The hits just keep on comin'

Onceler said:
""I don't "get it" because what I am reading, Rush isn't attributing the entire economy to Obama, just the recession, because of the tanking markets... which is basically what I said as well" - Dixie.
Click to expand...

Right, I commented on what RUSH said. I never attributed the recession to Obama, he did contribute to it though. Rush attributed the recession to Obama because the tanking of the markets, I attributed the tanking of the markets to Obama. I know that is confusing for you, but that's why you should stick to what people actually POST rather than making up shit they didn't.
 
Dixie said:
Right, I commented on what RUSH said. I never attributed the recession to Obama, he did contribute to it though. Rush attributed the recession to Obama because the tanking of the markets, I attributed the tanking of the markets to Obama. I know that is confusing for you, but that's why you should stick to what people actually POST rather than making up shit they didn't.
Click to expand...

LOL

You're kidding, right?

It's so weird to put words in front of you that clearly mean something, and watching you spin otherwise.

"I wasn't trying to disrupt the board...I was just trying to make the threads harder to read!"
 
Onceler said:
LOL

You're kidding, right?

It's so weird to put words in front of you that clearly mean something, and watching you spin otherwise.

"I wasn't trying to disrupt the board...I was just trying to make the threads harder to read!"
Click to expand...

Not kidding, not spinning, I didn't say what you claimed I said. Sorry! Wish I could help you out, I know you lead a pathetic life and need to be right about something, but I suggest you start by being honest and admitting your faults.
 
Onceler said:
You said "no one."

Not only was it not "no one," it was a guy who was called a Kingmaker for the GOP in '94 and invited to Washington for inauguration week, who routinely speaks at GOP events and who boasts over 20 million listeners consistently for 2 decades. He is perhaps the most influential conservative voice of this generation, and that is fairly hard to dispute.
Click to expand...

and once again, you said A - singular - republican....it is so easy to point out your obvious intellectual dishonesty....

i said palin....yet palin is not good enough....many call her something akin to rush, she has her own show, some believe her endorsements get people elected...

both are famous and vocal voices for the gop, yet neither holds a position of power....however....at least palin has held office and ran for office, whereas rush hasn't...

so you see...your distinction is a lie and an attempt to not claim you're wrong....if you were honest you would have found a republican in office....you know when you asked it of me, i didn't give you this moronic dishonest spin you're giving me, instead i stuck to the discussion and gave you a name

that is because i am not afraid to debate, you are....you only love to lie and twist people's words and then claim victory
 
Yurt said:
what a liar...first it was A republican or any republican and then you switched it to a republican in power because i gave you palin

how do you live with yourself? its ok for you to use a republican not in power, but not for others
Click to expand...
They all do it Y....and all the time....
Get their feet stuck in their mouths and have to change a word here and their in a desperate attempt to save face....
You do have to point it out because some other posters just miss these subtle, pathetic tactics...:good4u:

TC the pinhead does it regularly too
 
Yurt said:
and once again, you said A - singular - republican....it is so easy to point out your obvious intellectual dishonesty....

i said palin....yet palin is not good enough....many call her something akin to rush, she has her own show, some believe her endorsements get people elected...

both are famous and vocal voices for the gop, yet neither holds a position of power....however....at least palin has held office and ran for office, whereas rush hasn't...

so you see...your distinction is a lie and an attempt to not claim you're wrong....if you were honest you would have found a republican in office....you know when you asked it of me, i didn't give you this moronic dishonest spin you're giving me, instead i stuck to the discussion and gave you a name

that is because i am not afraid to debate, you are....you only love to lie and twist people's words and then claim victory
Click to expand...

I've gotta say - it's still fascinating to me that you're not getting this, at all.

I'm talking about the CONTEXT of the discussion. Again - it's very easy for hacks to criticize Republicans out of power. That's why the distinction was important in that discussion, and why I brought it up.

It's ludicrous to assume the "new standard" was that every single quote regarding every issue that is being debated on the board now requires an "establishment" politician. It applied in the Palin case because once again, it's very easy for hacks to criticize people out of power....
 
Onceler said:
Translation: I know Onceler is right, and I don't have the energy to keep ignoring his point & trying to distract from it...
Click to expand...

What we don't have the energy (or time) to do, is to continue talking to a lying idiot who isn't making any sense. You've gone on for 3 days now, not proving your point, resorting to creating quotes out of thin air, and pretending to deflect every effort to show you how totally wrong you are. At first it was amusing, then it became annoying, now it's just pathetic. Get a life!
 
Dixie said:
What we don't have the energy (or time) to do, is to continue talking to a lying idiot who isn't making any sense. You've gone on for 3 days now, not proving your point, resorting to creating quotes out of thin air, and pretending to deflect every effort to show you how totally wrong you are. At first it was amusing, then it became annoying, now it's just pathetic. Get a life!
Click to expand...

exactly
 
Onceler said:
Translation: I know Onceler is right, and I don't have the energy to keep ignoring his point & trying to distract from it...
Click to expand...

Translation: Thank God that I was finally able to spin this so that my original asinine comment has been overlooked.
 
Again - and I can't believe the level to which I have to crouch to explain this - the IDEA is that someone is responsible for the economy before they TAKE OFFICE.

This is pretty unbelievable. First, you kept asking for "entire economy;" now, someone points out "fixed" and you're obsessed with that.

Any life preserver will do, I suppose....
 
Onceler said:
Again - and I can't believe the level to which I have to crouch to explain this - the IDEA is that someone is responsible for the economy before they TAKE OFFICE.

This is pretty unbelievable. First, you kept asking for "entire economy;" now, someone points out "fixed" and you're obsessed with that.

Any life preserver will do, I suppose....
Click to expand...

"now" somone points out fixed...lol...what a liar...YOU are the one who said fix first...i then said no one said he could fix the economy before he took office and then you laughed and said "really...no one"...

good lord, seriously, how can you tell such bald face lies, your words are right there...
 
Yurt said:
"now" somone points out fixed...lol...what a liar...YOU are the one who said fix first...i then said no one said he could fix the economy before he took office and then you laughed and said "really...no one"...

good lord, seriously, how can you tell such bald face lies, your words are right there...
Click to expand...

You didn't make hay about fixed for ages. It was "entire economy" for many posts, and then Dixie's whole sidetrack w/ not affecting the economy, but causing the recession.

Like I said on the other thread, it hardly matters. You're missing the entire point, in such a significant way - it's pretty staggering, actually. I've explained it as well as I'm able, but you haven't even shown a flicker of understanding...
 
Onceler said:
You didn't make hay about fixed for ages. It was "entire economy" for many posts, and then Dixie's whole sidetrack w/ not affecting the economy, but causing the recession.

Like I said on the other thread, it hardly matters. You're missing the entire point, in such a significant way - it's pretty staggering, actually. I've explained it as well as I'm able, but you haven't even shown a flicker of understanding...
Click to expand...

yeah, i allowed you to distract me...

why are you now running away from you claim about him fixing the economy? oh wait....i already know the answer, because you're wrong and since you never admit you're wrong you will lie and twist things to such a pathetic position so you don't have to admit you fucked up in claiming people said obama could fix the economy before he took office

this really pathetic onceler
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top