I have to laugh as these shrill dunces in the Party of the Lying Jackass and media demand people say the election was fair and Joe won.
We really are in third world shit hole territory here.![]()
They actually think they are going to get away with this!
I have to laugh as these shrill dunces in the Party of the Lying Jackass and media demand people say the election was fair and Joe won.
We really are in third world shit hole territory here.![]()
You should’ve watched, good evidence.
I believe there is evidence that…
1) Trump knowingly discusses with Eastman and others a plan to stay in office after his term expired knowing he wasn’t re-elected.
2) That Eastman and others took specific affirmative action to accomplish the fraud.
That’s the easiest one to prove.
Questioning the constitutionality is not fraud, I didn’t say that.
Your second statement is a lie.
So you didn’t hear the sworn testimony? That is evidence.
None of those things are required for there to be a crime.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is THAT why Trump vacated the office on Jan 20th a full TWO YEARS AGO????!?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! WHAT CRIME?????!? Are you REALLY going to go for this void argument fallacy AGAIN?????!?
The fraud was not accomplished
See the OP.
He screws everyone.
He's still screwing his fans and they're letting him do it.![]()
They all seem to enjoy it.
Eastman did not testify, Pence’s chief of staff did. You should have watched.
you know that isn't all that must be proved........stop lying.....I believe there is evidence that…
1) Trump knowingly discusses with Eastman and others a plan to stay in office after his term expired knowing he wasn’t re-elected.
2) That Eastman and others took specific affirmative action to accomplish the fraud.
That’s the easiest one to prove.
Attempt
no, cuntselor.....your opinion does not outweigh that of the courts.....it is not a lie......the NYT, NPR and CNN said it......the fact you are afraid to use the same words the court did does not change anything.......Your second statement is a lie.
So you didn’t hear the sworn testimony? That is evidence.
"If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor."
This seems to be the easiest statute to prove Trump violated. . .
If Trump knew or should have known he lost AND he conspired with one or more person and they took action to keep him in office, he has broken this criminal law.
bad news, cuntselor, but an actual conspiracy is in fact required for the crime of conspiracy....None of those things are required for there to be a crime.