Monad Portal
Was it me?
yes he did.He never did.
It never replaced any other law.
whole of the law means replace.
yes he did.He never did.
It never replaced any other law.
my god endorses the golden rule.And according to Christians, objective morality comes from their God... even though their God endorses, and ignores, clearly immoral behavior.
there is morality and it is objective.There is no such thing as 'objective morality'. There is just 'morality'. For Christians, their morality comes from the Bible and their own relationship with God.
For you, your morality comes from your religions as well.
Void argument fallacy. Your morals are not the same as Christian morals. Buzzword fallacy.
Because enslaving free people is clearly wrong, hence the world moved on to a reality that your God missed.Why would the 10 Commandments (ageless moral law) have anything to do with a specific age's societal view of slavery?
How about a tsunami that you created?Save a child from what?
Nope. You selective morality comes from the Bible and it changes as society's view of morality changes.There is no such thing as 'objective morality'. There is just 'morality'. For Christians, their morality comes from the Bible and their own relationship with God.
For you, your morality comes from your religions as well.
the golden rule covers slavery.Because enslaving free people is clearly wrong, hence the world moved on to a reality that your God missed.
There is between the OT and NT and today.There is nothing inconsistent about the gospel, or about God. Go learn what 'fact' means.
That it was. I submit that like so many times before, the Israelites forgot the purpose of the commandment, and even often forgot the commandment completely.Yes, violating the Sabbath was a very serious offense during the days of "ancient Israel". So?
It still carries serious consequences. By ignoring the council of God, you ignore the benefit you obtain from following it. In some cases, this can result in permanent self induced damage to yourself.Yes, violating God's design for marriage was a very serious offense during the days of "ancient Israel". So?
The Ten Commandments are not a sin at all. They are good solid council.Nope.
The 10 Commandments aren't an exhaustive list of sins.
"Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall" (Proverbs 16:18)
"When pride cometh, then cometh shame: but with the lowly is wisdom"
(Proverbs 11:2)
Inversion fallacy.Incoherent babbling.
There is nothing inconsistent about God or the gospel between the Old Testament and the New Testament.There is between the OT and NT and today.
the NT supercedes the OT.There is between the OT and NT and today.
Science does not explain why lightning happens. It only explains it's behavior.Nope, it is a fact that man has invoked extraterrestrial beings to explain what he doesn't understand and/or is afraid of. The track record of those things being explained by science is 100% so far.
No. Your beliefs are based on your religions. You are a fundamentalist in several religions.My beliefs and "guess" is based on that objective track record.
So you withdraw your 1st commandment.Go learn English.
RQAAOh, so not abusing children doesn't make the list for your God, but he needs 3 commandments talking about himself?
Nothing.What happened to being humble?
Answer the questions. You have already chosen to withdraw your 1st commandment. You provided originally only two, not ten.Again, I made the 10 Commandments better in less than 5 minutes.
Apparently you can't count.Less than 30 seconds, actually. If I had a keyboard, it would have been 10 seconds
No, it hasn't. Slavery still exists today, even in the United States.Because enslaving free people is clearly wrong, hence the world moved on to a reality that your God missed.
I don't create tsunamis.How about a tsunami that you created?
It was never the only law. The golden rule does not replace any law.yes he did.
whole of the law means replace.
That's a good thing!my god endorses the golden rule.
There is no such thing as 'objective morality'. It is simply 'morality'.there is morality and it is objective.
Mutually beneficial? This is a void argument. What about the resources you mutually benefit from that others can no longer benefit from (since the resource was consumed)?.morality is the set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative and mutually beneficial relationships.
. Once again playing dumb.I don't create tsunamis.