So its only the right: Democrat Harry Mitchell Places Opponent in Crosshairs

and this isn't just over a district, like a bullseye, this is clearly a gun scope aimed at his opponents head

unless someone can show this was doctored, should we examine this in order to better understand the shooter?
 
Rana said:
or not, it is really okay if he doesn't!
Click to expand...

tff...once again, you're calling out a righty, but leaving all the threads where your lefties are "discussing" alone...you don't call them out, because in truth you really don't mind them doing it because it furthers your political agenda
 
It is what reasonable people think, that is wrong to be done, period, both sides, no excuses.
 
christiefan915 said:
Actually, I found a longer ad that shows it much more clearly. It was wrong, wrong, wrong.

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epdJWNA65oY&feature=youtu.be

Happy? :D
Click to expand...

your link doesn't work....link again

but i can see how giddy you are that you think you're right, you will expend much effort to show the left does not have violent rhetoric, but will expend virtually zero effort to condemn the actual violent rhetoric

how does that make you feel?
 
Yurt said:
tff...once again, you're calling out a righty, but leaving all the threads where your lefties are "discussing" alone...you don't call them out, because in truth you really don't mind them doing it because it furthers your political agenda
Click to expand...

For two days you've been all over this board like a chicken with its head cut off, trying to deflect from the use of violent imagery. Out of dozens of comments, you made two tepid posts saying you disagreed with the images:

i don't agree with her imagery...
i never ignored it, when the poster first came out i was against it

I guess this is your CYA tactic, pre-emptively giving yourself a pass while continuing the lie of saying libs are blaming Palin. We didn't say anything different than you did but for us the comments mean blaming Palin, for you they mean exactly what you wrote.

The fact is that the topic of using violent graphics has been all over the media since the shooting happened, but you prefer to ignore that, because it doesn't quite fit with your tiresome theory of "calling out" the other side.
 
christiefan915 said:
For two days you've been all over this board like a chicken with its head cut off, trying to deflect from the use of violent imagery. Out of dozens of comments, you made two tepid posts saying you disagreed with the images:

i don't agree with her imagery...
i never ignored it, when the poster first came out i was against it

I guess this is your CYA tactic, pre-emptively giving yourself a pass while continuing the lie of saying libs are blaming Palin. We didn't say anything different than you did but for us the comments mean blaming Palin, for you they mean exactly what you wrote.

The fact is that the topic of using violent graphics has been all over the media since the shooting happened, but you prefer to ignore that, because it doesn't quite fit with your tiresome theory of "calling out" the other side.
Click to expand...

so you have me calling out palin, and apparently my saying i don't agree with two times isn't good enough, would you prefer 10? 20? you haven't once specifically called out any of the left wing talk i've presented, not once. you of course dishonestly fail to mention calling out webbway and dixie....keep trying to deflect this on me christie, but the facts are clear, you're the one running around with your head cut off desperately trying to connet palin and whoever else on the right to this shooting....

see, this is your problem, you don't give a shit about left wing rhetoric, you haven't specifically called out any one person, and when given the chance, you attack me instead. that says alot about you christie, you care more for attacking your political opponents than being honest and addressing the fact that both sides have their wackos.

everytime someone presents left wing violent rhetoric, instead of being concerned like you claim to be when its from the right, instead of wanting to analyze it like you do when it comes from the right..... you attack the person posting the information, what you don't do, is attack the violent rhetoric from the left wing wacko, nor do you consider a factor.

why is that?

edit....and again, your link doesn't work...care to try again?
 
Yurt said:
so you have me calling out palin, and apparently my saying i don't agree with two times isn't good enough, would you prefer 10? 20? you haven't once specifically called out any of the left wing talk i've presented, not once. you of course dishonestly fail to mention calling out webbway and dixie....keep trying to deflect this on me christie, but the facts are clear, you're the one running around with your head cut off desperately trying to connet palin and whoever else on the right to this shooting....

see, this is your problem, you don't give a shit about left wing rhetoric, you haven't specifically called out any one person, and when given the chance, you attack me instead. that says alot about you christie, you care more for attacking your political opponents than being honest and addressing the fact that both sides have their wackos.

everytime someone presents left wing violent rhetoric, instead of being concerned like you claim to be when its from the right, instead of wanting to analyze it like you do when it comes from the right..... you attack the person posting the information, what you don't do, is attack the violent rhetoric from the left wing wacko, nor do you consider a factor.

why is that?
Click to expand...

What left wing violent rhetoric is currently being spoken? I'm not talking about the bush years. Give me something to go by Yurt, in fact, make up a check list so I can criticize them all in one fell swoop.

It is WRONG to use violent rhetoric in political arena no matter whether by DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS.

Now, do you accept this or are you going to move the goal posts again?
 
Wow...another thread looking to blame the left?

This has turned you into some sort of super-hack; a hack among hacks. I'm very impressed, Yurtsie; you have thrown away all pretense, finally...
 
christiefan915 said:
What left wing violent rhetoric is currently being spoken? I'm not talking about the bush years. Give me something to go by Yurt, in fact, make up a check list so I can criticize them all in one fell swoop.

It is WRONG to use violent rhetoric in political arena no matter whether by DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS.

Now, do you accept this or are you going to move the goal posts again?
Click to expand...

oh i see....it no longer matters and you no longer have to be upset about it because it happened in the past

everything you've cited except palin's poster is from the past, someone even pulled up a dixie quote from a year ago and you certainly didn't jump in and proclaim it is not relevent because it happened a year ago

oh no, time is only a factor if its the left

when you start actually calling people out, acting concerned about leftwing rhetoric like you're so concerned about right wing rhetoric, then you might have something, all you have now are empty words

when you enter a thread that details left wing violent rhetoric and only attack me, it says alot about your priorities and you're once again DEFENDING at worst or at best MINIMIZING the left wing rhetoric by saying it happen during bush years

can't you see how fucking stupid that is? oh, we must only analyze right wing rhetoric in order to understand the shooter, but we don't need to consider left wing rhetoric at all because it supposedly isn't occuring now

i hope you change your mind
 
Onceler said:
Wow...another thread looking to blame the left?

This has turned you into some sort of super-hack; a hack among hacks. I'm very impressed, Yurtsie; you have thrown away all pretense, finally...
Click to expand...
Unbelievable. Pointing out another's hypocrisy is not "hack", it is simply pointing out the hypocrisy.
 
christiefan915 said:
That's exactly what I posted. Read the URL. Are you drunk?
Click to expand...

your link deos not work like i told you multiple times, perhaps you are projecting again and the crosshairs are clearly still there, you said there weren't

wrong, wrong, wrong....you said

yet unfortunately for you, you're wrong
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top