I am new but not new?

Yes! @Evan Keal ,I think it's only fair you know up front, when conversing with Ross or who I call Corn Pop you're dealing with a two-time letter to the editor writer, I think it was Newsweek that published his work like thirty years ago. He thought it was important to let me know that so I'm just helping out. I'm really nice that way.
Interesting. What was the title of the letter to the editor and what year and what was it about and did it get published? I looked but can't find it. I guess I'm not looking in the right places.
 
Interesting. What was the title of the letter to the editor and what year and what was it about and did it get published? I looked but can't find it. I guess I'm not looking in the right places.
I have Tobytone on IGNORE, so I cannot read what he wrote, but from the tone of your question, I suspect it was about me. (I own Tobytone and it makes him upset) In any case, if he brought up anything you want to ask about, just ask me and I will answer it in a way that you can check.
 
Interesting. What was the title of the letter to the editor and what year and what was it about and did it get published? I looked but can't find it. I guess I'm not looking in the right places.
Lol, that's more than I did. You'll have to ask him, he actually started out telling me two letters to the editor and then it grew to over 200 published in other publications I presume. He might get touchy if you approach the subject so go in easy and act impressed if you really want to know.
 
I have Tobytone on IGNORE, so I cannot read what he wrote, but from the tone of your question, I suspect it was about me. (I own Tobytone and it makes him upset) In any case, if he brought up anything you want to ask about, just ask me and I will answer it in a way that you can check.
Just curious about your work and wanted to know where I could go to read it.
 
Just curious about your work and wanted to know where I could go to read it.
You can read it right here in JPP.

In one of my earlier posts I was making a point about the nature of Internet postings. Quite honestly, I think they suck.

I mentioned that before the Internet opened its doors to opinions, one had to write an opinion which met the standards and expectations of editors of newspapers and magazines across the nation. I mentioned that I often wrote opinions that were published...and each opinion published, like the opinions of all others, was accompanied by my verified name...and the town in which I lived. It was, and still is, my contention that the reason for the kinds of posts that appear on the Internet, is because they are totally anonymous. A person can say anything he/she wants and do it from behind a closed door, so to speak.

I also mentioned that I wrote MANY op ed and letters-to-the-editor opinion pieces. My guess would be over 200...published in newspapers across the US...and in England. My successes were a source of pride for me...back then just getting a letter published was an accomplishment. I had dozens published in places like the NY Times, an op ed sized letter taking on the opinion of former Times editor A. M. Rosenthal on drugs. I got a MY TURN published in Newsweek Magazine (paid me $1000 for that). Not an easy thing to do. When Lloyd Bentsen debated Dan Quayle in a heated exchange before the 1988 election...the national magazines were inundated with opinion letters. Not only did I get one selected for publication by Newsweek...I also got one selected by Time Magazine...both national magazines publishing a letter from me from among 800 to 900 letters received by each.

Lots of pride involved there.

If you would like the dates of each publication...I'll be glad to furnish them. Just ask and I will PM you the information.

Tobytone is an asshole...who is bothered by me. He also took a comment I made that I served a drink to Frank Sinatra at a party in the Hamptons...to "He claims he is the personal bartender to Frank Sinatra."

As I said, he is an asshole.
 
You can read it right here in JPP.

In one of my earlier posts I was making a point about the nature of Internet postings. Quite honestly, I think they suck.

I mentioned that before the Internet opened its doors to opinions, one had to write an opinion which met the standards and expectations of editors of newspapers and magazines across the nation. I mentioned that I often wrote opinions that were published...and each opinion published, like the opinions of all others, was accompanied by my verified name...and the town in which I lived. It was, and still is, my contention that the reason for the kinds of posts that appear on the Internet, is because they are totally anonymous. A person can say anything he/she wants and do it from behind a closed door, so to speak.

