No, says the confessions and creeds of the Christian faith, as debated since the earliest church.
No, says a certain church that you adhere to. Not the "Christian faith."
No, says the confessions and creeds of the Christian faith, as debated since the earliest church.
Protestants are Christian's, if they, adhere to the Christian doctrines of the OT and the NT.
No, says a certain church that you adhere to. Not the "Christian faith."
And who are you to proclaim what the "Word of God" is, or what text defines it? Texts were written by man.
Wrong again Oncie...so says the Christian Church since its beginning.
Like I said, you have to go to extremes. And again - I didn't say they couldn't call themselves Christians.
Sorry about that. I know it really disrupts the big "gotcha" moment.
They were denounced as heretics by "the church" years ago. Do you think "the church" was correct?
is someone who worships the devil a christian? why would you need to put them under scrutiny if you did not doubt they were christians?
why are so afraid of answering these two simple questions?
And who are you to proclaim what the "Word of God" is, or what text defines it? Texts were written by man.
This thread has become stupid.
This thread was started to discuss the rights (and wrongs) of Palestines claim for nationhood.
There can be no logical argument against the proposal. Palestine, its history not withstanding, is a societal entity - just like America. It exists and behaves as an entity - just like America. If the people who live in America consider themselves a nation then, obviously the people of Palestine deserve the same. One thing is for sure, the strident and ignorant voices of the American south have absolutely no claim on the decision or its outcome.
But not Christ. Again, if you put 100% faith in what "the church" says, you thought Protestants were heretics. Until "the church" said they were not.
Still going for the gotcha, eh?
If someone worships the devil, they're probably not a Christian. But if they claim to be, I won't say they're not. And I haven't said they're not - even though that's what you have repeatedly said that I said.
I'd love for you to find where I said they're not Christian.
weak tapdance, very weak, even for you.
you won't say they aren't, but they probably aren't, and you want them to undergo scrutiny, but no, that is nothing like dixie saying they are not.
carry on with your dishonest tap dancing....
Uhm. ... right here, idiot?
There are plenty of Christians who don't believe every single word of the Bible.
Then they aren't christians.
Are you now going to tell me that there is a difference between being a literalist and believing every word?
You do realize that Muhammad was a direct descendant of Abraham... Jesus was not.
YES! I AM TELLING YOU THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "BELIEVING" EVERY WORD, AND BELIEVING EVERY WORD "LITERALLY" AS IS WRITTEN. TWO COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS! CAN I MAKE THIS ANY CLEARER FOR YOUR RETARDED ASS?
But the Muslims made their claims centuries after Christianity was formed. As I said, the religion itself was created to oppose (and destroy) Christianity and Judaism, and has always held that motivation. Yes, the claims of Christians is much different, as is the history surrounding their claims. Whereas the Christians have legitimate historical basis for what they claim, the Muslims do not. The Muslims also lack credibility because they believe in Taqiyya.
Look... we're having a bit of a comprehension problem with you here... IF I make a statement as to what the Bible says, that doesn't mean I am making a statement that's what I believe. If I make a statement as to what Christians believe, that doesn't mean this is what I personally believe. You keep wanting to take what I am saying in the context of someone arguing FOR Christian beliefs, and I have not done that. Repeatedly, in this thread, I have clarified that mine is not a 'theological' debate, and I still maintain that. You can try and rope me into such a debate, by parsing my words or manipulating the context, but I have repeatedly told you and others, I am not here to debate Christian theology, just to set the record straight on the facts pertaining to it.
translation:
only yurt is a hypocrite, but muhammad and any muslim who believes exactly like yurt (except to the jews) are not bigots
truly stupid superfreak. you could have just admitted you fucked up and been done with this. you didn't prove how i was bigoted, i gave you the definition and you still can't explain how the belief meets the definition. your refusal to hold muhammad and muslims to the same standard proves you're intellectually dishonest.
carry on.
Quran 2:59
But those who wronged changed [those words] to a statement other than that which had been said to them, so We sent down upon those who wronged a punishment from the sky because they were defiantly disobeying.
A bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from their own or intolerant of people of different political views, ethnicity, race, class, religion, profession, sexuality or gender.
If you don't believe in the Bible, you are not a Christian. Sorry, that's just common fucking sense.
Deuteronomy 4:2 Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you.
Deuteronomy 12:32 See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it.
Proverbs 30:6 Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
Rev. 22:18-19 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
You simply CAN'T believe certain PARTS of the Bible and NOT believe others!