laws. it is about what kind of gun, and how lethal, and how easy to use, and how quickly it can kill so many, when ANYBODY for any reason snaps and decides to take out a whole bunch of other people with them. try to imagine we are arguing about if howitzers should be legal to private citizens, and then see how stupid that is although VERY VERY FEW WOULD EVER USE THEM TO KILL A BUNCH OF OTHER PEOPLE-----BUT THEY COULD IF THEY HAD ONE AND WENT NUTS.

Do you think for one minute a criminal will hesitate to use one of those weapons if it gives him the advantage? We have seen people use cars to take out a lot of people, do we ban those, obesity being what it is do we take forks away? We have idiots in Government with the ability to take out millions with the push of a button, many of those people would do it for an extra million dollars, regardless of how many it kills!
 
no, it is about banning a particular weapon that no individual needs to own. assault weapons with high cap mags. duh. i am not talking about this particular episode. i am talking about common sense gun regulations that MOST AMERICANS AGREE WITH, BUT THE NRA WILL NOT LET REPUBS VOTE FOR.

try to get a clue.

Most Americans do not support the ban. Rifles are more accurate that a hand gun!
 
actually, you are dead wrong. most people who were murdered knew their murderer- it was not connected to any other crime, or gang related activity....
crimes of passion, most of the time, and if a gun was not around, who knows if the murderer would have taken the time and effort to kill someone he knew in a more difficult, up close and personal way?

and we are just talking about murders--- what about all the accidental shootings of people and their family and friends? or how many use a gun for suicide, which makes it so much easier?

In 2017, 28.0 percent of homicide victims were killed by someone they knew other than family members (acquaintance, neighbor, friend, boyfriend, etc.), 12.3 percent were slain by family members, and 9.7 percent were killed by strangers. In 50% of the murders, the relationship was not known. (So of the murders where the relationship was known between victim and murderer, about 80% of the victims knew their murderer)

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/expanded-homicide



https://www.politifact.com/factchec...egal-gun-owners-commit-most-gun-crime-rep-fa/



right, the argument is those who are killed tend to be killed by an illegal gun, not a legal one.
 
The left did not invent racism as a political tool. You need to listen to minorities. Their experiences with racism are their own. They want it to stop. The fact that you refuse to listen to them is why most of them identify with the left.



I never made the claim they invented it as a political tool, I stated they use it as a political tool. I listen to everyone, thanks for your concern. I agree with you, Asian Americans want to be heard, but their attacks have been (over 3800 of them) have been ignored by the press because the perpetrators were not white d00ds.
 
Just have some balance - can we display ALL the blacks killing people - including by drug pushing. I am NOT racist but I do like balance.

So when anyone murders or harms anyone, we should post the pictures of all the people who have ever murdered or harmed anyone, or more to your point, if some white guy murders anyone, we should post the pictures of all black murders to take the onus off the white guy.

That’s mighty white of you. When did this become a rule because it has never been suggested when someone black is accused .. that we should post the pictures of all the white people so accused.
 
So when anyone murders or harms anyone, we should post the pictures of all the people who have ever murdered or harmed anyone, or more to your point, if some white guy murders anyone, we should post the pictures of all black murders to take the onus off the white guy.

That’s mighty white of you. When did this become a rule because it has never been suggested when someone black is accused .. that we should post the pictures of all the white people so accused.

is that what you think?? Good for you.
 
I never made the claim they invented it as a political tool, I stated they use it as a political tool. I listen to everyone, thanks for your concern. I agree with you, Asian Americans want to be heard, but their attacks have been (over 3800 of them) have been ignored by the press because the perpetrators were not white d00ds.

:palm: OBVIOUSLY you do not hate racism as much as you claim you do.
 
:palm: OBVIOUSLY you do not hate racism as much as you claim you do.



I disagree with you so I must like racism. come on d00d. act like an adult. I abhor racism, and fight against it. suggesting I am not offended by racism because I point out facts doesn't help. I am allowed my own opinions and if we don't agree it does not make me less anti racist than you.
 
How could the police put that guy out as a spokesman for the shootings That cop had a facebook with anti-Asian crap on it. He was pushing jackets with a Covid brought to you by China. The cop actually said he was having a bad day, so he shot and killed Asian women and a couple of others who got in the way.

how is acknowledging that the virus came from China anti-Asian?......that's like claiming saying soccer is popular in Brazil is anti-South American........
 
Do you think for one minute a criminal will hesitate to use one of those weapons if it gives him the advantage? We have seen people use cars to take out a lot of people, do we ban those, obesity being what it is do we take forks away? We have idiots in Government with the ability to take out millions with the push of a button, many of those people would do it for an extra million dollars, regardless of how many it kills!
how many times have you seen videos of students driving cars down the halls of their schools killing 20 classmates and teachers? or racist assholes driving their cars into black churches and killing as many as he can? or driving their cars in malls and mowing down people or in their offices?

if you look at the mug shots of the most prolific mass shooters, you see how there is no way they could have killed so many, so quickly, so easily, WITHOUT such a lethal weapon.

THAT IS THE POINT.
 
Back
Top