I also mentioned that I wrote MANY op ed and letters-to-the-editor opinion pieces. My guess would be over 200...published in newspapers across the US...and in England. My successes were a source of pride for me...back then just getting a letter published was an accomplishment. I had dozens published in places like the NY Times, an op ed sized letter taking on the opinion of former Times editor A. M. Rosenthal on drugs. I got a MY TURN published in Newsweek Magazine (paid me $1000 for that). Not an easy thing to do. When Lloyd Bentsen debated Dan Quayle in a heated exchange before the 1988 election...the national magazines were inundated with opinion letters. Not only did I get one selected for publication by Newsweek...I also got one selected by Time Magazine...both national magazines publishing a letter from me from among 800 to 900 letters received by each.

Lots of pride involved there.

If you would like the dates of each publication...I'll be glad to furnish them. Just ask and I will PM you the information.

Tobytone is an asshole...who is bothered by me. He also took a comment I made that I served a drink to Frank Sinatra at a party in the Hamptons...to "He claims he is the personal bartender to Frank Sinatra."

As I said, he is an asshole.
Yes, I would be very interested and thank you.
 
Yeah, the reports are bad. But this isn’t the first time America’s faced ugly politics or heavy hands in power. We’ve had internment camps, segregation laws, McCarthy’s witch hunts, and more corruption than anyone cares to count. Presidents and parties both have overstepped plenty. And still, the Republic held. Elections went on. New people took the reins.

I’m not excusing a thing — just remembering the record. We’ve weathered storms before. We’ll do it again. That’s the deal we make with freedom: when it breaks, we fix it. Not with hate or violence, but with votes, voices, and conscience.
I’m not willing to just let it happen because it happened before. Former administrations in my lifetime obeyed the courts. This time it’s different.
 
I strongly doubt Trump's civil war will be anything like Abraham Lincoln's. IMO, it'll look more like the 1960s than the 1860s.

Still, history is a great teacher as George Santayana often advised and allows students of history to project the future based upon past patterns of human social behaviors.

Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When
change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is
set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as
among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past
are condemned to repeat it.
In the first stage of life the mind is
frivolous and easily distracted; it misses progress by failing in
consecutiveness and persistence. This is the condition of children and
barbarians, in whom instinct has learned nothing from experience. In a
second stage men are docile to events, plastic to new habits and
suggestions, yet able to graft them on original instincts, which they
thus bring to fuller satisfaction. This is the plane of manhood and
true progress. Last comes a stage when retentiveness is exhausted and
all that happens is at once forgotten; a vain, because unpractical,
repetition of the past takes the place of plasticity and fertile
readaptation. In a moving world readaptation is the price of longevity.
The hard shell, far from protecting the vital principle, condemns it to
die down slowly and be gradually chilled; immortality in such a case
must have been secured earlier, by giving birth to a generation plastic
to the contemporary world and able to retain its lessons. Thus old age
is as forgetful as youth, and more incorrigible; it displays the same
inattentiveness to conditions; its memory becomes self-repeating and
degenerates into an instinctive reaction, like a bird’s chirp.


.
 

Apparently you've already forgotten the whole invention of the Tea Party and why -- because of Obama. It's slipped your mind completely that proto-MAGATs were calling for his impeachment and removal before he was even sworn in. You must have not seen the videos and photos of Tea Party rallies with signs saying "We came unarmed -- this time" -- and the rallies at which they WERE armed. You forgot all about the #TangerineTyrant and his bullshit about Obama's birth certificate, didn't you? That wasn't racist or anything, right?
 
Apparently you've already forgotten the whole invention of the Tea Party and why -- because of Obama. It's slipped your mind completely that proto-MAGATs were calling for his impeachment and removal before he was even sworn in. You must have not seen the videos and photos of Tea Party rallies with signs saying "We came unarmed -- this time" -- and the rallies at which they WERE armed. You forgot all about the #TangerineTyrant and his bullshit about Obama's birth certificate, didn't you? That wasn't racist or anything, right?

