Remove the Plank from thine own eye

ironic post is ironic....

it shows what a dishonest hack you are to claim i never write comments on point. my initial comments before dune insulted me, were right on topic. asking where is the hypocrisy is right on topic....but dune, of course only ad homed. but of course you don't have a problem with that. you ignore all off topic insults by your buddies zappa and dune. quite the double standard and you sometimes even thank them for their posts.

Your personal remark contributions to the thread:

#2 you're so partisan. where is the hypocrisy? i bet you just read the comments and jumped for joy because someone else said there was hypocrisy.

#8 uh huh...which why you can't even say what the hypocrisy is....nor can rana who thanked yoru post.

#14 still can't explain the hypocrisy...you claim i'm stupid because i can't see it, yet it is so "simple" you can't even explain it, nor can rana.

#17 what a pansy...still butt hurt over the other thread...grow up

#20 translation: yurt is right, there is no hypocrisy, so i will act like an asshole so rana will thank me.

#27 no surprise zappy comes to dune's rescue and insults rather than debate. you two are cowards. there is no hypocrisy so dune has to whine about some thread that is almost 2 months old so he can avoid explaining how i'm stupid for not seeing the hypocrisy. hilarious.

#33 face it rana you're timid, for some reason you love to get into insult spats with others, but refuse to debate me in any subject.

#39 it shows what a dishonest hack you are to claim i never write comments on point, etc.
 
christie.....solely on point...

care to address the topic?

Yes. Can we cut off his gov't. salary because he was driving drunk?

This man "...is a sponsor of a bill that would implement random yearly drug testing for welfare recipients. According to the bill, anyone who failed such test would be cut off from public assistance. In response to this proposal, Democratic state Rep. Scott Holcomb submitted legislation that would instead require all state lawmakers to undergo random drug testing."
 
Yes. Can we cut off his gov't. salary because he was driving drunk?

This man "...is a sponsor of a bill that would implement random yearly drug testing for welfare recipients. According to the bill, anyone who failed such test would be cut off from public assistance. In response to this proposal, Democratic state Rep. Scott Holcomb submitted legislation that would instead require all state lawmakers to undergo random drug testing."

drug testing and drinking are the same? he does not support denying benefits for a DUI, rather, for using illegal substances.
 
Just because you are too stupid to see it doesn't mean it is not there.

That's it...provide a "translation" so you don't have to respond to the points he made and the question he asked.

Once again Yurt dodges questions put to him...while still demanding others answer his questions.

here are just two attacks by her lefty friends that christie ignores.....but oh no....must attack yurt for making comments off topic, then she actually makes comments off topic and ignores her lefty friends doing the same.

:rolleyes:
 
Of course he doesn't...because he, like you, is just another "do as I say and not as I do" Rightie.

will rana call this post out?

explain how anything i've said could you lead you to believe i'm a do as a i say and not as i do "rightie"? further, is it your contention that no "lefties" are like this?
 
yes he is. that doesn't make anything in the OP hypocritical.

Do try to follow along...

If he's singling out one small group of people who break the law and not applying the rules to EVERYONE, then he's a hypocrite.

See how easy that was?
 
Do try to follow along...

If he's singling out one small group of people who break the law and not applying the rules to EVERYONE, then he's a hypocrite.

See how easy that was?

you're confusing bias with hypocrisy. had he said those with a DUI conviction canot get benefits, then yes, he would be a hypocrite. being against certain drugs and not others is not hypocrisy, it is simply bias. i suggest you look up hypocrisy.

he simply for the belief that those who do illegal drugs, should not recieve benefits. he is not saying those who break any law should not recieve benefits. thus, there is no hypocrisy.
 
you're confusing bias with hypocrisy. had he said those with a DUI conviction canot get benefits, then yes, he would be a hypocrite. being against certain drugs and not others is not hypocrisy, it is simply bias. i suggest you look up hypocrisy.

he simply for the belief that those who do illegal drugs, should not recieve benefits. he is not saying those who break any law should not recieve benefits. thus, there is no hypocrisy.

Wut?
 
let me help dune understand the concept:

X is against marijuana being legal, however, X is for alcohol being legal. this is not hypocrisy, as the two drugs are not the same. it is, however, ignorant bias as to marijuana.

i hope that clears things up.
 
Back
Top