What is happening now from the left? Oh, and here we go again with your racist bullshit. I'm racist because I voted for Trump?
Nah, it wasn't Obama's color I disliked, it was his ideas. I often mentioned a black woman I'd vote for in a moment. Racist?
So, what about all the left's demonstrations? Anti Israel? River to the sea? College protests? The George Floyd riots? Hypocritical? :palm:
 
For the record, the other assholes usually capitalize the "D."

Please accept my sincere apology.

take-secretarian.gif
 
No. Do you think that means it was done out of hate? Are you of the "you either love something or you hate it" school?

Think!
Offhand, I can't think of a single act of violence towards someone that was done "out of indifference" towards that someone. Can you?

Can you think of a single act of violence towards someone that was done out of anything other than hatred/anger towards that someone?

Think!
Gotta be careful with that kind of thinking. If someone were attacking you violently...and the only reasonable way to protect yourself would be with violence...you might be tempted to use violence.
Here, you're referring to self defense, not violence.
In damn near every way possible.
Meaningless answer.
I said "probably." Why did you ignore that word?
Attempted cop out.
I do not have hatred towards Trump.
:rofl2:
If he were ever in need for help and I could offer it, I would do so in a heartbeat.
:rofl2:
He is a human...a fellow living creature on this planet.
True.
I have mentioned that dozens of times.
I personally haven't seen it. Maybe you have, though, in posts that I haven't read. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here.
I would, in fact, love to play a round of golf with him...although I doubt that will ever happen.
:rofl2:
But he poses an existential threat to the Republic that we are supposed to protect...
:rofl2:
so I oppose him, his political agenda, the people who support him...and the people who are not actively opposing him.
You oppose A LOT of people then. Fair enough.
If that bothers you...what can I say. Put me on IGNORE if you must.
Oppose whoever you wish. Stand up for whatever you believe in. Just don't incite violence, and condemn the people who DO incite violence. Peace is the prize. Trump's done a really good job at that so far... He's on about a one peace deal per month pace atm.
 
Offhand, I can't think of a single act of violence towards someone that was done "out of indifference" towards that someone. Can you?

Throughout history, lots of acts of violence have been done out of indifference. There are people who have had acts of violence done to them simply because of the "following orders" "defense." The people doing that are indifferent to the people to whom they are doing the violence in the name of protecting themselves from repercussions that might be visited upon them for refusing to administer the violence.
Can you think of a single act of violence towards someone that was done out of anything other than hatred/anger towards that someone?

Ask and answered above.
Think!

Here, you're referring to self defense, not violence.

It is violence...motivated by self-defense. BUT IT IS OFTEN VIOLENCE.


Meaningless answer.

No it isn't.
Attempted cop out.

Not in any way.
I repeat, I do not hate Trump. Do not let your own apparent hatred toward so many cause you to suppose others are as shallow as you. If Trump were ever in a situation where I could help him...I would.

Whew. That must be difficult for you to deal with.
I personally haven't seen it. Maybe you have, though, in posts that I haven't read. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here.

Who the fuck cares what you give me the benefit of your silly doubt about?
Almost any golfer would like that opportunity. Because you are an asshole, do not let that trick you into thinking that others are also assholes like you.
You oppose A LOT of people then. Fair enough.

Yeah.
Oppose whoever you wish. Stand up for whatever you believe in.

I intend to. I do not need your permission.
Just don't incite violence, and condemn the people who DO incite violence.

Poorly written sentence. Read it over again...or get someone to help you say what you obviously intended to say.

Or were you actually suggesting that I should not "condemn the people who DO incite violence?
Peace is the prize. Trump's done a really good job at that so far... He's on about a one peace deal per month pace atm.
Trump is a fucking incompetent moron...and apparently, so are you.

Keep your head up his ass if you choose. That is your right for now.
 
Nope. Just for people that can think for themselves and not run around being a part of whatever fad ideology is being served this generation.
You'll find the same empty headed, lying, low IQ leftists you would find elsewhere. The difference is that they can't get you banned for your opinions here.
 
Back
Top